Lokpal & Lokayukta — All that you need to know
1. Origin and Background
- Concept borrowed from Sweden’s Ombudsman institution (Scandinavian origin).
- The term “Lokpal” was coined by Dr. L.M. Singhvi in 1963.
- First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), 1966–70 — chaired by Morarji Desai — first recommended setting up a Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayuktas in states.
- The First Lokpal Bill was introduced in Parliament in 1968 (Indira Gandhi government) — lapsed with dissolution of Lok Sabha.
- Bills were introduced in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2001, 2005, 2008 — all lapsed.
- Anna Hazare movement (2011) demanding Jan Lokpal Bill renewed public pressure.
- The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 was finally passed — came into force on 16 Jan 2014.
2. Lokpal — Composition
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Nature | Multi-member statutory body |
| Composition | 1 Chairperson + up to 8 Members |
| Judicial Members | Minimum 50% of all members must be judicial members |
| SC/ST/OBC/Minorities/Women | Minimum 50% of members must be from these categories |
| Chairperson Eligibility | Former CJI OR former SC Judge OR eminent person with 25+ years in anti-corruption matters |
| Member Eligibility | Judicial: Former SC judge. Non-judicial: Eminent person with same qualifications as Chairperson |
3. Lokpal — Appointment
- Appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a Selection Committee.
Selection Committee
| Member | Role |
|---|---|
| Prime Minister | Chairperson |
| Speaker of Lok Sabha | Member |
| Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha | Member |
| Chief Justice of India (or SC Judge nominated by CJI) | Member |
| One eminent jurist (nominated by President on recommendation of above four) | Member |
- A Search Committee (8 members; at least 50% from SC/ST/OBC/minorities/women) assists the Selection Committee in preparing a panel of names.
4. Lokpal — Term, Salary & Removal
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Term of Office | 5 years or age of 70 years, whichever is earlier |
| Re-appointment | Not eligible for reappointment |
| Chairperson Salary | Equal to Chief Justice of India |
| Member Salary | Equal to a Judge of the Supreme Court |
| Removal | By President on address by each House of Parliament — majority of total membership AND 2/3 of members present and voting (same as SC Judge removal) |
5. Lokpal — Jurisdiction
- The Prime Minister (with significant restrictions — see below)
- Union Ministers
- Members of Parliament
- Officers of Groups A, B, C, D of the Central Government
- Chairpersons, members, officers and directors of Central Government bodies, boards, corporations, societies, trusts, autonomous bodies
- Any person associated with an NGO receiving over Rs. 10 lakh annually from foreign sources OR over Rs. 1 crore from the Central Government
PM — Restrictions on Inquiry
Important: The PM can be investigated by Lokpal — but NOT for matters relating to:
- International relations
- External and internal security
- Public order
- Atomic energy
- Space
Also: Inquiry against PM must be approved by full bench of Lokpal (all members) and proceedings must be held in camera (secret).
6. Lokpal — Powers and Functions
- Can receive and inquire into complaints of corruption against public servants.
- Has its own Inquiry Wing (Director of Inquiry) and Prosecution Wing (Director of Prosecution).
- Has powers of a civil court for inquiries.
- Can order CBI investigation; investigating officer cannot be transferred without Lokpal’s approval once a case is referred.
- Superintendence over CBI only in cases referred to it — not general superintendence.
- Can attach and confiscate assets of public servants while inquiry is pending.
- Complaints must be filed within 7 years of the alleged offence.
- False and frivolous complaints: complainant may be penalised up to Rs. 1 lakh fine.
7. First Lokpal of India
8. Lokayukta
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Nature | State-level anti-corruption ombudsman |
| Constitutional Status | NOT mentioned in the Constitution |
| Established by | State legislation |
| First State | Maharashtra — 1971 |
| Second State | Bihar — 1973 |
| Mandate under 2013 Act | States must establish Lokayukta within 1 year of the Act coming into force |
| Uniformity | No uniform structure — each state has its own law |
9. Key Committees Related to Lokpal
| Committee / Commission | Year | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| First ARC (Morarji Desai) | 1966 | Recommended Lokpal at Centre and Lokayukta in states |
| L.M. Singhvi Committee | 1971 | Coined the term “Lokpal”; detailed recommendations on structure |
| Sarkaria Commission | 1983 | Recommended Lokayukta in every state |
| Second ARC (Veerappa Moily) | 2005 | Strongly recommended an independent Lokpal with wide jurisdiction |
10. Quick Comparison — Lokpal vs. CVC
| Feature | Lokpal | CVC |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Statutory (2013) | Statutory (2003) |
| Scope | Elected representatives + bureaucrats | Only bureaucrats (Group A & B) |
| PM in jurisdiction | Yes (with restrictions) | No |
| Ministers / MPs | Yes | No |
| Prosecution power | Yes (own Prosecution Wing) | No (advisory role only) |
| CBI relationship | Superintendence in referred cases | General superintendence over CBI |
Receive Daily Updates
Recent Posts
- In the Large States category (overall), Chhattisgarh ranks 1st, followed by Odisha and Telangana, whereas, towards the bottom are Maharashtra at 16th, Assam at 17th and Gujarat at 18th. Gujarat is one State that has seen startling performance ranking 5th in the PAI 2021 Index outperforming traditionally good performing States like Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, but ranks last in terms of Delta
- In the Small States category (overall), Nagaland tops, followed by Mizoram and Tripura. Towards the tail end of the overall Delta ranking is Uttarakhand (9th), Arunachal Pradesh (10th) and Meghalaya (11th). Nagaland despite being a poor performer in the PAI 2021 Index has come out to be the top performer in Delta, similarly, Mizoram’s performance in Delta is also reflected in it’s ranking in the PAI 2021 Index
- In terms of Equity, in the Large States category, Chhattisgarh has the best Delta rate on Equity indicators, this is also reflected in the performance of Chhattisgarh in the Equity Pillar where it ranks 4th. Following Chhattisgarh is Odisha ranking 2nd in Delta-Equity ranking, but ranks 17th in the Equity Pillar of PAI 2021. Telangana ranks 3rd in Delta-Equity ranking even though it is not a top performer in this Pillar in the overall PAI 2021 Index. Jharkhand (16th), Uttar Pradesh (17th) and Assam (18th) rank at the bottom with Uttar Pradesh’s performance in line with the PAI 2021 Index
- Odisha and Nagaland have shown the best year-on-year improvement under 12 Key Development indicators.
- In the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Goa and Tamil Nadu and, the bottom three performers are Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Bihar.
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers were Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Mizoram; and, the bottom three performers are Manipur, Assam and Meghalaya.
- Among the 60:40 division States, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh are the top three performers and Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Delhi appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland; and, the bottom three performers are Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh
- Among the 60:40 division States, Goa, West Bengal and Delhi appear as the top three performers and Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Bihar appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh and Tripura were the top three performers and Jammu & Kashmir, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh were the bottom three performers
- West Bengal, Bihar and Tamil Nadu were the top three States amongst the 60:40 division States; while Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan appeared as the bottom three performers
- In the case of 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Assam and Tripura were the top three performers and Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand featured as the bottom three
- Among the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa and the bottom three performers are Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Goa
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Mizoram, Sikkim and Nagaland and the bottom three performers are Manipur and Assam
In a diverse country like India, where each State is socially, culturally, economically, and politically distinct, measuring Governance becomes increasingly tricky. The Public Affairs Index (PAI 2021) is a scientifically rigorous, data-based framework that measures the quality of governance at the Sub-national level and ranks the States and Union Territories (UTs) of India on a Composite Index (CI).
States are classified into two categories – Large and Small – using population as the criteria.
In PAI 2021, PAC defined three significant pillars that embody Governance – Growth, Equity, and Sustainability. Each of the three Pillars is circumscribed by five governance praxis Themes.
The themes include – Voice and Accountability, Government Effectiveness, Rule of Law, Regulatory Quality and Control of Corruption.
At the bottom of the pyramid, 43 component indicators are mapped to 14 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that are relevant to the States and UTs.
This forms the foundation of the conceptual framework of PAI 2021. The choice of the 43 indicators that go into the calculation of the CI were dictated by the objective of uncovering the complexity and multidimensional character of development governance

The Equity Principle
The Equity Pillar of the PAI 2021 Index analyses the inclusiveness impact at the Sub-national level in the country; inclusiveness in terms of the welfare of a society that depends primarily on establishing that all people feel that they have a say in the governance and are not excluded from the mainstream policy framework.
This requires all individuals and communities, but particularly the most vulnerable, to have an opportunity to improve or maintain their wellbeing. This chapter of PAI 2021 reflects the performance of States and UTs during the pandemic and questions the governance infrastructure in the country, analysing the effectiveness of schemes and the general livelihood of the people in terms of Equity.



Growth and its Discontents
Growth in its multidimensional form encompasses the essence of access to and the availability and optimal utilisation of resources. By resources, PAI 2021 refer to human resources, infrastructure and the budgetary allocations. Capacity building of an economy cannot take place if all the key players of growth do not drive development. The multiplier effects of better health care, improved educational outcomes, increased capital accumulation and lower unemployment levels contribute magnificently in the growth and development of the States.



The Pursuit Of Sustainability
The Sustainability Pillar analyses the access to and usage of resources that has an impact on environment, economy and humankind. The Pillar subsumes two themes and uses seven indicators to measure the effectiveness of government efforts with regards to Sustainability.



The Curious Case Of The Delta
The Delta Analysis presents the results on the State performance on year-on-year improvement. The rankings are measured as the Delta value over the last five to 10 years of data available for 12 Key Development Indicators (KDI). In PAI 2021, 12 indicators across the three Pillars of Equity (five indicators), Growth (five indicators) and Sustainability (two indicators). These KDIs are the outcome indicators crucial to assess Human Development. The Performance in the Delta Analysis is then compared to the Overall PAI 2021 Index.
Key Findings:-
In the Scheme of Things
The Scheme Analysis adds an additional dimension to ranking of the States on their governance. It attempts to complement the Governance Model by trying to understand the developmental activities undertaken by State Governments in the form of schemes. It also tries to understand whether better performance of States in schemes reflect in better governance.
The Centrally Sponsored schemes that were analysed are National Health Mission (NHM), Umbrella Integrated Child Development Services scheme (ICDS), Mahatma Gandh National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SmSA) and MidDay Meal Scheme (MDMS).
National Health Mission (NHM)
INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (ICDS)
MID- DAY MEAL SCHEME (MDMS)
SAMAGRA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SMSA)
MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME (MGNREGS)