Background
The long-running drought in southern India appears likely to continue into the early months of 2017. All 32 districts in Tamil Nadu have been declared drought-affected with annual rainfall between 35 and 80 per cent below average in 2016.
Both the south-west monsoon, between July and September, and the north-east monsoon, between October and December, failed. Kerala, a state to the west of Tamil Nadu, has struggled through its most severe drought in 115 years.
In Karnataka, a state to the north of Tamil Nadu, the drought is now in its third year. It is rare, but not unheard of, for both monsoon systems to fail in the south of the country. In times of drought, farmers in southern India tap into reservoirs to meet the shortfall. In some areas, however, these reserves are only expected to last for another 90 days. Preference has been given to using the remaining water for drinking, household use and industry instead of the very thirsty agricultural sector.
Analysis
Competition over water resources in southern India is likely to grow in coming years. Southern states, such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu, have embarked on industrialisation projects with mixed levels of success. These states are competing with China to become major textile producers. These ambitions are built on the relatively cheap cotton that is grown in the country, but recent years of erratic rainfall and low yields could threaten these plans.
Tamil Nadu relies on rain-fed rivers from Karnataka and Kerala for its surface water supply, but this arrangement has come under increased pressure in recent times. In September 2016, there were widespread protests as tensions rose between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu over the sharing of water from the Cauvery River. There are also fears that Kerala will withhold water from the Periyar River. Tamil Nadu has requested that Andhra Pradesh release more water from the Krishna River to service the drinking water needs of Chennai, a large city on the east coast of the state. Of the four south Indian states, Tamil Nadu is at the greatest risk of water insecurity due to its heavy reliance on the goodwill of its neighbours.
Chennai has experienced extreme water insecurity in the recent past. In 2003/04, its four reservoirs went dry and, as the city turned to groundwater reserves, these also declined. The city’s piped water supply was turned off and, apart from sporadic service, did not function for the best part of a year. During this time, the 4.5 million residents of Chennai required 600 million litres of water per day. To meet demand, water was transported from aquifers 150 kilometres from the city on trains and trucks.
As the failure of two consecutive monsoon seasons was blamed for the water shortage, the city turned to climate independent water sources. Three desalination plants have been built in Tamil Nadu since 2009, with a fourth, and possibly fifth, in the pipeline. City residents are worried about construction, maintenance and operating costs while the state’s high reliance on coal-powered electricity plants have also fuelled concerns about the effect additional desalination plants could have on Tamil Nadu.
The Minjur and Nemmeli desalination plants have operated since 2010 and 2013, respectively. Together, the two plants provide Chennai with up to 200 million litres of water per day. The third plant, commissioned in 2009, was built by the Chennai Petroleum Corporation to provide water for a local oil refinery.
A new plant at Perur will have a capacity of 150 million litres per day while a fifth will be able to produce up to 400 million litres per day. If all the planned plants are built, Chennai’s desalination capacity would increase to 750 million litres per day. Unless per capita demand for water has declined since 2003/04, this will not be enough to satisfy the 8.2 million people now living in the city in times of water scarcity.
As water levels in dams diminish, the region also faces a looming electricity crisis. Water reservoirs in Tamil Nadu are reportedly 82 per cent lower than normal. Poor water management is partly responsible for the state’s dire situation. In 2015, parts of the state, mainly around Chennai, flooded. Due to poorly maintained rainwater harvesting infrastructure, much of the water, which could have been harvested and stored for later use, was lost.
Desalination plants alone will do little to strengthen Tamil Nadu’s water security. While they will improve the resilience of Chennai in times of drought, and possible serve as a model for other Indian cities to emulate, they will not resolve the problems that arise when the city floods. Neither will they be capable of producing enough water at a cheap enough price to sustain the industrialisation of the region. If the state is serious about resolving its water security challenges it will also need to focus on demand-side solutions and repair and maintain its rainwater harvesting and drainage infrastructure.
Receive Daily Updates
Recent Posts
- Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund.
- LEAF is supported by transnational corporations (TNCs) like Unilever plc, Amazon.com, Inc, Nestle, Airbnb, Inc as well as Emergent, a US-based non-profit.
- The world lost more than 10 million hectares of primary tropical forest cover last year, an area roughly the size of Switzerland.
- Ending tropical and subtropical forest loss by 2030 is a crucial part of meeting global climate, biodiversity and sustainable development goals. Protecting tropical forests offers one of the biggest opportunities for climate action in the coming decade.
- Tropical forests are massive carbon sinks and by investing in their protection, public and private players are likely to stock up on their carbon credits.
- The LEAF coalition initiative is a step towards concretising the aims and objectives of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism.
- REDD+ was created by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It monetised the value of carbon locked up in the tropical forests of most developing countries, thereby propelling these countries to help mitigate climate change.
- It is a unique initiative as it seeks to help developing countries in battling the double-edged sword of development versus ecological commitment.
- The initiative comes at a crucial time. The tropics have lost close to 12.2 million hectares (mha) of tree cover last year according to global estimates released by Global Forest Watch.
- Of this, a loss of 4.2 mha occurred within humid tropical primary forests alone. It should come as no surprise that most of these lost forests were located in the developing countries of Latin America, Africa and South Asia.
- Brazil has fared dismally on the parameter of ‘annual primary forest loss’ among all countries. It has lost 1.7 mha of primary forests that are rich storehouse of carbon. India’s estimated loss in 2020 stands at 20.8 kilo hectares.
- Between 2002-2020, Brazil’s total area of humid primary forest reduced by 7.7 per cent while India’s reduced by 3.4 per cent.
- Although the loss in India is not as drastic as in Brazil, its position is nevertheless precarious. For India, this loss is equivalent to 951 metric tonnes worth carbon dioxide emissions released in the atmosphere.
- It is important to draw comparisons between Brazil and India as both countries have adopted a rather lackadaisical attitude towards deforestation-induced climate change. The Brazilian government hardly did anything to control the massive fires that gutted the Amazon rainforest in 2019.
- It is mostly around May that forest fires peak in India. However, this year India, witnessed massive forest fires in early March in states like Odisha, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh and Mizoram among others.
- The European Union’s Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service claimed that 0.2 metric tonnes of carbon was emitted in the Uttarakhand forest fires.
- Implementation of the LEAF Coalition plan will help pump in fresh rigour among developing countries like India, that are reluctant to recognise the contributions of their forest dwelling populations in mitigating climate change.
- With the deadline for proposal submission fast approaching, India needs to act swiftly on a revised strategy.
- Although India has pledged to carry out its REDD+ commitments, it is impossible to do so without seeking knowledge from its forest dwelling population.
Context:-
At the recently concluded Leaders’ Summit on Climate in April 2021, Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund plan that shall be offered to countries committed to arrest the decline of their tropical forests by 2030.
[wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]What is LEAF Coalition?
Why LEAF Coalition?
Brazil & India
According to the UN-REDD programme, after the energy sector, deforestation accounts for massive carbon emissions — close to 11 per cent — in the atmosphere. Rapid urbanisation and commercialisation of forest produce are the main causes behind rampant deforestation across tropical forests.
Tribes, Forests and Government
Disregarding climate change as a valid excuse for the fires, Indian government officials were quick to lay the blame for deforestation on activities of forest dwellers and even labelled them “mischievous elements” and “unwanted elements”.
Policy makers around the world have emphasised the role of indigenous tribes and local communities in checking deforestation. These communities depend on forests for their survival as well as livelihood. Hence, they understand the need to protect forests. However, by posing legitimate environmental concerns as obstacles to real development, governments of developing countries swiftly avoid protection of forests and rights of forest dwellers.
For instance, the Government of India has not been forthcoming in recognising the socio-economic, civil, political or even cultural rights of forest dwellers. According to data from the Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs in December, 2020 over 55 per cent of this population has still not been granted either individual or community ownership of their lands.
To make matters worse, the government has undertaken systematic and sustained measures to render the landmark Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 ineffective in its implementation. The Act had sought to legitimise claims of forest dwellers on occupied forest land.
Various government decisions have seriously undermined the position of indigenous people within India. These include proposing amendments to the obsolete Indian Forest Act, 1927 that give forest officials the power to take away forest dwellers’ rights and to even use firearms with impunity.
There is also the Supreme Court’s order of February, 2019 directing state governments to evict illegal encroachers of forest land or millions of forest dwellers inhabiting forests since generations as a measure to conserve wildlife. Finally, there is the lack of data on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) deaths among the forest dwelling population;
Tardy administration, insufficient supervision, apathetic attitude and a lack of political intent defeat the cause of forest dwelling populations in India, thereby directly affecting efforts at arresting deforestation.
Way Forward
Tuntiak Katan, a global indigenous leader from Ecuador and general coordinator of the Global Alliance of Territorial Communities, aptly indicated the next steps at the Climate Summit:
“The first step is recognition of land rights. The second step is the recognition of the contributions of local communities and indigenous communities, meaning the contributions of indigenous peoples.We also need recognition of traditional knowledge practices in order to fight climate change”
Perhaps India can begin by taking the first step.