Mapping of Coral Reef:-

Background:-

PROVe, The Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV), developed by National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), maps the coral reefs in Andaman & Nicobar Island.

Details:-

Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India are the hot-spots of biodiversity with their unique Coral Reef bio-reserve. In recent decades, they have been under constant threat due to global warming and sea level rise. Coral reef biodiversity at Andaman region, roughly around 11,000 sq.km., was seriously affected during the 2004 Tsunami event and also are undergoing the stress from the increasing sea surface temperature.

Currently, there is no mechanism other than Scuba diving to examine the corals and assess the extent of damage or rejuvenation that might be taking place since the great damages happened earlier. National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), for the first time, used the indigenously-developed Remotely Operated Vehicle (PROVe), to map the coral reefs in Andaman & Nicobar Islands (North Bay and Chidiyatapu) and that the ROV can be used for this purpose efficiently.

The ROV can effectively map 4-6 sq.km. of coral reefs in a day, whereas the same job takes about a week for a Scuba diver. The images of corals recorded by the ROV are useful to study the biodiversity of coral reefs and their evolution. The underwater visuals have shown the coral debris and boulders caused by the 2004 Tsunami, at the same time, also capturing some locations where the rejuvenation of the colonies of branching corals, stony coral, brain corals was observed. The water temperature ranged between 31oC at surface and 30.5oC at 1 m water depth. It further decreases in deeper waters as recorded by the ROV based sensor.

The radiometer attached on the ROV provided the spectral signatures of different types of corals in Andaman. The spectral signatures of the corals are valuable in developing algorithms to map the coral reefs using sensing techniques, especially the satellite remote sensing. A good news is that there are no evidences of coral bleaching at Andaman reef during the mapping period in April 2016 but will require constant monitoring to know what would happen when the temperature raises further.

Coral Reef:-

Corals are minute invertebrates, yet they can build vast reefs such as the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, which is the largest natural structure in the ocean. How is a coral reef formed?

Reef building begins in a very simple way. The coral larva settling on a hard substratum begins to grow into one colony by repeated budding. This colony continues to grow vertically towards the sea surface and laterally as far as they can.

Besides corals, several other organisms in the reef, notably the mollusks and some algae, called calcareous algae, also construct calcium skeletons. When these organisms die, the calcium first dissolves and then re-solidifies to form a rock, on which new corals come and settle. Thus between every birth and death scenario, the reef continues to grow. On an average a reef grows by 1 mm per year.

What is the difference between coral growth and reef growth ?

A coral may grow 1 cm or even 10 cm in a year but that does not fill up the space between the corals or even the space between the branches of a coral. A reef, on the other hand, is a solid wall with all spaces totally filled up with calcareous material. It is the cementing process that takes time – that is why the reef grows much slower than the corals.

Are all reefs the same?

No. To answer this question we should first see how the reefs are formed: at the beginning, the corals settle and grow near the coastline, often growing almost up to the edge of the shore (high water level). At this stage they are called fringing reefs because they border on the land.

As the corals can now grow only seaward, they start propagating in that direction. In the process, they create a gap between the shoreline and reef. This space, generally with less number of coral colonies, becomes the lagoon. At this stage of its evolution, the reef is called a barrier reef. 

If the corals happen to be growing around an island and if the island happened to sink below the sea surface, then the reef structure would resemble a ring around the non-existing island. The place once occupied by the island becomes the lagoon and the reef is then called an atoll

So, all these types occur near the continents?

Yes, except atolls. They occur in mid-oceans, as in Lakshadweep, or on continental shelves at several hundred meters depth. Quite often, these atolls grow on top of extinct volcanoes.

Then how do islands form on atolls?

When corals die or break, their skeleton is broken down gradually to fine sand particles. The winds and wave action then move them to one side of the atoll where they accumulate. When the top of this sand bank is at level with the sea surface, vegetation like coconut settles there and grows. The vegetation binds more sand and this gradually leads to the formation of islands

Are there other types of reefs?

Yes, but they are less important and not widespread in distribution.

  • A patch reef refers to a small patch of colonies, smaller in size than a fringing reef.
  • A table reef looks like a table of coral colonies placed on the sea floor.
  • A ridge reef, as the name implies, is a long ridge of corals.
  • A micro- atoll is an atoll-like reef structure within a major atoll.

What are the reef types found in India?

The fringing reefs and the atolls.

Fringing reefs are common. They occur around the islands in the Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of Kachchh, Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

The reefs in the Lakshadweep group of islands are oceanic atolls.

Barrier reefs are not known form Indian seas though there was a record of such a reef off Andamans in the 1920s. This has never been reconfirmed.

Are there coral reefs on the central east and west coasts of India?

No. The conditions here, especially salinity and high sediment load, are not ideal for coral growth. Most major rivers of India, like the Ganges, flow into the sea on the east coast, bringing in lots of sediments that would not allow the corals to grow. On the west coast, the monsoon is intense from June to August. The fresh water flow into the sea at this time reduces salinity to less than half of the normal and the sea water becomes murky brownish with the sediments.

Was it always like this?

No. There were coral reefs along the west coast some 18,000 years ago. These reefs got drowned (sank below the lighted layers) when the sea level started rising fast during the last glacial ice melt.

Some reefs later started growing near the coast but the change of climate to monsoon style some 6000 years ago killed them also.

Not all of them are lost, however. Some die-hard stragglers have managed to reach the shore and grow there. We can see them as isolated patches on the coast. They do not, however, form reef structures and will not be able to do so in the near future.

Are there other ways in which reefs can get killed?

In the course of natural geological events, a reef may sometimes get lifted above the sea surface.

The earth’s surface is not one single plate but is made up of number of plates that fit together. These plates constantly push against each other and if one plate near the coast overrides another, then the reef on it gets raised above sea surface and dies.

There are two such raised reefs in India – one in Ramanathapuram in Tamil Nadu and another in Okhamandal in Gujarat. Both these reefs were raised and died some 5000 years ago.

Is there anything special about present day Indian reefs?

Yes, specifically with those of the Gulf of Kachchh.

The reefs here are the most northern in India. The temperature variations here are high, from 15 to 30°C. The salinity goes above normal seawater salinity for several months. The area experiences high tidal amplitude, which leave corals exposed for several hours at times. The strong tidal currents also stir up inorganic sediments.

In spite of these adverse conditions, corals still thrive in the Kachchh region. The biodiversity of the corals, and that of the reefs as a whole, however, is much less than in other reefs.

What has this biodiversity got to do with coral reefs?

You know that diversity means variety. Biodiversity means the variety of animals and plants that live together at one place or in an ecosystem. The higher the biodiversity, the more mature and stable an ecosystem is and higher its biological productivity is.

Coral reefs have the greatest biodiversity of all marine ecosystems. In a typical reef you’ll find corals, snails, clams, sponges, anemones, crabs, worms, starfish, shrimps, lobsters, sea cucumbers, sea lilies, fish such as groupers, snappers, breams, surgeonfish, damselfish, butterflyfish, parrotfish, clownfish and a number of other highly coloured ornamental fish, sharks, turtles, dolphins, green algae, brown algae, red algae, sea grasses and dozens of other animal and plant groups that you’ve not even heard of. And all of them represented by dozens of species!

Sounds great! So I can see all of them when I go to the reef.

No, you won’t. Not in one visit, not even in several. You need to go to a reef many times before you can see even half of them. Still better if you can dive, since some animals like soft corals live only below 5 m depth. You also need some experience in recognizing them for what they are.

Well, you can at least tell me what can I expect to see in the reef the first time.

Let us begin with corals. If you are on the shore, of course, you will see only sand. But if you swim out into the lagoon or take a small boat you’ll begin to see clumps and bushes of stag horn corals. Between them you may find some massive corals. The closer you go near the reef; the corals will become abundant and more varied. You may also see the mushroom corals at times. On the reef flat, you may not find much except few flower corals and creeping ones; outside the reef, on the seaward slope, the coral abundance will again become high. If you are a good snorkeler or a scuba diver you could go further down and experience the wonder of corals even more.

What else would I see?

Snails and clams. Have you seen the cowrie shells sold as souvenirs in many curio shops? Well, down there you can see them live, glossy and brightly coloured. You can also see large ones like strombus or trochus shells often.

There is one clam that is particularly interesting. It is the giant clam Tridacna. This clam does not move but gets embedded between rocks, cements itself there and grows. It is the largest clam known and individuals of half a meter length are common in our reefs. The biggest ones, such as those from Pacific atolls, can even weigh up to half a ton. This clam, like the corals, also harbours zooxanthellae.

Be careful when you go near them, don’t put your finger or toe between their valves. The muscles that close the shells are so powerful that your fingers can be snapped off like matchsticks.

Some snails like limpets have no shells. These are brightly coloured and look attractive on the coral rocks. You can also see octopus darting in between the corals..

Can I see lots of fish also?

Yes, that is what attracts most people to the reefs. The variety in number, size and shape is almost endless. Not all of them are so common. The butterfly fish are the most abundant, you are almost certain to see them in the first dip in the water.

If you float silently near large coral blocks, you’ll also see a number of other brightly coloured fish. And if you see an anemone you are certain to see the yellow and red clown fish darting between its tentacles.

The polka-dotted moray eel is also a common sight. It hides in crevices and only its head comes out in search of food. Be careful with your fingers – the teeth of the moray eels are razor-sharp.

If you are wading in shallow water or reef-walking, then it would be a sensible idea to wear thick canvas shoes. You may step on a sting ray, a scorpion fish or a stone fish and end up with pain and swelling for several days.

Is there any other animal I might enjoy looking at?

The dolphins. You can see them quite often frolicking near the reefs.

Are all these animals and plants the same in all our reefs?

Not necessarily. Some reef areas have their own unique species. If you go to Andamans you’ll see the salt-water crocodile near the reefs. You can also see the giant sea anemone here, which is at least half a meter across. You don’t see them in atolls.

One more question. Are there any dangerous animals in a reef?

No, not the ones that cause fatal harm. Contact with some corals can cause skin allergies and irritation. Sting by some fish can be painful for some days. Even scratching your unprotected legs or arms against corals can cause cuts and sores but not death.

There is one animal you should be vigilant against. It is the box jellyfish. Its sting is fatal. Fortunately we don’t see it near our reefs. It is more common in Pacific reefs but who knows, you may one day go to see those reefs also. You should, because each reef you visit can be a new wonderful experience.

Let us talk about what coral reefs can give us. Tell me something about that.

 

Reefs abound with food fish. Most of them live in the lagoon. Some fish like tuna and sharks live outside the reef but come closer to the reef to feed on the small fish. The biological productivity of the reefs is very high. We can get from a unit reef area as much fish as from rich fishing grounds like the Peruvian upwelling known for record anchovy catches.

But I don’t see any major fishing units near the reef.

Fortunately, it is not easy to catch all reef fish as we do elsewhere with trawlers and seiners. The nature of the rocky bottom, presence of corals that can tear away the nets and the abrupt variations in depth, guarantee that no fishing net of mass catches can be used in a reef. Most of the fish can be caught only with lines or traps. Often what can be caught this way is more than enough for local needs.

What about the small colourful fish? We can’t eat them, of course.

No, but we can sell them to aquarium hobbyists. The ornamental fish from reefs are far more colourful and diverse than those from freshwaters. The demand for these fish worldwide is so great that it is a lucrative industry in several third world countries. The Philippines is known to export every year aquarium fish worth several million dollars from her reefs.

What else is edible?

The sea weeds, if you have a liking for them! In India, we don’t eat them but some of these weeds are used for producing jellies, agar and cosmetics. There is a good potential for collecting seaweeds from the reef or even cultivating them in the lagoon. In some reef areas the local people relish the Octopus and the giant clam.

What other useful things has the reef to offer us?

The corals themselves, of course. In most of the villages bordering coral reefs, houses are built only with coral stones and mortar from coral debris. Even whitewashing is done with coral lime paste. At an industrial level, the coral sand rich in calcium is a potential raw material for the cement industry.

Most often corals, particularly the branching ones, are also collected and sold as souvenirs. Curio shops near the reefs have stocks of them though it is forbidden.

I have also seen shells being sold.

Yes. The cowrie shells are the most popular though a large variety of other shells are also sold. Some shells are collected for industrial purposes.

Do you know that, before the advent of plastics, even shirt buttons were made from the trochus shells?

Some large shells are cut and polished and sold as ornaments and bangles, ear-rings, studs, necklaces, pendants, finger-rings etc. This is again a large industry in the Indo-Pacific reefs, generating several million dollars worth of business every year.

I read sometime back that corals can also be used as transplants. Is that correct?

Yes. A substance for use as bone transplant should have nearly the same chemical composition as the bone, should be tough to give mechanical strength and at the same time porous enough to allow fine blood vessels to pass through. Among the several bio-materials, corals like the massive Goniopora are the best choice. Either we can cut a bone-shaped structure from the coral and use it as a transplant or better still, convert the skeletal material to hydroxyapatite, which is the mineral component of the bone. This forms a bond directly with the bone and hence can be used as a bone-replacing material; on implantation, this promotes new bone growth. Coral skeletons also find use in dental applications, as materials to fill in cavities.

Can we get medicines from corals?

Not from hard corals, though some Ayurvedic preparations may include them. Most other organisms like soft corals, sponges, bryozoans, sea slugs, pufferfish secrete compounds that are bio-active. It is like this. In a coral reef space is at a premium. Every organism tends to protect its space and when others encroach, it secretes some compounds to repulse them. These are basically antibiotics but may prove useful drugs for some human ailments. The possibility of discovering novel products from these organisms has generated considerable interest worldwide. In India, NIO is doing research in this area for the last two decades. Some products extracted from sponges and soft corals have shown anti-viral properties.

What else can we get from reefs?

Protection to our coasts. The reefs are natural walls that stop the strong waves and storm surges from reaching the shores. That is how the lagoon is calm even when the sea outside the reef is rough. This prevents shore erosion. This type of protection is critical to the islands. Most of our coral islands are small and low-lying. Even little erosion can affect them dramatically.

Impressive! Can you put all these together and tell me what is the worth of a reef in hard currency?

Difficult to say because the extent of uses varies from reef to reef. Besides, the economic value of an activity is determined by cultural beliefs and traditions. For example, the entire population in Lakshadweep practise Islam which forbids them eating crustaceans. So lobster-fishing, which elsewhere is a lucrative industry, is non-existent here.

On an average, the total economic value, in terms of extractive uses, is about US $2750 per hectare reef area per year. Globally, all the reefs together (62 million hectares) have therefore a resource use value of about US $170 billion  per year. This is only a potential estimate since not all reefs are accessible at present.

Indian reefs cover an estimated area of about one lakh hectares. However, it is unlikely that more than 10% of them are used at present. Even at this level, the economic value of our reefs could be about US $30 million (about 120 crore Indian rupees). But this is only half the story.

This is very interesting. Tell me what is the other half?

Tourism. What the reefs can offer you by way of aesthetics, recreation, and adventure cannot be matched by any other ecosystem, except perhaps tropical rain forests. Tourism to coral reefs is a massive industry worldwide involving transporters, hoteliers, boat crew, diving gear operators, guides and a host of other auxiliary services. The current estimate of the economic value of coral reefs from this source alone is as much as that from other uses, and together can take the total economic value of coral reefs to more than 350 billion US $ a year. If the present trend is any indication, it is ever- increasing.

The coral reefs must pay for being so rich, do they?

Yes, they do. But not all damages are man-made. Some are natural and at least one cause was natural in the beginning but got aggravated by human activities later.

What is the natural threat that has been aggravated by human activities?

Predation by the crown- This is an interesting story.

The starfish is normally present in the reefs in very low numbers. The triton snail feeds on the young ones of the starfish and thus keeps the population of the starfish in check. But when we started harvesting triton shells in commercial quantities, there were not enough snails left to feed on the young starfish. The latter started growing in proliferation and their feeding on corals increased dramatically.

That was how many reefs got totally devastated by the starfish outbreak.

This is an example of how unregulated human activities can aggravate natural damages, even indirectly.

Was there any other natural event that caused as much damage?

Yes, the unusual summer warming of the year 1998. Even in tropical seas, temperature changes follow a seasonal cycle, with increase in summer. Sometimes corals react to this increase in temperature by expelling their zooxanthellae. As a consequence the corals lose their colour and look white. This is called bleaching.

Bleaching is a common phenomenon in most coral reefs in summer but never reaches a severe degree. The bleached corals usually recover their colour once the temperature comes back to normal. The temperature increase in these instances is generally less than 1 degree and lasts for only a few days or may be a week or two.

During the1998 summer, however, a vast layer of warm surface waters spread over the whole tropical region. As a result, the temperature increased by 2 degrees higher than the seasonal maximum and persisted for several weeks. This was too much for corals. Most of them, in particular the branching corals which are more sensitive, got bleached and died, eventually leaving vast stretches of the reefs barren..

More than 40 countries reported impacts varying from moderate to severe. In India, Andaman and Nicobar reefs were the most severely affected (up to 80% death of corals) followed by Lakshadweep (40%-80%) and Gulf of Mannar (60%) reefs.

What other natural causes affect corals?

Exposure. Corals living in the intertidal zones get periodically exposed to atmosphere. This lasts generally 1-2 hours and all the coral species can withstand this exposure. But in regions of high tidal amplitude, as in the Gulf of Kachchh, this exposure can last several hours. If this also happens to coincide with sunny weather, then it can kill corals. Fortunately, this does not happen often.

Do corals also must breakdown at one time or other?

Yes, they do. A coral colony is home to many animals and plants but some of them are not that grateful! The mollusks, worms and sponges are notorious – they bore into the coral skeleton to make their homes there. In the process they weaken the skeleton and make it susceptible to mechanical breakdown by wave action.

So, waves also affect corals.

Yes, continuous pounding by waves on the fore reef and reef flat kills many corals there. That is why you find lots of rubble and less of live corals there. But if the wave action is very strong, as during hurricanes, corals even several meters below can also be broken to pieces or uprooted by the waves. Hurricane damages are common with Pacific reefs but rare in Indian reefs.

Well, these are known threats. Are there potential threats?

Yes, one such is the sea level rise. You may remember that we said entire reefs got drowned in the past because of a rise in sea level. But this happened over many centuries.

In the present century, this is happening in decades. We are burning so much of coal and oil that the carbon di-oxide concentration in the atmosphere is increasing rapidly. This causes the earth to warm up which in turn causes polar ice caps to melt. This makes the sea level to rise at a rate higher than the reef growth. If this continues then the coral reefs will be drown.

But I read that the sea level is not rising as much as we thought earlier, is that right?

Nobody knows for certain. It is possible that the rate of sea level rise is reduced now but it does not seem to have reversed. There are different possible scenarios, from low to high rates of rise.

The atolls will be the most affected; even if they grow faster, they may not be able to cope up with projected sea level rise in the next century. The fringing and barrier reefs may fare better, keeping up with the sea level rise up to mid-range projection. In any case, the threat is real but its magnitude is difficult to gauge now.

Will this have serious fall-outs?

In the case of mainland, the protection offered to the coasts by the reefs would be lost. There will be increased erosion and land loss. In the case of islands like those of the Lakshadweep, the situation will be still worse. These low-lying islands, hardly a meter or two above sea surface now, can get drowned completely.

But are there man-made effects that have immediate impacts?

Yes, the most important among them is coral mining. Very often, corals are removed and used to build houses and produce lime. For most of the coastal villagers, this comes free from the sea and they have no qualms in taking away as much as possible. Unfortunately, they make no distinction between dead and live corals.

As a result, several large patches of low-lying reefs are totally lost. This impact is most serious in the Gulf of Mannar reefs, especially near the coastal villages and towns like Mandapam and Tuticorin.

But these are only local impacts and people do need some coral stones, don’t they?

Well, if the removal is only moderate and restricted only to dead corals, like coral debris, then perhaps the impacts could be minimized. But most often, people do not make any distinction between dead and live corals, nor do they respect any limit for extraction. And if the extraction is on an industrial scale, then it could be catastrophic.

Did you know that the extraction of coral sands in Gulf of Kachchh was leased out to a cement company in the eighties? Every year about a million tonnes of coralline material, including live corals, were dredged out, killing a large portion of the reefs in the process. Fortunately better sense prevailed and this lease was not renewed. But then the damage was already done the loss of coral cover was in excess of 50% at most of the reefs in the leased area.

But can’t we allow some corals to be collected as souvenirs? I’d like to take a coral home.

That is precisely the problem. If each one of us want a coral like that, we would then need one billion corals. Not even all the world reefs put together can satisfy this need!

And again, we all want the beautiful branching corals.

That means the removal is selective, affecting the biodiversity. Some fish which live only with the branching corals will also disappear and the very beauty of the reef will be lessened. What do you prefer – looking at the colourful corals in all their splendour in the reefs or their bleached skeletons in the showcases?

Okay, I get your point. But don’t tell me I can’t even catch some fish to eat!

You can, as long as you use a line or a trap or a harpoon. If you resort to other methods, then it is a different story

How?

Some methods used for fishing in reefs are highly destructive.

In one such method the fishermen dive to the reef floor and release a poison. The fish in the surrounding area get narcotized and float to the surface where they are collected. What is not seen is the death of all other organisms near the site where the poison is released.

In a similar way, some fishermen use dynamites underwater. The fish get stunned with the shock waves and float to the surface. The damage in this case is much more intensive. All corals in the vicinity of the blast are smashed to bits. In both these methods of destructive fishing, damages are not visible to the casual observer and often the impact goes unnoticed until it is too late.

Are such methods practiced in India?

Fortunately, no. The fish poison (generally called Rotenone) or the dynamite material is not easily available to ordinary fishermen. Some fishermen, however, use poisons extracted from locally available plants and animals.

But I am sure some forms of fishing practiced in India that is more destructive than productive, is it not?

Yes, it is the practice of collection of live baits and the ornamental fish. The live-bait fish are used in pole and line tuna fishing. The ornamental fish are collected for sales. Both these groups of fish usually live between the coral branches or around the coral colonies.

The fishermen encircle large patches of corals with fine mesh cloth or net and hit on the corals to chase the fish out. In the process of collecting these fish worth a few hundred rupees, colonies of corals growing for several years are killed.

Are there unintentional damages associated with fishing?

Yes, the most common and the most serious one is that made by anchors.

Most of the fishermen, when they go for reef fishing, anchor their boats in the shallow parts of the reefs. Quite often the anchor falls on the corals and if the boat drifts, then the anchor and the chain get dragged over the corals, breaking the branches or even uprooting entire colonies. In the case of large ships that anchor near the reefs for passenger and cargo traffic, the damage can be enormous. Imagine what would happen if a 20 to 30 ton giant broom sweeps the reef?

What other human activities affect corals?

Pollution. Corals are very sensitive to oil and metal pollution. If a reef happens to be near the effluent discharge point of any industry or near a harbour, then the reef is practically doomed.

Even seemingly unrelated onshore activities can kill corals. For example:

  • Logging is a major land-based industry in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. As a result, huge quantities of mud and silt are washed off every monsoon on to the coastal zones. These settle on corals and kill them by smothering.
  • In the Gulf of Kachchh lots of mangroves have been cut. The mangroves have a mud – binding capacity. When the mangroves are cut, the mud-binding capacity is lost and the mud gets washed on to corals. This is a major cause of death of nearshore corals in this region
  • Thermal pollution, like hot water discharge from the cooling towers of industries or power plants near the reefs, can also kill them

Does atomic radiation affect corals? I remember that some reefs in the Pacific were used as nuclear bomb test sites by USA and France.

We don’t know for certain about radiation effects because these sites are not accessible to civilian scientists. Undoubtedly, the shock waves of nuclear explosion must have killed corals. How much? Nobody would tell us that or let us find out.

The corals must be living a miserable life, aren’t they?

From every angle, yes.

Even when you pay a visit to them you make their life miserable! The hotels meant to provide lodging for you may be built of coral stones, or may even be built on the reefs so that you don’t have to go too far to see them! With the tourism industry, comes the pollution – sewage, oil, plastics and other solid wastes.

Even your reef walking can be harmful to corals; you may inadvertently step on them and break off their branches.

When I first saw a coral, I thought that it was a plant. Is that right ?

I am not surprised. Most first-time visitors to a reef tend to think of the corals as plants because they remain fixed to rocks, are colourful to look at, and many of the branched ones resemble small trees. In reality, a coral is a simple animal like the sea anemone we find on rocky beaches. Unlike the anemone, the coral animal is generally small and constructs a skeleton around its body for protection. A coral animal is also called a polyp.

Are polyp and coral the same?

No. The term coral is usually denotes the skeleton though at times the polyp is also called coral animal

What does a polyp look like?

Each polyp is a hollow cylinder of tissues with tentacles and a central mouth opening at the top. In a coral colony, a thin layer of tissue joins the adjacent polyps to each other. The central part of the cylinder has filaments called mesenteries. They serve like the stomach to absorb the food and also have gonads that produce male and female gametes (reproductive cells).

The size of the polyp ranges from about 0.5 mm to 20 mm in diameter, though there are exceptions. The size of the polyp ranges from about 0.5 mm to 20 mm in diameter, though there are exceptions.

How does the polyp make its skeleton?

The external surface of the polyp has some special cells called calicoblasts that can take dissolved calcium from seawater and construct a solid skeleton. The skeleton thus looks like a cup with side walls, a bottom and open at the top.

If the polyp is so small, then how come some corals look so big?

What you look at and think is a coral is not one coral but a number of them growing together. If you look at a coral piece closely you will find a lot of pores on it. Each one was the place where one individual polyp lived. Every coral colony begins as a minute skeleton of one single polyp and then keeps on growing by adding more and more individuals.

If all coral colonies start from a single polyp, then how come there are so many varieties?

Genetic diversity comes to play its role here. You know the tiger, the cat and the lion all belong to the same genus, yet are so different. Similarly, the shape and size of a coral colony is genetically determined. The forms that we commonly see are:-

– massive (stone-like),
– foliaceous (leaf-like),
– branching (tree-like or flower like), and
– encrusting (coating-like).

At times, water depth and light may also control the shape. At greater depths, the pressure is high and the coral skeleton tends to grow more flatter. The growth forms also change because the corals are continuously on the look-out for light.

How does sunlight affect the growth of a coral?

Here we come to an interesting aspect of coral life. All corals that we see on a reef have microscopic plants (called Zooxanthellae) living inside their cells. These algae have chlorophyll pigments and produce organic matter by photosynthesis. For this, they need light. So the coral has to remain near the surface where the sunlight is abundant.

The colour of the corals, in fact, comes from the algal pigments. If the algae were not there, then the coral tissue would be a transparent layer through which we could even see the skeleton

How has the coral acquired the algae and why should it tolerate them?

Nobody knows how the algae came to live inside the animal cells. In fact, these algae are also found in some clams and worms. When the algae live with the animals, both are benefited.

The algae produce organic matter by photosynthesis but do not use all of it. Some portion of this is passed on to corals for their nourishment. The corals, like all animals, excrete nitrogen and phosphorous salts and carbon -di-oxide. All these are needed for photosynthesis by algae and are readily taken up by them.

The presence of zooxanthellae also enhances coral growth. When they photosynthesize, they remove carbon- di-oxide. This reduces the acidic conditions at the sites where calcium is deposited by the corals. This in turn retards calcium dissolution, thus enhancing precipitation of calcium and coral skeletal growth. The mode of living together by two organisms with mutual benefit like this is called symbiosis.

Interesting. Then corals do not need any other food, is that right?

No, not totally. What they can get from their algae cannot satisfy all their needs. In fact, corals are basically carnivorous. They catch tiny animals from seawater and swallow them. That is their main food. What they get from the algae is only supplementary.

Some corals can also feed on detritus (dead organic matter) and some others can take up dissolved organic matter directly from seawater. Corals are thus versatile in their feeding habits. This is what helps them to survive and thrive in oceanic deserts.

So corals will have to move in search of food?

No. As their skeleton remains fixed to the rocky bases in the reef or the lagoon, the corals cannot move. Instead the food comes to them, along with the water currents.

Corals feed on tiny microscopic animals called plankton. These animals drift along with currents and when they pass close by, the corals catch them with their tentacles, sting them with their stinging cells, paralyze them by injecting venom and swallow them.

All corals are nocturnal; they become active feeders at night, when the plankton animals come to the surface layer from deep waters to where they go during daytime. If you dive in a reef at night, you will be surprised to see how active the corals are – a totally contrasting picture from the daytime when they are withdrawn into their skeletal cavities.

What are these stinging cells?

All corals have cells called nematocysts in their tentacles and near the mouth. These nematocysts have a central space filled with a venomous substance, a long coil through which the venom can flow and barbs on the coil to hold the prey tight. The stinging cells come in at least 20 varieties – small, big, long, short but all have only one function.

Don’t the corals move even for short distances?

Not the ones that are colonial and remain cemented to the bottom. Only one coral, the mushroom coral, can move for short distances. Incidentally, mushroom corals are single polyps that can grow up to 30 or 40 cm and lead a solitary life. In colonial corals, the polyps rarely exceed a cm in diameter.

Are there other solitary corals?

Yes, some deep-water corals are solitary. If you recall, we said that corals need light and hence they remain near the surface of the sea. These corals, having zooxanthellae, are also called hermatypic corals. They can be seen only in tropical and subtropical seas. These are the ones that form the coral reefs.

Some other corals, called ahermatypes, do not have zooxanthellae. Therefore they do not need light and can live in deep waters upto depths of 1000 or 2000 meters. These corals generally lead a solitary life and if they happen to form colonies, they are usually small with only a few individuals. The ahermatypic corals also occur in all latitudes.

Does temperature promote the development of coral reefs?

Yes. The reef building corals require warm temperatures for their survival. They grow well at temperatures greater than 20°C and can thrive even at 35°C as in the Red Sea, Persian Gulf or our Gulf of Kachchh.

Some of them occur sometimes at low temperatures, even down to 10°C, but they do not form reefs. It is because of this preference for warm waters, that the greatest number of corals is found in the tropical belt, with a decrease towards the subtropical seas.

Are there other conditions that effect coral growth?

Yes. Several but at least 3 of them are important:

(a) Firm substratum to settle

Corals need natural surfaces like rocks, coral stones or even molluscan shells to settle and grow. We rarely find profuse coral settlement on man-made structures like jetties or tetrapods though metallic structures like hulls of sunken boats and ships favour coral settlements.

(b) Salinity

Seawater contains 35 g of dissolved salts per liter whereas freshwater has only a few mg of dissolved salts. This saltiness is called salinity. Corals need this salinity to grow well. At times, corals can withstand some decrease in salinity (perhaps down to 30 g of salts per liter) for sometime (a few weeks to one or two months) but not more than that.

(c) Water clarity

When the waters are turbid, inorganic particles keep on falling on corals, but the corals cannot escape from this particle rain by moving away or by closing the skeleton. If the particle rain is less intense, corals can still clean themselves by ciliary movements but at high turbid conditions, the cleaning mechanism cannot cope and the corals eventually die of smothering.

The sedimentation also has an indirect effect – it reduces light penetration in the sea, thus reducing photosynthesis by zooxanthellae and the coral growth. This does not, however, kill the corals.

You said that a polyp grows into a colony by adding individuals. How does this happen?

This happens by budding, which is an asexual method of reproduction. In this case, the first polyp buds off a second one, which buds off another one and so on. The colony thus keeps growing. Budding can be either intratentacular or extratentacular, depending on the coral species: in the former, the offspring is first produced by division of a polyp within its own skeleton and then separated from the mother polyp by a skeletal wall. In the latter, the mother polyp produces a bud outside its skeleton. This bud later secrets it’s own skeleton.

Do the corals reproduce sexually also, like other animals? Are there mating rituals?

Yes, they do. Each polyp is a hermaphrodite and can produce both male and female gametes. At certain phases of the moon, the corals release synchronously the male and female gametes into the surrounding seawater. Though there are no sexual manifestations beforehand, this comes as close to as being called a mating ritual. The gametes unite and produce a larva called planula. This swims around for a few days, looking for a hard substratum to settle. Once settled, this starts reproduction by budding to form a new coral colony.

How long corals live?

It is a difficult question to answer. When the polyps reproduce by asexual means, the growth can be endless. Some large coral colonies have been known to be as old as 100-200 years.

How fast the corals grow?

Very slowly! The massive ones like the brain corals (the ones that resemble, in form, the human brain) grow no more than a cm per year. This is because the calcium carbonate deposition is a slow process and the growth occurs in all directions. The branching corals are relatively fast- growing. Some of them can grow as much as 18 to 20 cm per year but their skeletons are less dense than those of the massive ones.

You mentioned that some coral colonies could be more than 100 years old. If the growth of corals is so slow then how can you make out their age?

The growth of a coral is not uniform throughout the year. At certain times, when warm conditions with abundant sunlight prevail, coral grows fast. At other times, when there is heavy rain during monsoon, its growth slows down. When a coral grows fast, it deposits more calcium into the skeleton, which becomes dense. When the growth is slow, calcium deposition becomes lighter. If we x-ray a coral skeleton, these regions would appear as dark and light bands. Since seasonal changes, such as those between warm and rainy months occur generally once in a year, a dark and light band together would correspond to one year’s growth. If we take a portion of a coral colony and count the number of dark or light bands, then we will know its age.

What else can the bands tell us, apart from age?

While the corals deposit calcium, they also include with it a variety of materials, like metals, humic acids and some natural elements like carbon and oxygen. Among these, humic acids come from land sources and are brought into the coastal waters by river flow. So, the more the rainfall, the more humic acids come with the river flow, the more their abundance in the coral skeleton. When we look at a coral skeleton under ultra-violet light, we can see the presence of humic acids as fluorescent bands. The intensity of fluorescence thus is an index of rainfall. Knowing the age from the growth band at the location of the fluorescent band, we can deduce whether the monsoon was strong or weak – at that time.

Interesting. Do these bands tell us anything more?

Yes. You know, most elements have isotopes i.e. atoms that are slightly different from the most common ones. Oxygen has two isotopes: a lighter one (016 ) which is common and a heavier one (018 ). At higher temperatures the lighter isotopes escape from the seawater leaving the heavier ones behind. So if we find heavier isotopes of oxygen in a coral skeleton at a particular growth band, then we can conclude that the sea temperature was higher in that year. If we know how much more of heavier isotopes were there, then we can even deduce how much higher the temperature was.

Corals can thus act as indicators of past climate changes.

Are there natural enemies to corals?

Yes, some fish, in particular the parrotfish, feed on corals. These have powerful teeth with which they can snip off pieces of coral skeleton along with the polyp tissues and ingest them. The butterfly fish also feed on corals but since their teeth are not as strong, they just nibble the corals. There is one more predator that is more dangerous to corals. It is the crown-of-thorns starfish. It exclusively feeds on corals. Unlike the fish which bite or nibble parts of the corals, this starfish envelops the whole coral with its arms and sucks out all of the coral tissue, leaving only the bare skeleton.

Do corals suffer from diseases?

Yes. At least two diseases are known so far to affect corals. The first is the black band disease, which is widely prevalent. The cause for this is infection with a bacterium. Coral tissues affected by this disease become blackish and look like a dark band among healthy tissues. The less prevalent white band disease causes the affected tissues to look like a white band around the lesion. The organism responsible for this disease is not known at present. Recently NIO scientists recorded another disease, the pink line disease, from some corals in Lakshadweep. Though the cause for this is also not known, it is suspected that the mortality associated with the 1998 El Nino event has a role in this.

How many species of corals are found in the world?

At a best count, somewhere between 800 to1000 species. Nobody knows exactly how many because we don’t know all of them. We may not know yet those corals that live in deeper waters or remote reef areas. Sometimes the same coral species is called by different names in different countries. However, we can safely say that at least 800 species are known so far.

How many coral species occur in India? Are there any corals unique to India?

206 species of corals are known from Indian reefs, with a majority of them occurring in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Some coral species such as Porites mannarensis are unique to India. This is natural because we can’t expect all species to be cosmopolitan in distribution.

Is the precious red coral one among them?

We are so much used to the idea of red coral in jewelry, we tend to think it should be unique to India! The red coral, called Corallum rubrum, is not a reef coral at all. It is a stony coral without zooxanthellae. The red colour comes from natural pigmentation of the skeleton that remains even after the death of the polyp. Again, unlike the reef corals that are porous (with cavities in the skeleton), the red coral is dense and compact. So, it can be shaped or machined without breakage. That is how coral beads are cut for jewelry. The red coral occurs only in the Mediterranean Sea and off Japan from shallow depths up to 1000 meters. They are collected by dragging wooden frames over seabed and breaking off the branches. Some fishermen from Mediterranean coasts are also known to collect them by skin diving. Like the red corals, the black corals and blue corals also retain the colour after death.

Are there other corals that are different from the ones we see on a reef?

Yes, there are several of them. They resemble the true corals but do not have zooxanthellae. They occur sometimes in profusion in deeper parts of the reefs. The fire coral, tree coral, wire coral, sea fan and sea fern are some such corals.

Some cousins of the stony corals are called soft corals. These are large ones, several cm in diameter: they lack a true skeleton but have spicules (spiny material) in their tissues which give them a leathery and tough consistency. Soft corals also occur profusely in most coral reefs. They are an interesting group of animals because several of them are sources of bioactive compounds.

This end the Coral Story , hope you have got all your doubts clarified.


 

Share is Caring, Choose Your Platform!

Recent Posts

    Context

    Sunil Mittal, the chairman of Bharti Airtel, said recently that it would be “tragic” if India’s telecom-access market was to be reduced to only two competing operators. He was probably referring to the possible exit of the financially-stressed Vodafone Idea and the increasing irrelevance of government-owned operators, BSNL and MTNL. This would essentially leave the market to Reliance Jio and Airtel. A looming duopoly, or the exit of a global telecommunications major, are both worrying. They deserve a careful and creative response.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    Thus Far

    • India’s telecom market has seen monopoly as well as hyper-competition.
    • Twenty-five years ago, the government alone could provide services.
    • Ten years later, there were nearly a dozen competing operators.
    • Most service areas now have four players.
    • The erstwhile monopolies, BSNL and MTNL, are now bit players and often ignored.

    The reduced competition is worrying. Competition has delivered relatively low prices, advanced technologies, and an acceptable quality of services. These gains are now at risk. There is a long way to go in expanding access as well as network capacity.

    The Indian Telecom Irony

    • India is ranked second globally—after China—in the number of people connected to the internet. However, it is also first in the number of people unconnected.
    • Over 50% of Indians are not connected to the internet, despite giant strides in network reach and capacity.
    • India’s per capita or device data usage is low. It has an impressive 4G mobile network. However, its fixed network—wireline or optical fibre—is sparse and often poor.
    • 5G deployment has yet to start and will be expensive.

    Vodafone Tragedy

    Filling the gaps in infrastructure and access will require large investments and competition. The exit of Vodafone Idea will hurt both objectives. The company faces an existential crisis since it was hit hardest by the Supreme Court judgment on the AGR issue in 2019, with an estimated liability of Rs 58,000 crore.

    The closure of Vodafone Idea is an arguably greater concern than the fading role of BSNL and MTNL. The government companies are yet to deploy 4G and have become progressively less competitive. Vodafone Idea, on the other hand, still accounts for about a quarter of subscriptions and revenues and can boast of a quality network.

    It has been adjudged the fastest, for three consecutive quarters, by Ookla, a web-service that monitors internet metrics. India can ill-afford to waste such network capacity. The company’s liabilities will deter any potential buyer.

    Vodafone+MTNL+BSNL ?

    A possible way out could be to combine the resources of the MTNL and BSNL and Vodafone Idea through a strategic partnership. Creative government action can save Vodafone Idea as well as improve the competitiveness of BSNL and MTNL.

    It could help secure government dues, investment, and jobs. It is worth recalling here that, about 30 years ago, the Australian government’s conditions for the entry of its first private operator, Optus, required the latter to take over the loss-making government satellite company, Aussat. Similar out-of-the-box thinking may well be key to escape the looming collateral damage.

    It is not trivial to expand competition in India’s telecom market. Especially since there are no major regulatory barriers to entry anymore. Any new private player will be driven largely by commercial considerations. Global experience suggests that well-entrenched incumbents have massive advantages. New players are daunted by the large investments—and much patience!—needed to set up networks, lure existing customers and sign new ones.

    However, regulators and policymakers have other options to expand choice for telecom consumers. Their counterparts in mature regulatory regimes—e.g., in the European Union—have helped develop extensive markets for resale. Recognising the limited influence of smaller players, regulators mandate that the incumbent offer wholesale prices to resellers who then expand choice for end-users.

    This has been virtually impossible in India. There is a near absence of noteworthy virtual network operators (VNOs) and other resellers. A key barrier to resale is India’s licence fee regime which requires licence-holders to share a proportion of their revenues with the government. Thus, resale could hurt exchequer revenues unless resellers are subject to identical levies. Understandably, the levies—and consequently additional reporting and compliance—is a disincentive for smaller players. The disincentive flows from levies based on revenues which comes with considerable costs of compliance. It would almost vanish if the levies were replaced by say, a flat fee computed objectively.

    The ball is in the court of the regulator and the government. They have options. But will they take decisive action to exercise them? It will be ‘tragic’ if they can’t.


  • INTRODUCTION

    Since most of the early scholars, researchers and historians were men, many aspects of society did not find a place in history books. For example, child-birth, menstruation, women’s work, transgenders, households etc. did not find much mention.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    Rather than building a holistic picture of the past, some select aspects such as polity and the different roles of men became the central focus of history writing. Women were confined to one corner of the chapter where a paragraph or two was devoted to the ‘status and position of women’.

    Even the details of these paragraphs were hardly different from each other. This made it look like as if history (and thereby society, polity, economy and all culture) belonged to men while women were only a small static unit to be mentioned separately. Of course, there were some exceptions, but these were however rare. This practice is being corrected now and the roles and presence of women are being read into all parts of historical questions.

    SOURCES FOR UNDERSTANDING GENDER HISTORY

    Sources are the bases of history writing. From simple pre-historic tools to abstruse texts, everything can be utilized to understand life and roles of women in history. The presence as well as the absence of women from sources needs to be duly noticed, deliberated and argued upon and only then to be theorised upon.

    Certain objects being directly related to the lives of women or depicting the ideas of the female principle are of central importance. These include but are not limited to female figurines, art objects, texts attributed to or authored or compiled by women, monuments created by or for women, various objects relating to their lifestyle, objects associated with women on account of their cultural roles and so on.

    It has been rightly pointed out by Uma Chakravarti that much of the gender history written in early phase was a ‘partial view from above’. This referred to the utilization of select textual sources and focused only on relational identity of women. There were, however, a few exceptions.

    GENDER HISTORIOGRAPHY

    Amongst the many narratives propagated to denigrate Indian civilization and culture by the British colonial rulers, the condition of Indian women became a point of central reference. Various social evils that made the life of women miserable were pointed out and efforts were also made to introduce ‘reforms.’ Sati, child-marriages, imposed widowhood, polygamy, dowry, educational and economic inequality, purdah (ghoonghat) and many other practices prevailed during the colonial period that made the life of women difficult and pitiable.

    Some practices affected women of higher social and economic households while others led to misery for poorer women. Many social reform movements were started in the 19th century to address these issues and contributions were made by Indian reformers as well as British officials and other Europeans.

    Women in India came to be treated as a homogeneous category and over generalisation became the norm. While many communities in India practised widow remarriage and did not practise (much less forced) sati and while some practised divorces or separation, the image of the Indian woman who had been subjugated as woman, wife and widow became a dominant theme in history writing.

    Secondly, a western vision was placed over the non-western societies and hence interpretations were far removed from the context. For example, notion of stridhan was equated with dowry and little regard was paid to the provisions regarding its use and ownership by women.

    The huge social stigma that came along with the selling of jewellery of the household (one of the main components of stridhan) was paid no attention to. Similarly, penal provisions listed by ancient texts for misappropriation of women’s property were not even looked into.

    During the Paleolithic age, hunting and gathering was norm. However much importance was given to Hunting than gathering in all literature of history. Studies, however, show that hunted prey formed only 35% of the diet while gathering fruits and other edible material supplied the major portion. Gathering of food resources was ordinarily done by women. Since gathering was an important activity, more than hunting for game, it could point to significant role playing by women.

    The gendered understanding of Harappan civilization is being built upon and various archaeological remains have been studied in this respect. The female figurines, idols of pregnant women, the statue of the ‘dancing girl’, various pieces of jewellery and personal belongings that have been discovered at various sites and offer useful insights on the public and private lives of women and men.

    The statue of a girl obtained from Mohanjodaro has been called a ‘dancing girl’ on grounds of familiarity with the institution of devadasis in the later times. Such backward looking explanations are problematic.

    There is a wide variety of terracotta female figurines that have been found at different sites right from the pre-Harappan times. Women figures are found suckling a baby, holding utensils, kneading dough, nursing infants, carrying objects like drums, seated figures for board games, with steatopygia (fat deposition on the hips and elsewhere), with floral head-dresses and in many other forms.

    Even figurines of pregnant women are quite common. However, most of these have been uncritically associated with fertility, religiosity and reproductive ideas, and have been passed off as representations of the Mother Goddesses. While some of them were votive objects, others are held to be toys or other utilities. The focus on female form has been so stereotypical that women have been seen as associated only with home, hearth, fertility, sexuality and divinity. So much so that sometimes even male figurines in assumed womanly roles were classified as female figurines.

    POSITION OF WOMEN IN EARLY INDIA

    The first literary tradition in the Indian subcontinent (and the oldest in the world) is that of the Vedic corpus. From the four Samhitas to the Upanishads, we find many interesting references to women in various roles. Some of these women have left their mark on the cultural heritage to this day and are remembered in various ritual and social contexts. Their names, stories, some highly revered hymns, and other interesting facets are mentioned in the Vedic corpus.

    The Vedic literature has been classified as Early Vedic and Later Vedic. The Rigvedic society and polity seems to be teeming with life and agro-pastoral economy was enmeshed in close kinship ties. Women as well as men participated in society, economy and polity. Some of the most revered hymns including the gayatri mantra are ascribed to women.

    Various natural phenomena are depicted as Goddesses and they are offered prayers. While quantitative analysis highlights the predominance of Indra, Agni, Varuna and other male gods, the power and stature of the goddesses is equally well established.

    Women participated in all three Vedic socio-political assemblies viz. Sabha, Samiti and Vidhata. They had access to education and were even engaged in knowledge creation. They could choose to be brahmavadinis with or without matrimony.

    Hence, there is no reason to believe that they were only confined to home and hearth. T. S. Rukmani attempts to understand if women had agency in early India. Her work has highlighted many interesting details. The author acknowledges the fact that though the patriarchal set up put women at a loss, there were instances where women found space to exercise their agency.

    She points out that though the texts like the Kalpasutras (Srautasutras, Dharmasutras and Grhasutras) revolved around the ideology of Dharma and there was not much space to express alternative ideas, still these works also find some leeway to express ideas reflecting changed conditions.

    For example, there is a statement in the Apastamba Dharmasutra that one should follow what women say in the funeral samskaras. Stephanie Jamison believes that in hospitality and exchange relations, women played an important role. She says that the approval of the wife was important in the successful completion of the soma sacrifice. In another study it has been shown that women enjoyed agency in deciding what was given in a sacrifice, bhiksha to a sanyasin. The men had no authority in telling her what to do in these circumstances.

    Vedic society was the one which valued marriage immensely. In such contexts, Gender Perspectives if a woman chose not to marry, then it would point to her exercising choice in her decision to go against the grain and remain unmarried.

    Mention may be made of Gargi. She was a composer of hymns and has been called a brahmavadini. This term applies to a woman who was a composer of hymns and chose to remain unmarried, devoting herself to the pursuit of learning.

    Similarly, in the case of Maitreyi, she consciously opts to be educated in the Upanishadic lore and Yajnavalkya does not dissuade her from exercising her choice.

    The statement in the Rigveda that learned daughters should marry learned bridegrooms indicates that women had a say in marriage. Though male offspring is desired, there is a mantra in the Rigveda, recitation of which ensures the birth of a learned daughter.

    Altekar refers to the yajnas like seethayagna, rudrayajna etc. that were to be performed exclusively by women. Some of the women were known for their exceptional calibre, for example, from the Rigveda Samhita we find mention of women like Apala, Ghosha, Lopamudra, Gargi, Maitreyi, Shachi, Vishwavara Atri, Sulabha and others.

    Women have not only been praised as independent individuals but also with reference to their contributions towards their natal or marital families.

    The Later Vedic literature shows the progression towards a State society with a change in the organization of the society and polity. The chief comes to be referred to as bhupati instead of gopati. However, within the twelve important positions (ratnis) mentioned, the chief queen retains a special position under the title mahisi.

    The importance of the chief queen continued as gleaned from several references to them in the Epics, Arthashastra and even in coins and epigraphs from early historical times.

    The other Samhitas also refer to women sages such as Rishikas. The wife is referred to as sahadharmini. Brahmanas or the texts dealing with the performance of the yajna (Vedic ritual), requires a man to be accompanied by his wife to be able to carry out rituals.

    For example, Aitareya Brahmana looks upon the wife as essential to spiritual wholesomeness of the husband. However, there is a mention of some problematic institutions as well.

    Uma Chakravarti has pointed towards the condition of Vedic Dasis (female servant/slave) who are referred to in numerous instances. They were the objects of dana (donation/gift) and dakshina (fee).

    It is generally believed that from the post Vedic period the condition of the women steadily deteriorated. However, Panini’s Ashtadhyayi and subsequent grammatical literature speak highly of women acharyas and Upadhyayas.

    Thus, the memory and practice of a brahmavadini continued even after the Vedic period. The Ramayana, Mahabharata and even the Puranas keep the memory of brhamavadini alive.

    Mention may be made of Anasuya, Kunti, Damyanti, Draupadi, Gandhari, Rukmini who continued to fire the imagination of the poets. Texts show that the daughter of Kuni-garga refused marriage because she did not find anyone worthy of her.

    The Epics also mention women whose opinions were sought in major events. For example, after the thirteen years of exile, while debating upon the future course of action regarding the restoration of their share, the Pandavas along with Krshna asks Draupadi for her views. Similarly, when Krishna goes to the Kaurava’s court to plead the case of Pandavas, Gandhari is called upon to persuade her sons to listen to reason.

    Since a woman taking sanyasa was an act of transgression, one can explore women’s agency through such instances. In the Ramayana, Sabari, who was the disciple of Sage Matanga, and whose hermitage was on the banks of river Pampa was one such sanyasin.

    Such women find mention in Smriti literature and Arthashashtra. Kautilya’s prohibition against initiating women into Sanyasa can make sense only if women were being initiated into sanyasa. He advises the king to employ female parivrajakas as spies.

    Megasthenes mentions women who accompanied their husbands to the forest, probably referring to the Vanaprastha stage. Another category of literature called Shastras that comprises of sutras (aphorisms) and the smriti texts (‘that which is remembered’) becomes important in the postVedic period.

    These textual traditions cover many subjects relating to the four kinds of pursuits of life referred to as purusharthas (namely dharma, karma, kama and moksha). In all these texts we find very liberal values and freedom for both women and men.

    The setting up of a household is seen as an ideal for men as well as women (though asceticism for learning is equally praised for both). For example, Apastambha Sutra opines that rituals carried out by an unmarried man do not please the devatas (divinities). Similarly, Manusmriti provides that ‘for three years shall a girl wait after the onset of her puberty; after that time, she may find for herself a husband of equal status. If a woman who has not been given in marriage finds a husband on her own, she does not incur any sin, and neither does the man she finds’

    Thus, we see that women enjoyed choice in matters of matrimony. It is interesting to note that unmarried daughters were to be provided for by the father. In fact, daughter is stated to be the object of utmost affection. Should a girl lose her parents, her economic interests were well looked after. It was provided that from their shares, ‘the brothers shall give individually to the unmarried girls, one-quarter from the share of each. Those unwilling to give will become outcastes’

    With regards to defining contemporary attitude towards women, Apastambha Sutra prescribed that ‘All must make a way for a woman when she is treading a path.’ Later Dharmashastra also makes similar statements.

    Yagnavalkyasmriti mentions that ‘women are the embodiment of all divine virtues on earth.’ However, there are several provisions that look problematic.

    On one hand, we have reverence assigned to the feminine (divine and worldly) and important roles being played by them, on the other hand we have questionable provisions and descriptions like right to chastise them through beating or discarding.

    The post-Vedic phase from 6th century BCE onwards is also rich in literary traditions with ample depictions of women. Interestingly, we have an entire body of literature that is ascribed totally to women who became Buddhist nuns. These are referred to as Therigathas i.e. the Songs of the Elder Bhikkhunis (Buddhist Women who joined the Sangha).

    The Arthashastra Gender Perspectives gives us information on women who were engaged in economic activities of various kinds. They formed a part of both the skilled and the unskilled workforce. They were into professional as well as non-professional employment.

    Some of their vocations were related to their gender, while the others were not. There were female state employees as well as independent working women. Similarly, some of them were engaged in activities which though not dependent on their biological constitution are nonetheless categorized as women’s domain, e.g. domestic services etc. Some of them were actual state employees, while some others were in contractual relations with the State. For example, we have female bodyguards and spies in the State employment.

    Jaiswal suggests that these women perhaps came from Bhila or Kirata tribe. Female spies were not only to gather information and relay it to proper source, but also to carry out assassinations. However, a closer look at the text shows that there were different classes of female spies engaged for different purposes. Amongst others ‘women skilled in arts were to be employed as spies living inside their houses’. Others were required to work as assassins. Some were to the play the roles of young and beautiful widows to tempt the lust of greedy enemy.

    We also have various Buddhist and Jaina traditions giving us some glimpses of the ideas and institutions of the times. Apart from the orthodox (Vedic and Brahmanic) and heterodox normative tradition we have many popular texts like the Epics in Sanskrit and Jatakas in Pali.

    Even Prakrit language has many interesting narratives and poetic texts. The Therigatha by the Buddhist nuns are an interesting literary source that provides us with a glimpse of various women who attained arhantship or similar other stages of Realisation.

    The deliberation on the age and deterioration of the body by Ambapali, the non-importance of sensual or bodily pleasures by Nanda, Vimla and Shubha etc points towards the intellectual and spiritual engagements and attainments of women.

    It is interesting to note that an absolutely contrary picture is presented by the Jatakas wherein more often than not, women are depicted as evil. It is important to note that women were given an evil aura mostly in their roles as wives or beloveds.

    Both the texts and the archaeological remains have been studied by various scholars and opposing interpretations are not rare. For example, on one side Sita (from Ramayana) and Draupadi (from Mahabharata) have been seen as victims of the patriarchal order; on the other hand, they are also represented as selfwilled women.

    Draupadi after the game of dice presents herself as a forceful and articulate woman. It’s her wit that saves her husbands from becoming slaves of the Kauravas. Her incensed outrage at the attack on her modesty, her bitter lamentations to Krishna, her furious tirade against Yudhishthira for his seeming inability to defend her honour and many more such instances show her to be an aggressive woman. This persona is juxtaposed to her representations as an ideal wife elsewhere. However, Draupadi is never idealised as a perfect wife who endures the most severe trials without complaint. This honour is reserved for Sita in the Ramayana. She is also presented as a victim like Draupadi and voices her concern at her fate openly. However, her aggression is directed inwards as indicated by her action against the self which culminate in her union with the mother Earth.

    Are the limited number of hymns ascribed to the Vedic women a signifier of their general status? Are the goddesses merely representational with no connection to the ideas and behaviour towards women? Did only princesses choose their spouses? Are the warrior women an exception? Such searching questions need to be addressed with due diligence.

    While women studies are a good development there is a need to expand the horizons to include other varieties of human existence. We have narratives of fluid sexuality in various texts. The one year of Arjuna’s life spent as Brihallana and rebirth of Amba as Shikhandi are some interesting instances. The artefacts found at the site of Sheri Khan Tarakai include visibly hermaphroditic figurines. There is a need to understand the notions of the feminine, masculine, neuter, and other forms of gender and sexual identities. These will have ramifications for understanding the ideas of conjugality, family, community, society and even polity and spirituality.

    CONCLUSION

    Human civilisations were built by men as well as women, however, history writing has a huge male-bias. Women were confined to questions of status and position that were largely evaluated in terms of their roles in the domestic sphere.

    Their treatment as wives and widows became a central focus of most research alongside their place in ritual or religious context. This made them peripheral to mainstream history. This was questioned by various scholars from time to time and led to the development of gendered understanding of history. Focusing attention on women’s history helps to rectify the method which sees women as a monolithic homogeneous category. Writing gender history has helped in building an image of the past that is wholesome and nuanced.