By Categories: Editorials, Polity

Is it right to do away with caste -based reservation in India ? Is it the right time to do so?

This has been the most raging yet profoundly unanswered debate .There has not been a single comprehensive study in this regard and many shy away from this debate.In this regard , we at UPSCTREE tried to find out all that is there with regards to this debate and added our views after analyzing thoroughly the various reports that exists for this.

Introduction :-

The Indian Caste based reservation system and the arguments related to it have been the subject of electoral promises, books, national debates, forum discussions and riots.

Ambedkar spent a long time trying to figure out the best way to overcome centuries of social discrimination. He determined that until there was equitable representation of people in all positions of influence, including policy making, government service and enterprise, any efforts made by others on their behalf would either be half-hearted or executed with a ‘benefactor’ mentality.

The idea behind reservations was therefore empowerment, not charity. There are other programs that focus on education and health. Reservation isn’t one of them. This is why its effects starts with education, which Ambedkar felt was crucial to enable representation in positions of influence.

So reservation effectively creates a ‘protected class’ that competes within itself until it reaches a stage where it can compete with the rest of the country. Meanwhile, as their numbers grow in positions of influence (not just government, but doctors, lawyers, professors, executives, etc.) the caste prejudice will wither away.

Reservation system in India

Pros:-

  1. It provides equality in opportunity– The right to equality as enshrined under article 14-19 of the fundamental rights of the constitution provides for certain provisions which enables the discriminated and underprivileged sections of the society to get a level playing field to compete with the mainstream society.Hence it is often considered as positive discrimination or affirmative action.
  2. Economic empowerment – By enabling access to employment
  3. Social empowerment– With increasing level of income, urbanization etc. the so called “backward classes” are able to shed off their caste identity to great extent.
  4. Political empowerment- Ability to climb the ladder by becoming popular representatives and active members in decision making processes which not only helps in their upward mobilization of individuals but also empowers the group as whole.
  5. Reports like Sachar Committee point out that there exist subgroups within the homogenous groups, who remain backward. Caste Based Reservation Policy gives an opportunity to the Indian polity to allow advancement of the subgroups.
  6. Further, reservation policies for Other Backward Classes are subject to creamy layer limitations; thus there already exists a filtering mechanism to ensure that the benefits of reservations do not pass to the undeserving ones.
  7. To unleash the Indian potential and wake up the sleeping giant it is necessary to empower all sections of society and provide a helping wherever it is needed.

Cons-

  1. The reservation policy was envisaged as a measure to impart equality of opportunity, but it has instead led to entrenchment of caste system. Many castes today, strive to get recognized as backward caste, to get benefits of the reservation policy; a phenomenon which has been referred to as ‘Race to Bottom’.
  2. Identity politics– Political mobilization on the basis of caste.
  3. The advanced sections with in , take the benefit and defeat the very purpose of reservation. The real needy are always found in want of support and the supports are cornered by the advanced few within the same caste/tribe.
  4. Reservation over generations – Reservation is to push a particular a generation, so that the next generation can develop themselves without reservation. But in practice, reservation transcends the generations and defeats its very purpose. After all, there is no rationale behind providing reservation to the children of well-to-do individuals.
  5. Introduces bad politics: One of the prime reasons why such a system is not fully eradicated yet because every politician plays safe uses it as a trump card for collective vote from a community.
  6. Creates division: This preferential system creates another sort of divide amongst the masses, creates lobbies and partitions with respective agendas and eventually a nation cannot stand as a whole where every section and individual are driven by sectarian means.
  7. Introduces handicap: When one gets advantage of it, the meritocracy is questioned without logic and leads to rift in workplaces and institutions.
  8. Hindrance to self-respect: This wouldn’t need emphasizing .People with merit often face this challenge as they are preconceived as people without ability. This kills the self respect of merited individual.
  9. Further, Constitution makers envisaged reservation policy as a temporary measure to enable the weaker sections to come to a certain benchmark of advancement, from where they could compete in equal capacity. But, the present scenario is such that Indian polity cannot be even envisaged without these reservation policies. There are sections who actually need it but yet to get it and there are sections who are fighting for it even though they really don’t need it.
  10. Lack of Frequent Measurement and Re-calibration had only benefitted the already well off masses of the reserved class. There have been no systematic studies to show how the present policies are working. Further, there have been no political debates on effectiveness of reservation policy.
  11. Increasing demand of the people to be included in the reserved category which sometimes leads to widespread violence and bloodshed.
  12. It divides the society within.

Considering the above argument though it seems true that India should do away with the reservation on the basis of caste system but whether it is the right time to do so is another debate because:-

Although the reservation system is led to economic empowerment but it has not resulted in social empowerment. Until a socially equitable society is not created, a system of positive discrimination cannot be abolished.There is a large section of the society which do not have access to basic education and a standard employment,so abolishing this system now will put them in perpetual penury and misery.

So to dilute the caste based identity and foster social empowerment, certain steps need to be taken by both the government and the individual.Few steps can be taken in this direction like-

  1. Creamy layer should be introduced in all reservation methods.
  2. Every citizen should be identified on the basis of humanity not on the basis of caste and credited on the basis of caliber not the on the basis of birth.

  3. The next generation, that is the progeny of the candidate who has already used the reservation,cannot use the quota again, unless his father’s income is less than a stipulated amount as per the economic status and computations of the time.
  4. A systematic study and proper alignment is required and the reservation should be linked to economic status as well.
  5. Economic security and a good education is the only way to bring equality in all social segments in the society.
  6. So once all the citizens of the country get the minimum opportunity to maximize their potential, then it will be judicious do away with the reservation system as a whole or modify it to suit the need of the time .It will then no more identify people on the basis of caste and  the“race to the bottom” phenomenon will be stopped.

Conclusion:-

So in conclusion ,even though it is desirable to do away with reservation system , it is not the right time to do so due to various social and economic compulsions.Reservation system must not be looked upon as discriminatory , instead it should be viewed as affirmative action.The real necessity is to monitor its progress  and its impact in real time  to ward off any undue advantage and modify it according to need.To put it rather simply – it should be given to those who really need it.Another aspect is that , as it is intricately linked to caste , it perpetuates the vicious circle of caste, if we really want a caste less society then  it should be linked to social and economic status rather than blindly relying on caste as a sign of “backwardness” .It hampers the the very social status of the people for whom it was created , by tagging people as “backward” according to their birth.Caste is not an indicator of “backwardness” and the reservation policy should designed as such.Moreover, as far as caste system is concerned  – the realistic view is that caste system is here to stay (if we learn anything form history) . The necessity is thus not to fight with caste system but to fight casteism – that is discrimination on the basis of caste.Let people have their caste but casteism should be fought with vigor and strength.

Gandhiji , being a realist , very well knew that it is not possible to remove caste system as a whole but what can be done is to do away with casteism.If there is no discrimination based on caste – the very essence of caste will wither away.It is similar to religion, people will always have it and if there is anything that can be done to better the society , then it is not to do away with religion as whole but to reform it from within.This was the essence of the great reformers like Raja Rammohan Ray, who wanted to reform things from within. Think any system as a man.If a man has a disease , find a solution to the disease , don’t throw away the man.Similarly , as far as any system is concerned , find the solution to reform it rather than to just abandon it – which is , in all its reality a harder thing to do and not a realizable goal, at least in limited lifespan of a man.

 

Share is Caring, Choose Your Platform!

Recent Posts


  • In a diverse country like India, where each State is socially, culturally, economically, and politically distinct, measuring Governance becomes increasingly tricky. The Public Affairs Index (PAI 2021) is a scientifically rigorous, data-based framework that measures the quality of governance at the Sub-national level and ranks the States and Union Territories (UTs) of India on a Composite Index (CI).


    States are classified into two categories – Large and Small – using population as the criteria.

    In PAI 2021, PAC defined three significant pillars that embody GovernanceGrowth, Equity, and Sustainability. Each of the three Pillars is circumscribed by five governance praxis Themes.

    The themes include – Voice and Accountability, Government Effectiveness, Rule of Law, Regulatory Quality and Control of Corruption.

    At the bottom of the pyramid, 43 component indicators are mapped to 14 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that are relevant to the States and UTs.

    This forms the foundation of the conceptual framework of PAI 2021. The choice of the 43 indicators that go into the calculation of the CI were dictated by the objective of uncovering the complexity and multidimensional character of development governance

    The Equity Principle

    The Equity Pillar of the PAI 2021 Index analyses the inclusiveness impact at the Sub-national level in the country; inclusiveness in terms of the welfare of a society that depends primarily on establishing that all people feel that they have a say in the governance and are not excluded from the mainstream policy framework.

    This requires all individuals and communities, but particularly the most vulnerable, to have an opportunity to improve or maintain their wellbeing. This chapter of PAI 2021 reflects the performance of States and UTs during the pandemic and questions the governance infrastructure in the country, analysing the effectiveness of schemes and the general livelihood of the people in terms of Equity.

    Growth and its Discontents

    Growth in its multidimensional form encompasses the essence of access to and the availability and optimal utilisation of resources. By resources, PAI 2021 refer to human resources, infrastructure and the budgetary allocations. Capacity building of an economy cannot take place if all the key players of growth do not drive development. The multiplier effects of better health care, improved educational outcomes, increased capital accumulation and lower unemployment levels contribute magnificently in the growth and development of the States.

    The Pursuit Of Sustainability

    The Sustainability Pillar analyses the access to and usage of resources that has an impact on environment, economy and humankind. The Pillar subsumes two themes and uses seven indicators to measure the effectiveness of government efforts with regards to Sustainability.

     

    The Curious Case Of The Delta

    The Delta Analysis presents the results on the State performance on year-on-year improvement. The rankings are measured as the Delta value over the last five to 10 years of data available for 12 Key Development Indicators (KDI). In PAI 2021, 12 indicators across the three Pillars of Equity (five indicators), Growth (five indicators) and Sustainability (two indicators). These KDIs are the outcome indicators crucial to assess Human Development. The Performance in the Delta Analysis is then compared to the Overall PAI 2021 Index.

    Key Findings:-

    1. In the Large States category (overall), Chhattisgarh ranks 1st, followed by Odisha and Telangana, whereas, towards the bottom are Maharashtra at 16th, Assam at 17th and Gujarat at 18th. Gujarat is one State that has seen startling performance ranking 5th in the PAI 2021 Index outperforming traditionally good performing States like Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, but ranks last in terms of Delta
    2. In the Small States category (overall), Nagaland tops, followed by Mizoram and Tripura. Towards the tail end of the overall Delta ranking is Uttarakhand (9th), Arunachal Pradesh (10th) and Meghalaya (11th). Nagaland despite being a poor performer in the PAI 2021 Index has come out to be the top performer in Delta, similarly, Mizoram’s performance in Delta is also reflected in it’s ranking in the PAI 2021 Index
    3. In terms of Equity, in the Large States category, Chhattisgarh has the best Delta rate on Equity indicators, this is also reflected in the performance of Chhattisgarh in the Equity Pillar where it ranks 4th. Following Chhattisgarh is Odisha ranking 2nd in Delta-Equity ranking, but ranks 17th in the Equity Pillar of PAI 2021. Telangana ranks 3rd in Delta-Equity ranking even though it is not a top performer in this Pillar in the overall PAI 2021 Index. Jharkhand (16th), Uttar Pradesh (17th) and Assam (18th) rank at the bottom with Uttar Pradesh’s performance in line with the PAI 2021 Index
    4. Odisha and Nagaland have shown the best year-on-year improvement under 12 Key Development indicators.

    In the Scheme of Things

    The Scheme Analysis adds an additional dimension to ranking of the States on their governance. It attempts to complement the Governance Model by trying to understand the developmental activities undertaken by State Governments in the form of schemes. It also tries to understand whether better performance of States in schemes reflect in better governance.

    The Centrally Sponsored schemes that were analysed are National Health Mission (NHM), Umbrella Integrated Child Development Services scheme (ICDS), Mahatma Gandh National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SmSA) and MidDay Meal Scheme (MDMS).

    National Health Mission (NHM)

    • In the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Goa and Tamil Nadu and, the bottom three performers are Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Bihar.
    • In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers were Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Mizoram; and, the bottom three performers are Manipur, Assam and Meghalaya.

     

    INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (ICDS)

    • Among the 60:40 division States, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh are the top three performers and Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Delhi appear as the bottom three performers.
    • Among the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland; and, the bottom three performers are Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh

     

    MID- DAY MEAL SCHEME (MDMS)

    • Among the 60:40 division States, Goa, West Bengal and Delhi appear as the top three performers and Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Bihar appear as the bottom three performers.
    • Among the 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh and Tripura were the top three performers and Jammu & Kashmir, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh were the bottom three performers

     

    SAMAGRA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SMSA)

    • West Bengal, Bihar and Tamil Nadu were the top three States amongst the 60:40 division States; while Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan appeared as the bottom three performers
    • In the case of 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Assam and Tripura were the top three performers and Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand featured as the bottom three

     

    MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME (MGNREGS)

    • Among the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa and the bottom three performers are Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Goa
    • In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Mizoram, Sikkim and Nagaland and the bottom three performers are Manipur and Assam