India is home to 18 Biosphere Reserves (BRs). The reserves are representative parts of natural and cultural landscapes extending over large area of terrestrial or coastal/marine ecosystems. Globally there are 621 BRs from 117 countries included so far.

The national Government is responsible for nominating Biosphere Reserves (BRs) if they meet a minimal set of criteria and adhere to minimal set of conditions under the Man and Biosphere Reserve Programme of UNESCO. Biosphere Reserves (BRs) are special environments for both people and the nature and are living examples of how human beings and nature can peacefully co-exist and respect each other’s needs.

List of Biosphere Reserves

List of Biosphere Reserves

1. Cold Desert

7,770sqkm

Designated on 28.08.2009

Part of Pin Valley National Park and surroundings; Chandratal & Sarchu; and Kibber Wildlife      sanctuary in Himachal Pradesh.

Key fauna include Snow Leopard

2.  Nanda Devi

 5860.69sqk

Designated on 18.01.1988

Part of Chamoli, Pithoragarh and Almora districts in Uttarakhand.

 Key fauna include Himalayan Snow Leopard

3. Khangchendzonga

2931.12sqkm

Designated on 07.02.2000

Part of North and West districts in Sikkim.

Key fauna include Snow Leopard, Red Panda

4. Dehang-Dibang

5111.5sqkm

Designated on 02.09.1998

Part of Upper Siang, West Siang and Dibang Valley districts in Arunachal Pradesh.

Key fauna include red panda, binturong

5. Manas

2837sqkm

Designated on 14.03.1989

Part of Kokrajhar, Bongaigaon, Barpeta, Nalbari, Kamprup and Darang districts in A

Key fauna include Golden Langur, Red Pa

6. Nokrek

820 sqkm

Designated on 01.09.1988

Part of East, West and South Garo Hill districts in Meghalaya.

Key fauna include Red Panda

7. Dibru-Saikhova

765sqkm

Designated on   28.07.1997

Part of Dibrugarh and Tinsukia districts in Assam.

Key fauna include Golden Langur

8. Panna

2998.98sqkm

Designated on   25.08.2011

Part of Panna and Chhattarpur districts in Madhya Pradesh

Key fauna include Tiger, Chital, Chinkara, Sambhar and Sloth Bear

9. Kachchh

12,454sqkm

Designated on29.01.2008

Part of Kachchh, Rajkot, Surendranagar and Patan districts in Gujarat.

Key fauna include  Indian Wild Ass

10. Pachmarhi

4981.72sqkm

Designated on03.03.1999

Part of Betul, Hoshangabad and Chhindwara districts in Madhya Pradesh.

Key fauna include Giant Squirrel, Flying Squirrel

11.  Achanakmar- Amarkantak          

3,835.51 sqkm

Designated on 30.03.2005

Part of Anuppur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh and Bilaspur district of Chattisgarh.

Key fauna include Leopards, gaur, chital

12. Sunderban

9630sqkm

Designated on 29.03.1989

Part of delta of Ganges & Brahamaputra river system in West Bengal.

Key fauna include Royal Bengal Tiger

13. Similipal

4374sqkm

Designated on 21.06.1994

Part of Mayurbhanj district in Orissa.

Key fauna include Gaur, Royal Bengal Tiger, Wild Elephant

List of Biosphere Reserves

Biosphere Reserves

14. Seshachalam

4755.997sqkm

Designated on   20.09.2010

Part of Seshachalam hill ranges in Eastern Ghats encompassing part of Chittoor and Kadapa

districts in Andhra Pradesh.

Key fauna include Wild Dog, Golden Jackal, Indian Fox, Jungle Cat, Sloth Bear

15. Nilgiri

5520 sqkm

Designated on 01.08.1986

Part of Wynad, Nagarhole, Bandipur and

Madumalai, Nilambur, Silent Valley and

Siruvani hills in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and

Karnataka.

Key fauna include Nilgiri Tahr, Lion-tailed macaque

16.  Agasthyamalai

3500.36sqkm

Designated on   12.11.2001

Part of Thirunelveli and Kanyakumari districts in Tamil Nadu and Thiruvanthapuram, Kollam

and Pathanmthitta districts in Kerala.

Key fauna include Nilgiri Tahr, Elephants

17. Gulf of Mannar

10500sqkm

Designated on 18.02.1989

Part of Gulf of Mannar extending from Rameswaram island in the North to Kanyakumari in      the South of Tamil Nadu.

Key fauna include Dugong or Sea Cow

18. Great Nicobar

885sqkm

Designated on 06.01.1989

Southernmost island of Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Key fauna include Saltwater Crocodile


Share is Caring, Choose Your Platform!

Receive Daily Updates

Stay updated with current events, tests, material and UPSC related news

Recent Posts

  • Context:-

    At the recently concluded Leaders’ Summit on Climate in April 2021, Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund plan that shall be offered to countries committed to arrest the decline of their tropical forests by 2030.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    What is LEAF Coalition?

    • Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund.
    • LEAF is supported by transnational corporations (TNCs) like Unilever plc, Amazon.com, Inc, Nestle, Airbnb, Inc as well as Emergent, a US-based non-profit.

    Why LEAF Coalition?

    • The world lost more than 10 million hectares of primary tropical forest cover last year, an area roughly the size of Switzerland.
    • Ending tropical and subtropical forest loss by 2030 is a crucial part of meeting global climate, biodiversity and sustainable development goals. Protecting tropical forests offers one of the biggest opportunities for climate action in the coming decade.
    • Tropical forests are massive carbon sinks and by investing in their protection, public and private players are likely to stock up on their carbon credits.
    • The LEAF coalition initiative is a step towards concretising the aims and objectives of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism.
    • REDD+ was created by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It monetised the value of carbon locked up in the tropical forests of most developing countries, thereby propelling these countries to help mitigate climate change.
    • It is a unique initiative as it seeks to help developing countries in battling the double-edged sword of development versus ecological commitment. 
    • The initiative comes at a crucial time. The tropics have lost close to 12.2 million hectares (mha) of tree cover last year according to global estimates released by Global Forest Watch.
    • Of this, a loss of 4.2 mha occurred within humid tropical primary forests alone. It should come as no surprise that most of these lost forests were located in the developing countries of Latin America, Africa and South Asia.
    • Brazil has fared dismally on the parameter of ‘annual primary forest loss’ among all countries. It has lost 1.7 mha of primary forests that are rich storehouse of carbon. India’s estimated loss in 2020 stands at 20.8 kilo hectares.

    Brazil & India 

    • Between 2002-2020, Brazil’s total area of humid primary forest reduced by 7.7 per cent while India’s reduced by 3.4 per cent.
    • Although the loss in India is not as drastic as in Brazil, its position is nevertheless precarious. For India, this loss is equivalent to 951 metric tonnes worth carbon dioxide emissions released in the atmosphere.
    • It is important to draw comparisons between Brazil and India as both countries have adopted a rather lackadaisical attitude towards deforestation-induced climate change. The Brazilian government hardly did anything to control the massive fires that gutted the Amazon rainforest in 2019.
    • It is mostly around May that forest fires peak in India. However, this year India, witnessed massive forest fires in early March in states like Odisha, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh and Mizoram among others.
    • The European Union’s Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service claimed that 0.2 metric tonnes of carbon was emitted in the Uttarakhand forest fires.

    According to the UN-REDD programme, after the energy sector, deforestation accounts for massive carbon emissions — close to 11 per cent — in the atmosphere. Rapid urbanisation and commercialisation of forest produce are the main causes behind rampant deforestation across tropical forests.

    Tribes, Forests and Government

    Disregarding climate change as a valid excuse for the fires, Indian government officials were quick to lay the blame for deforestation on activities of forest dwellers and even labelled them “mischievous elements” and “unwanted elements”.

    Policy makers around the world have emphasised the role of indigenous tribes and local communities in checking deforestation. These communities depend on forests for their survival as well as livelihood. Hence, they understand the need to protect forests. However, by posing legitimate environmental concerns as obstacles to real development, governments of developing countries swiftly avoid protection of forests and rights of forest dwellers.

    For instance, the Government of India has not been forthcoming in recognising the socio-economic, civil, political or even cultural rights of forest dwellers. According to data from the Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs in December, 2020 over 55 per cent of this population has still not been granted either individual or community ownership of their lands.  

    To make matters worse, the government has undertaken systematic and sustained measures to render the landmark Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 ineffective in its implementation. The Act had sought to legitimise claims of forest dwellers on occupied forest land.

    Various government decisions have seriously undermined the position of indigenous people within India. These include proposing amendments to the obsolete Indian Forest Act, 1927 that give forest officials the power to take away forest dwellers’ rights and to even use firearms with impunity.

    There is also the Supreme Court’s order of February, 2019 directing state governments to evict illegal encroachers of forest land or millions of forest dwellers inhabiting forests since generations as a measure to conserve wildlife. Finally, there is the lack of data on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) deaths among the forest dwelling population;

    Tardy administration, insufficient supervision, apathetic attitude and a lack of political intent defeat the cause of forest dwelling populations in India, thereby directly affecting efforts at arresting deforestation.

    Way Forward

    • Implementation of the LEAF Coalition plan will help pump in fresh rigour among developing countries like India, that are reluctant to recognise the contributions of their forest dwelling populations in mitigating climate change.
    • With the deadline for proposal submission fast approaching, India needs to act swiftly on a revised strategy.
    • Although India has pledged to carry out its REDD+ commitments, it is impossible to do so without seeking knowledge from its forest dwelling population.

    Tuntiak Katan, a global indigenous leader from Ecuador and general coordinator of the Global Alliance of Territorial Communities, aptly indicated the next steps at the Climate Summit:

    “The first step is recognition of land rights. The second step is the recognition of the contributions of local communities and indigenous communities, meaning the contributions of indigenous peoples.We also need recognition of traditional knowledge practices in order to fight climate change”

    Perhaps India can begin by taking the first step.