Man, needs shelter! It is one of his earliest demands from the environment that he constantly struggles with. No wonder each and every traditional house type reflects this bond. Then over time this relationship grew like an organism into an intricate meshwork of cultures, religions and customs that determined how a man built his living space.
An enchanting story indeed. Research on this aspect is so captivating that it opens newer vistas of knowledge unendingly. However before embarking on this concept-journey let us inform you that we are just presenting the tip of the iceberg. There is a whole lot more waiting to be discovered.

Where Should I Build My Home?
Settlement Site
That depends on who is asking the question. If you are the early man who has just begun to feel the need for habitation, then you will be looking for a dry and warm place within natural formations, such as a cave. Here you are relatively safe from the chilling cold, incessant wet rain and scorching sunny days. Moreover, wild animals can’t get you so easily! Here your settlement is for your own protection.
But as you get bolder and more clannish you might dare to make a leafy home, or even one from the skin of dead animals but locating that home will depend on many factors.
First is your need for water. Take a cut to the past. You and your friends and relatives liked the cave but found it very difficult to carry water up the slope. So, when the weather was good, you all decided to locate yourself next to the river, spring or lake that beckoned below. Huddled together in little hatchments life was easier. There were more plants and berries here, fish too could be caught easily and land all around could be easily inundated once you learnt how to grow crops.
You have now built a wet point settlement.

The settlement was initially established as a religious site and later re-discovered and developed by the British
As the cycle of life went on, the population of your tiny hamlet grew.
Now you had more crops, surpluses, traders, soldiers and kings. Water was no more the sole requirement of a happy life. It was more complicated than that. You wanted land and more land. Rolling fields and plains were on your most wanted list. Thus, settlements now changed location and you now built your home in the middle DI large agricultural tracts.
Land became the determining factor. But land sometimes posed a problem. It became inundated when the river flooded causing unending distress to you and your home. So some vantage point needed to be located. Thus, you built little villages and towns on elevated areas (river terraces, levees) of the flood plain where no home would be affected inspire of the flood.
Now you had built a dry-point settlement.
That too wasn’t enough. Possessing precious commodities attracted foes that looted and plundered, No longer was land the most important criteria of settlement location. You now needed to build your home on a site that stood above all that you possessed. It had to be walled and protected so that no one could enter without permission and sentries guarding the four corners could spot danger from miles away. The list of complications that were added to these defense settlements was endless. Home for you now lay within the high walls of these great structures.

Thus, defense sites came to be the talk of the day.
However, before we end the story and bring you to the present let us remind you that each of these site factors is interlinked. Man, made his choices when the matrix of associated factors fitted perfectly. No site factor functions independently. For example, when looking at land as the determining factor, water cannot be ignored. Only after water was taken into account could man think of prioritizing land. Moreover, culture, society and environment interfere with the choice of site, which precipitate the chain of events mid-way and leave a settlement location balanced on a single factor.

Some sites were chosen because of the health reasons, some being beneficial others being detrimental. For example, hot springs are supposed to possess life-giving properties. Locating your home here, perhaps temporarily, will help you reap benefits from the hot springs. On the other hand, swamps, bogs and marshes are treacherous areas, which are not only difficult to navigate but also disease ridden. Man, tends to avoid such locations.
Then of course weather and climate are important aspects. In a mountainous regime, man chooses a sunny, non-windy slope. Orientation of structures to sun and wind is indeed vital. Then again man practices transhumance, and builds two homes one for summer and the other for the winter. Along the coast, man seeks sheltered harbors that won’t be ravaged by storms and cyclones.
Building a home is not only about site. Material to build a home has to be available nearby. A suitable location should have plenty of building material, whether wood, clay or stone, around it.

Living in a Friendly Neighborhood
Form and Pattern Man is a gregarious animal. He likes to live with others surrounding him. Most settlements are thus packed close together. These are nucleated settlement.
But as man developed huge rolling fields controlled totally by machinery, he ruled out the need for labor. Distant homesteads and extensive grain farms became synonymous with development.

On the other hand, as population grew and grew people were forced to occupy barren tracts that yielded little. In highland areas where livestock rearing is the main occupation, population is rather sparse and scattered. This resulted in settlements far apart and dispersed. Thus, the two basic forms of settlement are nucleated and dispersed.

However, this is not the end of the story. A nucleated settlement comes in many shapes. These are called the pattern of the settlement.
The Rectangular Pattern: This is the most common type of rural settlement pattern in which the lanes are almost straight, meeting each other at right angles.
The Linear Pattern: In this pattern, houses are arranged along either side of a road, railway track, along a river bank or levee, along the edge of a valley above flood-level or along the sea-coast. Many settlements show this linear / ribbon shaped pattern, since roads offer improved access to the central business district and other areas.
The Triangular Pattern: They mostly develop at the confluence of two rivers. At such locations, lateral expansion of the village is restricted by the rivers and therefore, from the confluence point the village develops on the land lying in between the two rivers.
The Star like Pattern: In this pattern, houses cut in several directions. This is common to both villages and towns and is the result of new developments spreading out along the major roads.
The Circular Pattern: This pattern develops around ponds, lakes and crater.
The Traditional South Chinese Lilong Housing
Lilongs (Li -neighborhood, Long-small lanes) are small court-yard housing which grew up on a strong neighborhood principle. This linear, nucleated settlement pattern is characteristic of cities such as Shanghai. Did you know that lilong housing has been in existence for over 140 years?
A lilong settlement may vary in size from 0.35 to 5.0 hectares. Its houses are two or three storied high and attached on either side. It has one side lane at the front and another service lane at the back. The whole settlement may have a few main lanes, which are used as the major circulation passages and are accessible from the other by-streets.
The clear, rational structure of a lilong settlement provides a high degree of security and quietness to its environment. The front housing units along the perimeter of a lilong settlement are converted to shops, which maintain the continuity of commercial activities along the streets.
However, this housing pattern is increasingly under intense commercial pressure. In Shanghai, the land speculation has become so high that residential settlements are facing strong demands of urban renewal. Lack of maintenance of these age-old structures are also causing problems. It would indeed be a pity if these structures were wiped out in the race of vertical expansion.
Recent Posts
- In the Large States category (overall), Chhattisgarh ranks 1st, followed by Odisha and Telangana, whereas, towards the bottom are Maharashtra at 16th, Assam at 17th and Gujarat at 18th. Gujarat is one State that has seen startling performance ranking 5th in the PAI 2021 Index outperforming traditionally good performing States like Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, but ranks last in terms of Delta
- In the Small States category (overall), Nagaland tops, followed by Mizoram and Tripura. Towards the tail end of the overall Delta ranking is Uttarakhand (9th), Arunachal Pradesh (10th) and Meghalaya (11th). Nagaland despite being a poor performer in the PAI 2021 Index has come out to be the top performer in Delta, similarly, Mizoram’s performance in Delta is also reflected in it’s ranking in the PAI 2021 Index
- In terms of Equity, in the Large States category, Chhattisgarh has the best Delta rate on Equity indicators, this is also reflected in the performance of Chhattisgarh in the Equity Pillar where it ranks 4th. Following Chhattisgarh is Odisha ranking 2nd in Delta-Equity ranking, but ranks 17th in the Equity Pillar of PAI 2021. Telangana ranks 3rd in Delta-Equity ranking even though it is not a top performer in this Pillar in the overall PAI 2021 Index. Jharkhand (16th), Uttar Pradesh (17th) and Assam (18th) rank at the bottom with Uttar Pradesh’s performance in line with the PAI 2021 Index
- Odisha and Nagaland have shown the best year-on-year improvement under 12 Key Development indicators.
- In the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Goa and Tamil Nadu and, the bottom three performers are Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Bihar.
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers were Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Mizoram; and, the bottom three performers are Manipur, Assam and Meghalaya.
- Among the 60:40 division States, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh are the top three performers and Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Delhi appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland; and, the bottom three performers are Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh
- Among the 60:40 division States, Goa, West Bengal and Delhi appear as the top three performers and Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Bihar appear as the bottom three performers.
- Among the 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh and Tripura were the top three performers and Jammu & Kashmir, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh were the bottom three performers
- West Bengal, Bihar and Tamil Nadu were the top three States amongst the 60:40 division States; while Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan appeared as the bottom three performers
- In the case of 90:10 division States, Mizoram, Assam and Tripura were the top three performers and Nagaland, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand featured as the bottom three
- Among the 60:40 division States, the top three performers are Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa and the bottom three performers are Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Goa
- In the 90:10 division States, the top three performers are Mizoram, Sikkim and Nagaland and the bottom three performers are Manipur and Assam
In a diverse country like India, where each State is socially, culturally, economically, and politically distinct, measuring Governance becomes increasingly tricky. The Public Affairs Index (PAI 2021) is a scientifically rigorous, data-based framework that measures the quality of governance at the Sub-national level and ranks the States and Union Territories (UTs) of India on a Composite Index (CI).
States are classified into two categories – Large and Small – using population as the criteria.
In PAI 2021, PAC defined three significant pillars that embody Governance – Growth, Equity, and Sustainability. Each of the three Pillars is circumscribed by five governance praxis Themes.
The themes include – Voice and Accountability, Government Effectiveness, Rule of Law, Regulatory Quality and Control of Corruption.
At the bottom of the pyramid, 43 component indicators are mapped to 14 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that are relevant to the States and UTs.
This forms the foundation of the conceptual framework of PAI 2021. The choice of the 43 indicators that go into the calculation of the CI were dictated by the objective of uncovering the complexity and multidimensional character of development governance

The Equity Principle
The Equity Pillar of the PAI 2021 Index analyses the inclusiveness impact at the Sub-national level in the country; inclusiveness in terms of the welfare of a society that depends primarily on establishing that all people feel that they have a say in the governance and are not excluded from the mainstream policy framework.
This requires all individuals and communities, but particularly the most vulnerable, to have an opportunity to improve or maintain their wellbeing. This chapter of PAI 2021 reflects the performance of States and UTs during the pandemic and questions the governance infrastructure in the country, analysing the effectiveness of schemes and the general livelihood of the people in terms of Equity.



Growth and its Discontents
Growth in its multidimensional form encompasses the essence of access to and the availability and optimal utilisation of resources. By resources, PAI 2021 refer to human resources, infrastructure and the budgetary allocations. Capacity building of an economy cannot take place if all the key players of growth do not drive development. The multiplier effects of better health care, improved educational outcomes, increased capital accumulation and lower unemployment levels contribute magnificently in the growth and development of the States.



The Pursuit Of Sustainability
The Sustainability Pillar analyses the access to and usage of resources that has an impact on environment, economy and humankind. The Pillar subsumes two themes and uses seven indicators to measure the effectiveness of government efforts with regards to Sustainability.



The Curious Case Of The Delta
The Delta Analysis presents the results on the State performance on year-on-year improvement. The rankings are measured as the Delta value over the last five to 10 years of data available for 12 Key Development Indicators (KDI). In PAI 2021, 12 indicators across the three Pillars of Equity (five indicators), Growth (five indicators) and Sustainability (two indicators). These KDIs are the outcome indicators crucial to assess Human Development. The Performance in the Delta Analysis is then compared to the Overall PAI 2021 Index.
Key Findings:-
In the Scheme of Things
The Scheme Analysis adds an additional dimension to ranking of the States on their governance. It attempts to complement the Governance Model by trying to understand the developmental activities undertaken by State Governments in the form of schemes. It also tries to understand whether better performance of States in schemes reflect in better governance.
The Centrally Sponsored schemes that were analysed are National Health Mission (NHM), Umbrella Integrated Child Development Services scheme (ICDS), Mahatma Gandh National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SmSA) and MidDay Meal Scheme (MDMS).
National Health Mission (NHM)
INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (ICDS)
MID- DAY MEAL SCHEME (MDMS)
SAMAGRA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (SMSA)
MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME (MGNREGS)