Authored by – Gaurav Aggrawal (2014 IAS Topper)
They say Napoleon couldn’t have happened without the French Revolution. They also say that the rise of Napoleon was inevitable in the aftermath of the French Revolution. People and events are mere cogs in the wheel of history. Once there is a necessity, and the conditions are ripe, the idea takes fruition.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in governance is an idea whose time has come. The necessity is there – our people are growing ever more exasperated and demanding efficiency in public services delivery while the traditional systems seem to be unable to cater to these changing times.
Also, the conditions are ripe – thanks to the use of IT there is a lot of data in the government today in machine-readable form, and the technologies have reached a level where they can rival any human on a real-time and cost-effective way.All that is needed now is that leap.
AI would fundamentally transform methods of governance in this country. We often hear complaints that the implementation of government schemes remain confined only to papers. Now, what if there is a way to check if things are happening on the ground? Take, for example, the Swacch Bharat Mission (SBM). To make sure that the toilets are built, the government has developed a mobile app where the government functionary will have to go to the toilet site, click a photo of the toilet along with the beneficiary, and then upload it to the central server. Connectivity issues are taken care of by giving offline photo-clicking mode and uploading the photos when the person comes back on a 2G network. This curbs malpractice to a great extent.
However, there are ten crore toilets that are needed to be built and hence ten crore photographs. Is it manually possible to check these photos? Or if the toilet is in use or is stashed with hay? And is the same beneficiary appearing on multiple photos? What if 100 photos have been uploaded from sitting in an office? Clearly no.
The present system relies on people to do random checks to create a deterrence effect but so has the system that we have relied upon for past 70 years and the outcome is for us to see. It does not work because of people either not having enough time or lacking the inclination to do petty things.
Now what if you actually get a way to process each of these 10 crore photos and generate an alert whenever the photograph is not that of an entirely built toilet which is actually in use (not stashed with hay or other stuff) and same beneficiary doesn’t appear in multiple photos or multiple photographs don’t get uploaded sitting in the office? Won’t cheating and malpractices go down by order of magnitude as people realise that each photo would be scrutinised and not just some small sample? Wouldn’t it be awesome to know we have ten crore functional toilets on the ground and not just paper? That, my friends, AI can achieve – and in a very cost efficient manner.
But then the sceptics argue that in rural and remote India, the penetration of internet is very low and as a result, AI will have limited or no applicability there and will create a digital divide. However, contrary to this, the need and applicability for AI are more in the remotest areas of the country than in the heart of the capital. That is because it is in these most secluded areas that the traditional governance systems are entirely broken. Physical infrastructure is inefficient, and the people are poor and unaware.
Generally, no one wants a posting there – most people there would be on punishment postings, and as soon as they come, they would start spending their energies in getting a transfer back to the mainstream areas. As a result, there are problems of severe under-staffing, lack of morale, poor quality in the government workforce and weak monitoring of government schemes and implementation. In Delhi and state capitals, there would be a lot of people to check if toilets are built, we won’t need AI. But who will check in the tribal areas of Rajasthan or Chattisgarh? Imagine if in these regions, the government schemes start functioning as they were supposed to do, AI will bridge the development and digital divide, not accentuate it.
Likewise, again contrary to what the sceptics say, the scope of AI is immense in traditional sectors such as agriculture. For example, take the government run crop insurance scheme; in this crop insurance scheme, if the yield is below a threshold, it would trigger an insurance payout to the farmer. To determine the actual yield, millions of crop cutting experiments would be carried out – much more than what are mandated today. As per the scheme guidelines only, even the ones done today “lack reliability, accuracy and speed”.
So mobile app solutions could be developed where geo-tagged photographs of the crop cutting experiment would be uploaded like SBM. Would it not be amazing if we have a solution to check these millions of photos to see whether an actual crop cutting experiment has been carried out by the same person who was supposed to carry it out or has the crop cutting experiment work been sub-contracted to unskilled individuals who went there and clicked selfies?
Similarly, the government runs Kisan Call Centres which receive lakhs of calls every month. Wouldn’t it be priceless if we can get a timely warning from the call centre data that say in Maharashtra, this year the distress level among farmers is unusually high due to this particular factor? Perhaps then the administrative machinery can be activated timely on a war scale to prevent farmer suicides? Or say based on soil and environmental condition reports from our satellites and based on what crop is sown in a particular area, we can predict that this year vulnerability of this crop to this pest is higher, and perhaps we can supply additional required pesticide there and send targeted SMS / agronometric advisories to the farmers in that region?
All these things have not been taken from some science fiction movie but are very much available, proven and economic technologies. Similarly, there is a Kisan suvidha app – the flagship app of the agriculture department – where among other things, a person can upload three photos of some pest infected crops and our scientists would tell what the problem is and what the remedies are.
However, as with the case with almost anything in our country, the rush is huge, there are thousands of queries and there isn’t enough capacity to answer all the queries manually. As a result, many questions go unanswered, and people’s faith suffers due to which they would stop using it in future. Again, AI can help here. Even if the farmer himself doesn’t have a smartphone, even in remotest areas of the country, today someone will be having a smart-phone and there would be a 2G connectivity nearby if not within the village. So these are solutions which can work given the enormous social capital in our rural society.
Finally a word on another common misconception – that AI will lead to loss of jobs. One bane of our country is systems don’t work here. AI can make them work. It can leapfrog us regarding development to the level of Singapore or Western nations. It can bring immense prosperity to the country. The government today is over-burdened, and there is a lack of capacity to do the multitude of tasks it has taken upon itself.
AI is our answer to capacity building. Human beings are not like horses – that after the mass production of cars, horses were suddenly rendered jobless. When machines started spinning cotton, we started to build machines. Productivity gains always create more and better jobs than the ones which are lost due to them. We are still far away from a Terminator kind of scenario where machines may be able to replace humans. That might happen 50 years from now, not today – and if it has to happen, will happen regardless of whether the government uses AI or not. But the massive productivity gains cannot be ignored.
Apart from the examples mentioned above, there is a huge scope of AI in fields such as grievance redressal, law and order, health, education, etc. Today the West is using driverless cars and flying drones. 300 years ago, the West was similarly inventing and using new technologies like the steam engine and cotton gin. We chose to shut our eyes then, and we all know what happened afterwards. Can we afford to make the same mistake again?
Recent Posts
- In the Large States category (overall), Chhattisgarh ranks 1st, followed by Odisha and Telangana, whereas, towards the bottom are Maharashtra at 16th, Assam at 17th and Gujarat at 18th. Gujarat is one State that has seen startling performance ranking 5th in the PAI 2021 Index outperforming traditionally good performing States like Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, but ranks last in terms of Delta
- In the Small States category (overall), Nagaland tops, followed by Mizoram and Tripura. Towards the tail end of the overall Delta ranking is Uttarakhand (9th), Arunachal Pradesh (10th) and Meghalaya (11th). Nagaland despite being a poor performer in the PAI 2021 Index has come out to be the top performer in Delta, similarly, Mizoram’s performance in Delta is also reflected in it’s ranking in the PAI 2021 Index
- In terms of Equity, in the Large States category, Chhattisgarh has the best Delta rate on Equity indicators, this is also reflected in the performance of Chhattisgarh in the Equity Pillar where it ranks 4th. Following Chhattisgarh is Odisha ranking 2nd in Delta-Equity ranking, but ranks 17th in the Equity Pillar of PAI 2021. Telangana ranks 3rd in Delta-Equity ranking even though it is not a top performer in this Pillar in the overall PAI 2021 Index. Jharkhand (16th), Uttar Pradesh (17th) and Assam (18th) rank at the bottom with Uttar Pradesh’s performance in line with the PAI 2021 Index
- Odisha and Nagaland have shown the best year-on-year improvement under 12 Key Development indicators.
- In the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Goa and Tamil Nadu and, the bottom three performers are Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Bihar.
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers were Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Mizoram; and, the bottom three performers are Manipur, Assam and Meghalaya.
- Among the 60:40 division States, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh are the top three performers and Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Delhi appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland; and, the bottom three performers are Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh
- Among the 60:40 division States, Goa, West Bengal and Delhi appear as the top three performers and Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Bihar appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh and Tripura were the top three performers and Jammu & Kashmir, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh were the bottom three performers
- West Bengal, Bihar and Tamil Nadu were the top three States amongst the 60:40 division States; while Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan appeared as the bottom three performers
- In the case of 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Assam and Tripura were the top three performers and Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand featured as the bottom three
- Among the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa and the bottom three performers are Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Goa
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Mizoram, Sikkim and Nagaland and the bottom three performers are Manipur and Assam
In a diverse country like India, where each State is socially, culturally, economically, and politically distinct, measuring Governance becomes increasingly tricky. The Public Affairs Index (PAI 2021) is a scientifically rigorous, data-based framework that measures the quality of governance at the Sub-national level and ranks the States and Union Territories (UTs) of India on a Composite Index (CI).
States are classified into two categories – Large and Small – using population as the criteria.
In PAI 2021, PAC defined three significant pillars that embody Governance – Growth, Equity, and Sustainability. Each of the three Pillars is circumscribed by five governance praxis Themes.
The themes include – Voice and Accountability, Government Effectiveness, Rule of Law, Regulatory Quality and Control of Corruption.
At the bottom of the pyramid, 43 component indicators are mapped to 14 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that are relevant to the States and UTs.
This forms the foundation of the conceptual framework of PAI 2021. The choice of the 43 indicators that go into the calculation of the CI were dictated by the objective of uncovering the complexity and multidimensional character of development governance

The Equity Principle
The Equity Pillar of the PAI 2021 Index analyses the inclusiveness impact at the Sub-national level in the country; inclusiveness in terms of the welfare of a society that depends primarily on establishing that all people feel that they have a say in the governance and are not excluded from the mainstream policy framework.
This requires all individuals and communities, but particularly the most vulnerable, to have an opportunity to improve or maintain their wellbeing. This chapter of PAI 2021 reflects the performance of States and UTs during the pandemic and questions the governance infrastructure in the country, analysing the effectiveness of schemes and the general livelihood of the people in terms of Equity.



Growth and its Discontents
Growth in its multidimensional form encompasses the essence of access to and the availability and optimal utilisation of resources. By resources, PAI 2021 refer to human resources, infrastructure and the budgetary allocations. Capacity building of an economy cannot take place if all the key players of growth do not drive development. The multiplier effects of better health care, improved educational outcomes, increased capital accumulation and lower unemployment levels contribute magnificently in the growth and development of the States.



The Pursuit Of Sustainability
The Sustainability Pillar analyses the access to and usage of resources that has an impact on environment, economy and humankind. The Pillar subsumes two themes and uses seven indicators to measure the effectiveness of government efforts with regards to Sustainability.



The Curious Case Of The Delta
The Delta Analysis presents the results on the State performance on year-on-year improvement. The rankings are measured as the Delta value over the last five to 10 years of data available for 12 Key Development Indicators (KDI). In PAI 2021, 12 indicators across the three Pillars of Equity (five indicators), Growth (five indicators) and Sustainability (two indicators). These KDIs are the outcome indicators crucial to assess Human Development. The Performance in the Delta Analysis is then compared to the Overall PAI 2021 Index.
Key Findings:-
In the Scheme of Things
The Scheme Analysis adds an additional dimension to ranking of the States on their governance. It attempts to complement the Governance Model by trying to understand the developmental activities undertaken by State Governments in the form of schemes. It also tries to understand whether better performance of States in schemes reflect in better governance.
The Centrally Sponsored schemes that were analysed are National Health Mission (NHM), Umbrella Integrated Child Development Services scheme (ICDS), Mahatma Gandh National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SmSA) and MidDay Meal Scheme (MDMS).
National Health Mission (NHM)
INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (ICDS)
MID- DAY MEAL SCHEME (MDMS)
SAMAGRA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SMSA)
MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME (MGNREGS)