Mapping of Coral Reef:-

Background:-

PROVe, The Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV), developed by National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), maps the coral reefs in Andaman & Nicobar Island.

Details:-

Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India are the hot-spots of biodiversity with their unique Coral Reef bio-reserve. In recent decades, they have been under constant threat due to global warming and sea level rise. Coral reef biodiversity at Andaman region, roughly around 11,000 sq.km., was seriously affected during the 2004 Tsunami event and also are undergoing the stress from the increasing sea surface temperature.

Currently, there is no mechanism other than Scuba diving to examine the corals and assess the extent of damage or rejuvenation that might be taking place since the great damages happened earlier. National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), for the first time, used the indigenously-developed Remotely Operated Vehicle (PROVe), to map the coral reefs in Andaman & Nicobar Islands (North Bay and Chidiyatapu) and that the ROV can be used for this purpose efficiently.

The ROV can effectively map 4-6 sq.km. of coral reefs in a day, whereas the same job takes about a week for a Scuba diver. The images of corals recorded by the ROV are useful to study the biodiversity of coral reefs and their evolution. The underwater visuals have shown the coral debris and boulders caused by the 2004 Tsunami, at the same time, also capturing some locations where the rejuvenation of the colonies of branching corals, stony coral, brain corals was observed. The water temperature ranged between 31oC at surface and 30.5oC at 1 m water depth. It further decreases in deeper waters as recorded by the ROV based sensor.

The radiometer attached on the ROV provided the spectral signatures of different types of corals in Andaman. The spectral signatures of the corals are valuable in developing algorithms to map the coral reefs using sensing techniques, especially the satellite remote sensing. A good news is that there are no evidences of coral bleaching at Andaman reef during the mapping period in April 2016 but will require constant monitoring to know what would happen when the temperature raises further.

Coral Reef:-

Corals are minute invertebrates, yet they can build vast reefs such as the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, which is the largest natural structure in the ocean. How is a coral reef formed?

Reef building begins in a very simple way. The coral larva settling on a hard substratum begins to grow into one colony by repeated budding. This colony continues to grow vertically towards the sea surface and laterally as far as they can.

Besides corals, several other organisms in the reef, notably the mollusks and some algae, called calcareous algae, also construct calcium skeletons. When these organisms die, the calcium first dissolves and then re-solidifies to form a rock, on which new corals come and settle. Thus between every birth and death scenario, the reef continues to grow. On an average a reef grows by 1 mm per year.

What is the difference between coral growth and reef growth ?

A coral may grow 1 cm or even 10 cm in a year but that does not fill up the space between the corals or even the space between the branches of a coral. A reef, on the other hand, is a solid wall with all spaces totally filled up with calcareous material. It is the cementing process that takes time – that is why the reef grows much slower than the corals.

Are all reefs the same?

No. To answer this question we should first see how the reefs are formed: at the beginning, the corals settle and grow near the coastline, often growing almost up to the edge of the shore (high water level). At this stage they are called fringing reefs because they border on the land.

As the corals can now grow only seaward, they start propagating in that direction. In the process, they create a gap between the shoreline and reef. This space, generally with less number of coral colonies, becomes the lagoon. At this stage of its evolution, the reef is called a barrier reef. 

If the corals happen to be growing around an island and if the island happened to sink below the sea surface, then the reef structure would resemble a ring around the non-existing island. The place once occupied by the island becomes the lagoon and the reef is then called an atoll

So, all these types occur near the continents?

Yes, except atolls. They occur in mid-oceans, as in Lakshadweep, or on continental shelves at several hundred meters depth. Quite often, these atolls grow on top of extinct volcanoes.

Then how do islands form on atolls?

When corals die or break, their skeleton is broken down gradually to fine sand particles. The winds and wave action then move them to one side of the atoll where they accumulate. When the top of this sand bank is at level with the sea surface, vegetation like coconut settles there and grows. The vegetation binds more sand and this gradually leads to the formation of islands

Are there other types of reefs?

Yes, but they are less important and not widespread in distribution.

  • A patch reef refers to a small patch of colonies, smaller in size than a fringing reef.
  • A table reef looks like a table of coral colonies placed on the sea floor.
  • A ridge reef, as the name implies, is a long ridge of corals.
  • A micro- atoll is an atoll-like reef structure within a major atoll.

What are the reef types found in India?

The fringing reefs and the atolls.

Fringing reefs are common. They occur around the islands in the Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of Kachchh, Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

The reefs in the Lakshadweep group of islands are oceanic atolls.

Barrier reefs are not known form Indian seas though there was a record of such a reef off Andamans in the 1920s. This has never been reconfirmed.

Are there coral reefs on the central east and west coasts of India?

No. The conditions here, especially salinity and high sediment load, are not ideal for coral growth. Most major rivers of India, like the Ganges, flow into the sea on the east coast, bringing in lots of sediments that would not allow the corals to grow. On the west coast, the monsoon is intense from June to August. The fresh water flow into the sea at this time reduces salinity to less than half of the normal and the sea water becomes murky brownish with the sediments.

Was it always like this?

No. There were coral reefs along the west coast some 18,000 years ago. These reefs got drowned (sank below the lighted layers) when the sea level started rising fast during the last glacial ice melt.

Some reefs later started growing near the coast but the change of climate to monsoon style some 6000 years ago killed them also.

Not all of them are lost, however. Some die-hard stragglers have managed to reach the shore and grow there. We can see them as isolated patches on the coast. They do not, however, form reef structures and will not be able to do so in the near future.

Are there other ways in which reefs can get killed?

In the course of natural geological events, a reef may sometimes get lifted above the sea surface.

The earth’s surface is not one single plate but is made up of number of plates that fit together. These plates constantly push against each other and if one plate near the coast overrides another, then the reef on it gets raised above sea surface and dies.

There are two such raised reefs in India – one in Ramanathapuram in Tamil Nadu and another in Okhamandal in Gujarat. Both these reefs were raised and died some 5000 years ago.

Is there anything special about present day Indian reefs?

Yes, specifically with those of the Gulf of Kachchh.

The reefs here are the most northern in India. The temperature variations here are high, from 15 to 30°C. The salinity goes above normal seawater salinity for several months. The area experiences high tidal amplitude, which leave corals exposed for several hours at times. The strong tidal currents also stir up inorganic sediments.

In spite of these adverse conditions, corals still thrive in the Kachchh region. The biodiversity of the corals, and that of the reefs as a whole, however, is much less than in other reefs.

What has this biodiversity got to do with coral reefs?

You know that diversity means variety. Biodiversity means the variety of animals and plants that live together at one place or in an ecosystem. The higher the biodiversity, the more mature and stable an ecosystem is and higher its biological productivity is.

Coral reefs have the greatest biodiversity of all marine ecosystems. In a typical reef you’ll find corals, snails, clams, sponges, anemones, crabs, worms, starfish, shrimps, lobsters, sea cucumbers, sea lilies, fish such as groupers, snappers, breams, surgeonfish, damselfish, butterflyfish, parrotfish, clownfish and a number of other highly coloured ornamental fish, sharks, turtles, dolphins, green algae, brown algae, red algae, sea grasses and dozens of other animal and plant groups that you’ve not even heard of. And all of them represented by dozens of species!

Sounds great! So I can see all of them when I go to the reef.

No, you won’t. Not in one visit, not even in several. You need to go to a reef many times before you can see even half of them. Still better if you can dive, since some animals like soft corals live only below 5 m depth. You also need some experience in recognizing them for what they are.

Well, you can at least tell me what can I expect to see in the reef the first time.

Let us begin with corals. If you are on the shore, of course, you will see only sand. But if you swim out into the lagoon or take a small boat you’ll begin to see clumps and bushes of stag horn corals. Between them you may find some massive corals. The closer you go near the reef; the corals will become abundant and more varied. You may also see the mushroom corals at times. On the reef flat, you may not find much except few flower corals and creeping ones; outside the reef, on the seaward slope, the coral abundance will again become high. If you are a good snorkeler or a scuba diver you could go further down and experience the wonder of corals even more.

What else would I see?

Snails and clams. Have you seen the cowrie shells sold as souvenirs in many curio shops? Well, down there you can see them live, glossy and brightly coloured. You can also see large ones like strombus or trochus shells often.

There is one clam that is particularly interesting. It is the giant clam Tridacna. This clam does not move but gets embedded between rocks, cements itself there and grows. It is the largest clam known and individuals of half a meter length are common in our reefs. The biggest ones, such as those from Pacific atolls, can even weigh up to half a ton. This clam, like the corals, also harbours zooxanthellae.

Be careful when you go near them, don’t put your finger or toe between their valves. The muscles that close the shells are so powerful that your fingers can be snapped off like matchsticks.

Some snails like limpets have no shells. These are brightly coloured and look attractive on the coral rocks. You can also see octopus darting in between the corals..

Can I see lots of fish also?

Yes, that is what attracts most people to the reefs. The variety in number, size and shape is almost endless. Not all of them are so common. The butterfly fish are the most abundant, you are almost certain to see them in the first dip in the water.

If you float silently near large coral blocks, you’ll also see a number of other brightly coloured fish. And if you see an anemone you are certain to see the yellow and red clown fish darting between its tentacles.

The polka-dotted moray eel is also a common sight. It hides in crevices and only its head comes out in search of food. Be careful with your fingers – the teeth of the moray eels are razor-sharp.

If you are wading in shallow water or reef-walking, then it would be a sensible idea to wear thick canvas shoes. You may step on a sting ray, a scorpion fish or a stone fish and end up with pain and swelling for several days.

Is there any other animal I might enjoy looking at?

The dolphins. You can see them quite often frolicking near the reefs.

Are all these animals and plants the same in all our reefs?

Not necessarily. Some reef areas have their own unique species. If you go to Andamans you’ll see the salt-water crocodile near the reefs. You can also see the giant sea anemone here, which is at least half a meter across. You don’t see them in atolls.

One more question. Are there any dangerous animals in a reef?

No, not the ones that cause fatal harm. Contact with some corals can cause skin allergies and irritation. Sting by some fish can be painful for some days. Even scratching your unprotected legs or arms against corals can cause cuts and sores but not death.

There is one animal you should be vigilant against. It is the box jellyfish. Its sting is fatal. Fortunately we don’t see it near our reefs. It is more common in Pacific reefs but who knows, you may one day go to see those reefs also. You should, because each reef you visit can be a new wonderful experience.

Let us talk about what coral reefs can give us. Tell me something about that.

 

Reefs abound with food fish. Most of them live in the lagoon. Some fish like tuna and sharks live outside the reef but come closer to the reef to feed on the small fish. The biological productivity of the reefs is very high. We can get from a unit reef area as much fish as from rich fishing grounds like the Peruvian upwelling known for record anchovy catches.

But I don’t see any major fishing units near the reef.

Fortunately, it is not easy to catch all reef fish as we do elsewhere with trawlers and seiners. The nature of the rocky bottom, presence of corals that can tear away the nets and the abrupt variations in depth, guarantee that no fishing net of mass catches can be used in a reef. Most of the fish can be caught only with lines or traps. Often what can be caught this way is more than enough for local needs.

What about the small colourful fish? We can’t eat them, of course.

No, but we can sell them to aquarium hobbyists. The ornamental fish from reefs are far more colourful and diverse than those from freshwaters. The demand for these fish worldwide is so great that it is a lucrative industry in several third world countries. The Philippines is known to export every year aquarium fish worth several million dollars from her reefs.

What else is edible?

The sea weeds, if you have a liking for them! In India, we don’t eat them but some of these weeds are used for producing jellies, agar and cosmetics. There is a good potential for collecting seaweeds from the reef or even cultivating them in the lagoon. In some reef areas the local people relish the Octopus and the giant clam.

What other useful things has the reef to offer us?

The corals themselves, of course. In most of the villages bordering coral reefs, houses are built only with coral stones and mortar from coral debris. Even whitewashing is done with coral lime paste. At an industrial level, the coral sand rich in calcium is a potential raw material for the cement industry.

Most often corals, particularly the branching ones, are also collected and sold as souvenirs. Curio shops near the reefs have stocks of them though it is forbidden.

I have also seen shells being sold.

Yes. The cowrie shells are the most popular though a large variety of other shells are also sold. Some shells are collected for industrial purposes.

Do you know that, before the advent of plastics, even shirt buttons were made from the trochus shells?

Some large shells are cut and polished and sold as ornaments and bangles, ear-rings, studs, necklaces, pendants, finger-rings etc. This is again a large industry in the Indo-Pacific reefs, generating several million dollars worth of business every year.

I read sometime back that corals can also be used as transplants. Is that correct?

Yes. A substance for use as bone transplant should have nearly the same chemical composition as the bone, should be tough to give mechanical strength and at the same time porous enough to allow fine blood vessels to pass through. Among the several bio-materials, corals like the massive Goniopora are the best choice. Either we can cut a bone-shaped structure from the coral and use it as a transplant or better still, convert the skeletal material to hydroxyapatite, which is the mineral component of the bone. This forms a bond directly with the bone and hence can be used as a bone-replacing material; on implantation, this promotes new bone growth. Coral skeletons also find use in dental applications, as materials to fill in cavities.

Can we get medicines from corals?

Not from hard corals, though some Ayurvedic preparations may include them. Most other organisms like soft corals, sponges, bryozoans, sea slugs, pufferfish secrete compounds that are bio-active. It is like this. In a coral reef space is at a premium. Every organism tends to protect its space and when others encroach, it secretes some compounds to repulse them. These are basically antibiotics but may prove useful drugs for some human ailments. The possibility of discovering novel products from these organisms has generated considerable interest worldwide. In India, NIO is doing research in this area for the last two decades. Some products extracted from sponges and soft corals have shown anti-viral properties.

What else can we get from reefs?

Protection to our coasts. The reefs are natural walls that stop the strong waves and storm surges from reaching the shores. That is how the lagoon is calm even when the sea outside the reef is rough. This prevents shore erosion. This type of protection is critical to the islands. Most of our coral islands are small and low-lying. Even little erosion can affect them dramatically.

Impressive! Can you put all these together and tell me what is the worth of a reef in hard currency?

Difficult to say because the extent of uses varies from reef to reef. Besides, the economic value of an activity is determined by cultural beliefs and traditions. For example, the entire population in Lakshadweep practise Islam which forbids them eating crustaceans. So lobster-fishing, which elsewhere is a lucrative industry, is non-existent here.

On an average, the total economic value, in terms of extractive uses, is about US $2750 per hectare reef area per year. Globally, all the reefs together (62 million hectares) have therefore a resource use value of about US $170 billion  per year. This is only a potential estimate since not all reefs are accessible at present.

Indian reefs cover an estimated area of about one lakh hectares. However, it is unlikely that more than 10% of them are used at present. Even at this level, the economic value of our reefs could be about US $30 million (about 120 crore Indian rupees). But this is only half the story.

This is very interesting. Tell me what is the other half?

Tourism. What the reefs can offer you by way of aesthetics, recreation, and adventure cannot be matched by any other ecosystem, except perhaps tropical rain forests. Tourism to coral reefs is a massive industry worldwide involving transporters, hoteliers, boat crew, diving gear operators, guides and a host of other auxiliary services. The current estimate of the economic value of coral reefs from this source alone is as much as that from other uses, and together can take the total economic value of coral reefs to more than 350 billion US $ a year. If the present trend is any indication, it is ever- increasing.

The coral reefs must pay for being so rich, do they?

Yes, they do. But not all damages are man-made. Some are natural and at least one cause was natural in the beginning but got aggravated by human activities later.

What is the natural threat that has been aggravated by human activities?

Predation by the crown- This is an interesting story.

The starfish is normally present in the reefs in very low numbers. The triton snail feeds on the young ones of the starfish and thus keeps the population of the starfish in check. But when we started harvesting triton shells in commercial quantities, there were not enough snails left to feed on the young starfish. The latter started growing in proliferation and their feeding on corals increased dramatically.

That was how many reefs got totally devastated by the starfish outbreak.

This is an example of how unregulated human activities can aggravate natural damages, even indirectly.

Was there any other natural event that caused as much damage?

Yes, the unusual summer warming of the year 1998. Even in tropical seas, temperature changes follow a seasonal cycle, with increase in summer. Sometimes corals react to this increase in temperature by expelling their zooxanthellae. As a consequence the corals lose their colour and look white. This is called bleaching.

Bleaching is a common phenomenon in most coral reefs in summer but never reaches a severe degree. The bleached corals usually recover their colour once the temperature comes back to normal. The temperature increase in these instances is generally less than 1 degree and lasts for only a few days or may be a week or two.

During the1998 summer, however, a vast layer of warm surface waters spread over the whole tropical region. As a result, the temperature increased by 2 degrees higher than the seasonal maximum and persisted for several weeks. This was too much for corals. Most of them, in particular the branching corals which are more sensitive, got bleached and died, eventually leaving vast stretches of the reefs barren..

More than 40 countries reported impacts varying from moderate to severe. In India, Andaman and Nicobar reefs were the most severely affected (up to 80% death of corals) followed by Lakshadweep (40%-80%) and Gulf of Mannar (60%) reefs.

What other natural causes affect corals?

Exposure. Corals living in the intertidal zones get periodically exposed to atmosphere. This lasts generally 1-2 hours and all the coral species can withstand this exposure. But in regions of high tidal amplitude, as in the Gulf of Kachchh, this exposure can last several hours. If this also happens to coincide with sunny weather, then it can kill corals. Fortunately, this does not happen often.

Do corals also must breakdown at one time or other?

Yes, they do. A coral colony is home to many animals and plants but some of them are not that grateful! The mollusks, worms and sponges are notorious – they bore into the coral skeleton to make their homes there. In the process they weaken the skeleton and make it susceptible to mechanical breakdown by wave action.

So, waves also affect corals.

Yes, continuous pounding by waves on the fore reef and reef flat kills many corals there. That is why you find lots of rubble and less of live corals there. But if the wave action is very strong, as during hurricanes, corals even several meters below can also be broken to pieces or uprooted by the waves. Hurricane damages are common with Pacific reefs but rare in Indian reefs.

Well, these are known threats. Are there potential threats?

Yes, one such is the sea level rise. You may remember that we said entire reefs got drowned in the past because of a rise in sea level. But this happened over many centuries.

In the present century, this is happening in decades. We are burning so much of coal and oil that the carbon di-oxide concentration in the atmosphere is increasing rapidly. This causes the earth to warm up which in turn causes polar ice caps to melt. This makes the sea level to rise at a rate higher than the reef growth. If this continues then the coral reefs will be drown.

But I read that the sea level is not rising as much as we thought earlier, is that right?

Nobody knows for certain. It is possible that the rate of sea level rise is reduced now but it does not seem to have reversed. There are different possible scenarios, from low to high rates of rise.

The atolls will be the most affected; even if they grow faster, they may not be able to cope up with projected sea level rise in the next century. The fringing and barrier reefs may fare better, keeping up with the sea level rise up to mid-range projection. In any case, the threat is real but its magnitude is difficult to gauge now.

Will this have serious fall-outs?

In the case of mainland, the protection offered to the coasts by the reefs would be lost. There will be increased erosion and land loss. In the case of islands like those of the Lakshadweep, the situation will be still worse. These low-lying islands, hardly a meter or two above sea surface now, can get drowned completely.

But are there man-made effects that have immediate impacts?

Yes, the most important among them is coral mining. Very often, corals are removed and used to build houses and produce lime. For most of the coastal villagers, this comes free from the sea and they have no qualms in taking away as much as possible. Unfortunately, they make no distinction between dead and live corals.

As a result, several large patches of low-lying reefs are totally lost. This impact is most serious in the Gulf of Mannar reefs, especially near the coastal villages and towns like Mandapam and Tuticorin.

But these are only local impacts and people do need some coral stones, don’t they?

Well, if the removal is only moderate and restricted only to dead corals, like coral debris, then perhaps the impacts could be minimized. But most often, people do not make any distinction between dead and live corals, nor do they respect any limit for extraction. And if the extraction is on an industrial scale, then it could be catastrophic.

Did you know that the extraction of coral sands in Gulf of Kachchh was leased out to a cement company in the eighties? Every year about a million tonnes of coralline material, including live corals, were dredged out, killing a large portion of the reefs in the process. Fortunately better sense prevailed and this lease was not renewed. But then the damage was already done the loss of coral cover was in excess of 50% at most of the reefs in the leased area.

But can’t we allow some corals to be collected as souvenirs? I’d like to take a coral home.

That is precisely the problem. If each one of us want a coral like that, we would then need one billion corals. Not even all the world reefs put together can satisfy this need!

And again, we all want the beautiful branching corals.

That means the removal is selective, affecting the biodiversity. Some fish which live only with the branching corals will also disappear and the very beauty of the reef will be lessened. What do you prefer – looking at the colourful corals in all their splendour in the reefs or their bleached skeletons in the showcases?

Okay, I get your point. But don’t tell me I can’t even catch some fish to eat!

You can, as long as you use a line or a trap or a harpoon. If you resort to other methods, then it is a different story

How?

Some methods used for fishing in reefs are highly destructive.

In one such method the fishermen dive to the reef floor and release a poison. The fish in the surrounding area get narcotized and float to the surface where they are collected. What is not seen is the death of all other organisms near the site where the poison is released.

In a similar way, some fishermen use dynamites underwater. The fish get stunned with the shock waves and float to the surface. The damage in this case is much more intensive. All corals in the vicinity of the blast are smashed to bits. In both these methods of destructive fishing, damages are not visible to the casual observer and often the impact goes unnoticed until it is too late.

Are such methods practiced in India?

Fortunately, no. The fish poison (generally called Rotenone) or the dynamite material is not easily available to ordinary fishermen. Some fishermen, however, use poisons extracted from locally available plants and animals.

But I am sure some forms of fishing practiced in India that is more destructive than productive, is it not?

Yes, it is the practice of collection of live baits and the ornamental fish. The live-bait fish are used in pole and line tuna fishing. The ornamental fish are collected for sales. Both these groups of fish usually live between the coral branches or around the coral colonies.

The fishermen encircle large patches of corals with fine mesh cloth or net and hit on the corals to chase the fish out. In the process of collecting these fish worth a few hundred rupees, colonies of corals growing for several years are killed.

Are there unintentional damages associated with fishing?

Yes, the most common and the most serious one is that made by anchors.

Most of the fishermen, when they go for reef fishing, anchor their boats in the shallow parts of the reefs. Quite often the anchor falls on the corals and if the boat drifts, then the anchor and the chain get dragged over the corals, breaking the branches or even uprooting entire colonies. In the case of large ships that anchor near the reefs for passenger and cargo traffic, the damage can be enormous. Imagine what would happen if a 20 to 30 ton giant broom sweeps the reef?

What other human activities affect corals?

Pollution. Corals are very sensitive to oil and metal pollution. If a reef happens to be near the effluent discharge point of any industry or near a harbour, then the reef is practically doomed.

Even seemingly unrelated onshore activities can kill corals. For example:

  • Logging is a major land-based industry in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. As a result, huge quantities of mud and silt are washed off every monsoon on to the coastal zones. These settle on corals and kill them by smothering.
  • In the Gulf of Kachchh lots of mangroves have been cut. The mangroves have a mud – binding capacity. When the mangroves are cut, the mud-binding capacity is lost and the mud gets washed on to corals. This is a major cause of death of nearshore corals in this region
  • Thermal pollution, like hot water discharge from the cooling towers of industries or power plants near the reefs, can also kill them

Does atomic radiation affect corals? I remember that some reefs in the Pacific were used as nuclear bomb test sites by USA and France.

We don’t know for certain about radiation effects because these sites are not accessible to civilian scientists. Undoubtedly, the shock waves of nuclear explosion must have killed corals. How much? Nobody would tell us that or let us find out.

The corals must be living a miserable life, aren’t they?

From every angle, yes.

Even when you pay a visit to them you make their life miserable! The hotels meant to provide lodging for you may be built of coral stones, or may even be built on the reefs so that you don’t have to go too far to see them! With the tourism industry, comes the pollution – sewage, oil, plastics and other solid wastes.

Even your reef walking can be harmful to corals; you may inadvertently step on them and break off their branches.

When I first saw a coral, I thought that it was a plant. Is that right ?

I am not surprised. Most first-time visitors to a reef tend to think of the corals as plants because they remain fixed to rocks, are colourful to look at, and many of the branched ones resemble small trees. In reality, a coral is a simple animal like the sea anemone we find on rocky beaches. Unlike the anemone, the coral animal is generally small and constructs a skeleton around its body for protection. A coral animal is also called a polyp.

Are polyp and coral the same?

No. The term coral is usually denotes the skeleton though at times the polyp is also called coral animal

What does a polyp look like?

Each polyp is a hollow cylinder of tissues with tentacles and a central mouth opening at the top. In a coral colony, a thin layer of tissue joins the adjacent polyps to each other. The central part of the cylinder has filaments called mesenteries. They serve like the stomach to absorb the food and also have gonads that produce male and female gametes (reproductive cells).

The size of the polyp ranges from about 0.5 mm to 20 mm in diameter, though there are exceptions. The size of the polyp ranges from about 0.5 mm to 20 mm in diameter, though there are exceptions.

How does the polyp make its skeleton?

The external surface of the polyp has some special cells called calicoblasts that can take dissolved calcium from seawater and construct a solid skeleton. The skeleton thus looks like a cup with side walls, a bottom and open at the top.

If the polyp is so small, then how come some corals look so big?

What you look at and think is a coral is not one coral but a number of them growing together. If you look at a coral piece closely you will find a lot of pores on it. Each one was the place where one individual polyp lived. Every coral colony begins as a minute skeleton of one single polyp and then keeps on growing by adding more and more individuals.

If all coral colonies start from a single polyp, then how come there are so many varieties?

Genetic diversity comes to play its role here. You know the tiger, the cat and the lion all belong to the same genus, yet are so different. Similarly, the shape and size of a coral colony is genetically determined. The forms that we commonly see are:-

– massive (stone-like),
– foliaceous (leaf-like),
– branching (tree-like or flower like), and
– encrusting (coating-like).

At times, water depth and light may also control the shape. At greater depths, the pressure is high and the coral skeleton tends to grow more flatter. The growth forms also change because the corals are continuously on the look-out for light.

How does sunlight affect the growth of a coral?

Here we come to an interesting aspect of coral life. All corals that we see on a reef have microscopic plants (called Zooxanthellae) living inside their cells. These algae have chlorophyll pigments and produce organic matter by photosynthesis. For this, they need light. So the coral has to remain near the surface where the sunlight is abundant.

The colour of the corals, in fact, comes from the algal pigments. If the algae were not there, then the coral tissue would be a transparent layer through which we could even see the skeleton

How has the coral acquired the algae and why should it tolerate them?

Nobody knows how the algae came to live inside the animal cells. In fact, these algae are also found in some clams and worms. When the algae live with the animals, both are benefited.

The algae produce organic matter by photosynthesis but do not use all of it. Some portion of this is passed on to corals for their nourishment. The corals, like all animals, excrete nitrogen and phosphorous salts and carbon -di-oxide. All these are needed for photosynthesis by algae and are readily taken up by them.

The presence of zooxanthellae also enhances coral growth. When they photosynthesize, they remove carbon- di-oxide. This reduces the acidic conditions at the sites where calcium is deposited by the corals. This in turn retards calcium dissolution, thus enhancing precipitation of calcium and coral skeletal growth. The mode of living together by two organisms with mutual benefit like this is called symbiosis.

Interesting. Then corals do not need any other food, is that right?

No, not totally. What they can get from their algae cannot satisfy all their needs. In fact, corals are basically carnivorous. They catch tiny animals from seawater and swallow them. That is their main food. What they get from the algae is only supplementary.

Some corals can also feed on detritus (dead organic matter) and some others can take up dissolved organic matter directly from seawater. Corals are thus versatile in their feeding habits. This is what helps them to survive and thrive in oceanic deserts.

So corals will have to move in search of food?

No. As their skeleton remains fixed to the rocky bases in the reef or the lagoon, the corals cannot move. Instead the food comes to them, along with the water currents.

Corals feed on tiny microscopic animals called plankton. These animals drift along with currents and when they pass close by, the corals catch them with their tentacles, sting them with their stinging cells, paralyze them by injecting venom and swallow them.

All corals are nocturnal; they become active feeders at night, when the plankton animals come to the surface layer from deep waters to where they go during daytime. If you dive in a reef at night, you will be surprised to see how active the corals are – a totally contrasting picture from the daytime when they are withdrawn into their skeletal cavities.

What are these stinging cells?

All corals have cells called nematocysts in their tentacles and near the mouth. These nematocysts have a central space filled with a venomous substance, a long coil through which the venom can flow and barbs on the coil to hold the prey tight. The stinging cells come in at least 20 varieties – small, big, long, short but all have only one function.

Don’t the corals move even for short distances?

Not the ones that are colonial and remain cemented to the bottom. Only one coral, the mushroom coral, can move for short distances. Incidentally, mushroom corals are single polyps that can grow up to 30 or 40 cm and lead a solitary life. In colonial corals, the polyps rarely exceed a cm in diameter.

Are there other solitary corals?

Yes, some deep-water corals are solitary. If you recall, we said that corals need light and hence they remain near the surface of the sea. These corals, having zooxanthellae, are also called hermatypic corals. They can be seen only in tropical and subtropical seas. These are the ones that form the coral reefs.

Some other corals, called ahermatypes, do not have zooxanthellae. Therefore they do not need light and can live in deep waters upto depths of 1000 or 2000 meters. These corals generally lead a solitary life and if they happen to form colonies, they are usually small with only a few individuals. The ahermatypic corals also occur in all latitudes.

Does temperature promote the development of coral reefs?

Yes. The reef building corals require warm temperatures for their survival. They grow well at temperatures greater than 20°C and can thrive even at 35°C as in the Red Sea, Persian Gulf or our Gulf of Kachchh.

Some of them occur sometimes at low temperatures, even down to 10°C, but they do not form reefs. It is because of this preference for warm waters, that the greatest number of corals is found in the tropical belt, with a decrease towards the subtropical seas.

Are there other conditions that effect coral growth?

Yes. Several but at least 3 of them are important:

(a) Firm substratum to settle

Corals need natural surfaces like rocks, coral stones or even molluscan shells to settle and grow. We rarely find profuse coral settlement on man-made structures like jetties or tetrapods though metallic structures like hulls of sunken boats and ships favour coral settlements.

(b) Salinity

Seawater contains 35 g of dissolved salts per liter whereas freshwater has only a few mg of dissolved salts. This saltiness is called salinity. Corals need this salinity to grow well. At times, corals can withstand some decrease in salinity (perhaps down to 30 g of salts per liter) for sometime (a few weeks to one or two months) but not more than that.

(c) Water clarity

When the waters are turbid, inorganic particles keep on falling on corals, but the corals cannot escape from this particle rain by moving away or by closing the skeleton. If the particle rain is less intense, corals can still clean themselves by ciliary movements but at high turbid conditions, the cleaning mechanism cannot cope and the corals eventually die of smothering.

The sedimentation also has an indirect effect – it reduces light penetration in the sea, thus reducing photosynthesis by zooxanthellae and the coral growth. This does not, however, kill the corals.

You said that a polyp grows into a colony by adding individuals. How does this happen?

This happens by budding, which is an asexual method of reproduction. In this case, the first polyp buds off a second one, which buds off another one and so on. The colony thus keeps growing. Budding can be either intratentacular or extratentacular, depending on the coral species: in the former, the offspring is first produced by division of a polyp within its own skeleton and then separated from the mother polyp by a skeletal wall. In the latter, the mother polyp produces a bud outside its skeleton. This bud later secrets it’s own skeleton.

Do the corals reproduce sexually also, like other animals? Are there mating rituals?

Yes, they do. Each polyp is a hermaphrodite and can produce both male and female gametes. At certain phases of the moon, the corals release synchronously the male and female gametes into the surrounding seawater. Though there are no sexual manifestations beforehand, this comes as close to as being called a mating ritual. The gametes unite and produce a larva called planula. This swims around for a few days, looking for a hard substratum to settle. Once settled, this starts reproduction by budding to form a new coral colony.

How long corals live?

It is a difficult question to answer. When the polyps reproduce by asexual means, the growth can be endless. Some large coral colonies have been known to be as old as 100-200 years.

How fast the corals grow?

Very slowly! The massive ones like the brain corals (the ones that resemble, in form, the human brain) grow no more than a cm per year. This is because the calcium carbonate deposition is a slow process and the growth occurs in all directions. The branching corals are relatively fast- growing. Some of them can grow as much as 18 to 20 cm per year but their skeletons are less dense than those of the massive ones.

You mentioned that some coral colonies could be more than 100 years old. If the growth of corals is so slow then how can you make out their age?

The growth of a coral is not uniform throughout the year. At certain times, when warm conditions with abundant sunlight prevail, coral grows fast. At other times, when there is heavy rain during monsoon, its growth slows down. When a coral grows fast, it deposits more calcium into the skeleton, which becomes dense. When the growth is slow, calcium deposition becomes lighter. If we x-ray a coral skeleton, these regions would appear as dark and light bands. Since seasonal changes, such as those between warm and rainy months occur generally once in a year, a dark and light band together would correspond to one year’s growth. If we take a portion of a coral colony and count the number of dark or light bands, then we will know its age.

What else can the bands tell us, apart from age?

While the corals deposit calcium, they also include with it a variety of materials, like metals, humic acids and some natural elements like carbon and oxygen. Among these, humic acids come from land sources and are brought into the coastal waters by river flow. So, the more the rainfall, the more humic acids come with the river flow, the more their abundance in the coral skeleton. When we look at a coral skeleton under ultra-violet light, we can see the presence of humic acids as fluorescent bands. The intensity of fluorescence thus is an index of rainfall. Knowing the age from the growth band at the location of the fluorescent band, we can deduce whether the monsoon was strong or weak – at that time.

Interesting. Do these bands tell us anything more?

Yes. You know, most elements have isotopes i.e. atoms that are slightly different from the most common ones. Oxygen has two isotopes: a lighter one (016 ) which is common and a heavier one (018 ). At higher temperatures the lighter isotopes escape from the seawater leaving the heavier ones behind. So if we find heavier isotopes of oxygen in a coral skeleton at a particular growth band, then we can conclude that the sea temperature was higher in that year. If we know how much more of heavier isotopes were there, then we can even deduce how much higher the temperature was.

Corals can thus act as indicators of past climate changes.

Are there natural enemies to corals?

Yes, some fish, in particular the parrotfish, feed on corals. These have powerful teeth with which they can snip off pieces of coral skeleton along with the polyp tissues and ingest them. The butterfly fish also feed on corals but since their teeth are not as strong, they just nibble the corals. There is one more predator that is more dangerous to corals. It is the crown-of-thorns starfish. It exclusively feeds on corals. Unlike the fish which bite or nibble parts of the corals, this starfish envelops the whole coral with its arms and sucks out all of the coral tissue, leaving only the bare skeleton.

Do corals suffer from diseases?

Yes. At least two diseases are known so far to affect corals. The first is the black band disease, which is widely prevalent. The cause for this is infection with a bacterium. Coral tissues affected by this disease become blackish and look like a dark band among healthy tissues. The less prevalent white band disease causes the affected tissues to look like a white band around the lesion. The organism responsible for this disease is not known at present. Recently NIO scientists recorded another disease, the pink line disease, from some corals in Lakshadweep. Though the cause for this is also not known, it is suspected that the mortality associated with the 1998 El Nino event has a role in this.

How many species of corals are found in the world?

At a best count, somewhere between 800 to1000 species. Nobody knows exactly how many because we don’t know all of them. We may not know yet those corals that live in deeper waters or remote reef areas. Sometimes the same coral species is called by different names in different countries. However, we can safely say that at least 800 species are known so far.

How many coral species occur in India? Are there any corals unique to India?

206 species of corals are known from Indian reefs, with a majority of them occurring in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Some coral species such as Porites mannarensis are unique to India. This is natural because we can’t expect all species to be cosmopolitan in distribution.

Is the precious red coral one among them?

We are so much used to the idea of red coral in jewelry, we tend to think it should be unique to India! The red coral, called Corallum rubrum, is not a reef coral at all. It is a stony coral without zooxanthellae. The red colour comes from natural pigmentation of the skeleton that remains even after the death of the polyp. Again, unlike the reef corals that are porous (with cavities in the skeleton), the red coral is dense and compact. So, it can be shaped or machined without breakage. That is how coral beads are cut for jewelry. The red coral occurs only in the Mediterranean Sea and off Japan from shallow depths up to 1000 meters. They are collected by dragging wooden frames over seabed and breaking off the branches. Some fishermen from Mediterranean coasts are also known to collect them by skin diving. Like the red corals, the black corals and blue corals also retain the colour after death.

Are there other corals that are different from the ones we see on a reef?

Yes, there are several of them. They resemble the true corals but do not have zooxanthellae. They occur sometimes in profusion in deeper parts of the reefs. The fire coral, tree coral, wire coral, sea fan and sea fern are some such corals.

Some cousins of the stony corals are called soft corals. These are large ones, several cm in diameter: they lack a true skeleton but have spicules (spiny material) in their tissues which give them a leathery and tough consistency. Soft corals also occur profusely in most coral reefs. They are an interesting group of animals because several of them are sources of bioactive compounds.

This end the Coral Story , hope you have got all your doubts clarified.


 

Share is Caring, Choose Your Platform!

Recent Posts

  • Context:-

    At the recently concluded Leaders’ Summit on Climate in April 2021, Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund plan that shall be offered to countries committed to arrest the decline of their tropical forests by 2030.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    What is LEAF Coalition?

    • Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition, a collective of the United States, United Kingdom and Norway governments, came up with a $1 billion fund.
    • LEAF is supported by transnational corporations (TNCs) like Unilever plc, Amazon.com, Inc, Nestle, Airbnb, Inc as well as Emergent, a US-based non-profit.

    Why LEAF Coalition?

    • The world lost more than 10 million hectares of primary tropical forest cover last year, an area roughly the size of Switzerland.
    • Ending tropical and subtropical forest loss by 2030 is a crucial part of meeting global climate, biodiversity and sustainable development goals. Protecting tropical forests offers one of the biggest opportunities for climate action in the coming decade.
    • Tropical forests are massive carbon sinks and by investing in their protection, public and private players are likely to stock up on their carbon credits.
    • The LEAF coalition initiative is a step towards concretising the aims and objectives of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism.
    • REDD+ was created by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It monetised the value of carbon locked up in the tropical forests of most developing countries, thereby propelling these countries to help mitigate climate change.
    • It is a unique initiative as it seeks to help developing countries in battling the double-edged sword of development versus ecological commitment. 
    • The initiative comes at a crucial time. The tropics have lost close to 12.2 million hectares (mha) of tree cover last year according to global estimates released by Global Forest Watch.
    • Of this, a loss of 4.2 mha occurred within humid tropical primary forests alone. It should come as no surprise that most of these lost forests were located in the developing countries of Latin America, Africa and South Asia.
    • Brazil has fared dismally on the parameter of ‘annual primary forest loss’ among all countries. It has lost 1.7 mha of primary forests that are rich storehouse of carbon. India’s estimated loss in 2020 stands at 20.8 kilo hectares.

    Brazil & India 

    • Between 2002-2020, Brazil’s total area of humid primary forest reduced by 7.7 per cent while India’s reduced by 3.4 per cent.
    • Although the loss in India is not as drastic as in Brazil, its position is nevertheless precarious. For India, this loss is equivalent to 951 metric tonnes worth carbon dioxide emissions released in the atmosphere.
    • It is important to draw comparisons between Brazil and India as both countries have adopted a rather lackadaisical attitude towards deforestation-induced climate change. The Brazilian government hardly did anything to control the massive fires that gutted the Amazon rainforest in 2019.
    • It is mostly around May that forest fires peak in India. However, this year India, witnessed massive forest fires in early March in states like Odisha, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh and Mizoram among others.
    • The European Union’s Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service claimed that 0.2 metric tonnes of carbon was emitted in the Uttarakhand forest fires.

    According to the UN-REDD programme, after the energy sector, deforestation accounts for massive carbon emissions — close to 11 per cent — in the atmosphere. Rapid urbanisation and commercialisation of forest produce are the main causes behind rampant deforestation across tropical forests.

    Tribes, Forests and Government

    Disregarding climate change as a valid excuse for the fires, Indian government officials were quick to lay the blame for deforestation on activities of forest dwellers and even labelled them “mischievous elements” and “unwanted elements”.

    Policy makers around the world have emphasised the role of indigenous tribes and local communities in checking deforestation. These communities depend on forests for their survival as well as livelihood. Hence, they understand the need to protect forests. However, by posing legitimate environmental concerns as obstacles to real development, governments of developing countries swiftly avoid protection of forests and rights of forest dwellers.

    For instance, the Government of India has not been forthcoming in recognising the socio-economic, civil, political or even cultural rights of forest dwellers. According to data from the Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs in December, 2020 over 55 per cent of this population has still not been granted either individual or community ownership of their lands.  

    To make matters worse, the government has undertaken systematic and sustained measures to render the landmark Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 ineffective in its implementation. The Act had sought to legitimise claims of forest dwellers on occupied forest land.

    Various government decisions have seriously undermined the position of indigenous people within India. These include proposing amendments to the obsolete Indian Forest Act, 1927 that give forest officials the power to take away forest dwellers’ rights and to even use firearms with impunity.

    There is also the Supreme Court’s order of February, 2019 directing state governments to evict illegal encroachers of forest land or millions of forest dwellers inhabiting forests since generations as a measure to conserve wildlife. Finally, there is the lack of data on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) deaths among the forest dwelling population;

    Tardy administration, insufficient supervision, apathetic attitude and a lack of political intent defeat the cause of forest dwelling populations in India, thereby directly affecting efforts at arresting deforestation.

    Way Forward

    • Implementation of the LEAF Coalition plan will help pump in fresh rigour among developing countries like India, that are reluctant to recognise the contributions of their forest dwelling populations in mitigating climate change.
    • With the deadline for proposal submission fast approaching, India needs to act swiftly on a revised strategy.
    • Although India has pledged to carry out its REDD+ commitments, it is impossible to do so without seeking knowledge from its forest dwelling population.

    Tuntiak Katan, a global indigenous leader from Ecuador and general coordinator of the Global Alliance of Territorial Communities, aptly indicated the next steps at the Climate Summit:

    “The first step is recognition of land rights. The second step is the recognition of the contributions of local communities and indigenous communities, meaning the contributions of indigenous peoples.We also need recognition of traditional knowledge practices in order to fight climate change”

    Perhaps India can begin by taking the first step.


    INTRODUCTION:-

    The Constitution of India was adopted on 26 November 1949, which means it was finalised by the Constituent Assembly on that day. But it became operative two months after its adoption, i.e., on 26 January 1950, which is also known as the date of its “commencement”.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    However, some provisions of it, i.e., those relating to citizenship, elections, provisional Parliament, temporary and transitional provisions had become operative on 26 November 1949 itself. The reason for its commencement after two months of its adoption was to signify the January 26 as the original date of achievement of Independence.

    It was this day, i.e. 26th January, in 1930 which the Indian National Congress (INC) had first celebrated as the Independence Day of India. It is important to note that the Constitution of India is product of a longdrawn process and deliberations.

    EVOLUTION OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION 1858-1935

    The Constitution of India embodies provisions providing basic democratic rights of human beings including the persons who are not Indian citizens. It also embodies provisions for the availability of institutions for legislation, execution and jurisdiction for the fulfilment these rights.

    It presents a vision for social transformation and deepening of democracy in India. The process of evolution of democratic institutions and rights had started much before the Constituent Assembly really made the Constitution of India.

    It, however, must be underlined that the features of democratic institutions and values which were introduced during the colonial period were meant to serve the colonial interests in contrast to the purpose of the provisions of the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly of India.

    Although the Indian Constitution was result of the deliberations (from December 9, 1947 to November 26, 1949) of the Constituent Assembly, some of its features had evolved over three quarters of a century through various Acts, i.e., from 1858 to 1935.

    The Government of India Act, 1935, and Other Acts

    With the transfer of power from the East India Company to the British Crown, the British Parliament got involved in managing affairs of India. For achieving this purpose, from 1858 till 1935, the colonial government introduced certain features of constitution or rules of governance through different Acts. The Government of India Act, 1935 was the most important among these Acts.

    First of these other Acts was Government of India Act, 1858. It provided for a combination of centralised and decetralised power structure to govern India. The centralised structure was introduced in the areas which were under the direct control of the Crown. These areas were known as British India provinces or provinces. The decentralized structure was introduced in the areas which were not under the direct control of the Crown. These areas were ruled by the Indian princes, and were known as princely states or states.

    Under this system, the princes had freedom to govern in all internal matters of their princely states, but they were subject to the British control. In the centralized structure of power which was introduced in the provinces, all powers to govern India vested in the Secretary of State for India (and through him in the Crown). He acted on behalf of the Crown.

    He was assisted by a fifteen-member council of ministers.There did not exist separation of executive, legislative and judicial functions of government; these all were concentrated in the hands of the Secretary of State for India. In British India, the Secretary of State of India was assisted by the Viceroy, who was assisted by an executive council.

    At the district level, the viceroy was assisted by a small number of British administrators. The provincial government did not have financial autonomy. In 1870 viceroy Lord Mayo ensured that all parts of provincial administration received due share of revenue to meet their needs.

    The scope of political institutions in the provinces was expanded a little further following the introduction of Council of India Act, 1909. This Act introduced for the first time a “representative element” in British India, which included elected non-official members.This Act also introduced separate representation to Muslim community.

    The Government of India Act 1919 devolved some authority to the provincial governments, retaining the control of the central government (unitary government) on them.It relaxed the control of the central government in a limited way. It divided the subjects for jurisdiction of administration and sources of revenue between centre and provinces.

    Under this arrangement, the provincial government was given control on resources of revenue such as land, irrigation and judicial stamps. The provincial subjects were divided into “transferred’ and “reserved” categories.

    The “transferred” subjects were governed by the governor, and “reserved” subjects were governed by the legislature. The governor (executive head) was not accountable to the legislature.

    The Government of India Act, 1935 was different from the earlier Government of India Acts. Unlike the earlier Acts, the Government of India Act, 1935 also provided for provincial government enjoying provincial autonomy. It provided “safeguards” for minorities.

    Such “safeguards” included provisions for separate representations to Muslims, Sikhs, the Europeans, Indian Christians and Anglo-Indians. This Act also provided for three lists of divisions of power between the federation (central government) and provinces: federal (central), concurrent and provincial.

    The Act also provided for establishment of a federal court to adjudicate disputes between federation and provinces. The executive head of the provincial government was Governor, who enjoyed special power. Under the special power the Governor could veto the decisions of the provincial legislature.

    He acted on behalf of the Crown, and was not a subordinate of the Governor-General (the changed designation of Viceroy). He enjoyed discretionary powers to exercise his “individual judgments” in certain matters. In such matters, he did not need to work under the advice of ministers: he was to act under the control of the Governor-General, and indeed the Secretary of the State.

    He was also not accountable to the legislature but he was required to act on the advice of ministers, who were accountable to the legislature.

    Government of India Act, 1935 also had provisions for setting up a central government consisting of representatives from the provinces(areas ruled by the British India government) and the states (the areas covered under princely states).Such government was supposed to be known as federal government because of composition with members both from provinces and the states.

    However, the federal government could not be formed because there was no unanimity among the princes to join the federation; consent of all princes was essential for the formation of federation. Thus, only the provincial governments could be formed as per this Act.

    And election to the provincial legislature as per the Government of India Act, 1935 was held in 1937. Following the election of 1937, provincial governments headed by the Indian National Congresswere formed in eight provinces. The Indian National Congress government resigned in 1937. Nevertheless, according to M. Govinda Rao and Nirvikar Singh (2005), the Government of India Act, 1935 provided a basis to the Constituent Assembly to make the Constitution.

    The Nehru Report(1928): First Indian Initiative to Draft Constitution

    As you have read above, attempts to introduce elements of constitution in British India through different Act since 1858 were made by the British rulers. Indians had no role in it.

    The first attempt by Indians themselves to prepare a Constitution of India was made in the Nehru Report(1928).Earlier, effort by Indians was made in the name of the swaraj (self-rule) by leaders of Indian national movement during the non-cooperation movement in 1921-22.

    The Nehru Report was known as such because it was named after the chairman of its drafting committee, Motilal Nehru. The decision to constitute the drafting committee was taken in the conference of the established All India parties. The principal among these parties included Indian National Congress, Swaraj Party and Muslim League. The Justice Party of Madras and Unionist Party of Punjab did not participate in this meeting.

    The Nehru Report demanded universal suffrage for adults and responsible government both in the centre and in the provinces. It, however, supported the Dominion Status, not complete independence for India.

    It meant that Indians would have freedom to legislate on certain limited matters under the control of the British India government. For this, the Nehru Report prepared list of central and provincial subjects, and fundamental rights. It also raised demands for universal suffrage for men and women adults.

    Indeed, it was in 1934, a few years after the preparation of the Nehru report, that the Indian National Congress officially demanded a constitution of Indian people, without the interference of outsiders.

    FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY

    The Cripps Mission

    Initially, the colonial authorities resisted the demand for creation of a Constitution of India. But with the change in the circumstances – the outbreak of the World War II and formation of the new Coalition (Labour-led) government in Britain, the British government was forced to acknowledge the urgency to solve the problem related to Constitution of Indians.

    In 1942, the British government sent its cabinet member – Sir Stafford Cripps with the draft declaration on proposals (regarding formation of constitution for Indians) to be implemented at the end of the WW II provided both the Muslim League and the Indian National Congress had agreed to accept them.

    The draft proposals of the Cripps Mission recommended the following:

    1. providing Dominion Status to India, i.e., equal partnership of the British Commonwealth of Nations;
    2. all Provinces (ruled by the British India government) and Indian States (ruled by Indian princes) should constitute one Indian Union by the British Constitution;
    3. the Constitution of India should be framed by an elected Constituent Assembly of Indian people but if any province (or Indian State) which was not prepared to accept the Constitution was to be free to retain its constitutional position which had existed at that time.
    4. Such provinces were to be free to enter separate constitutional arrangements.

    Both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League did not accept the proposals of the Cripps Mission. The Muslim League demanded that India should be divided on the communal lines and some provinces should form an independent state of Pakistan; and, there should be two Constituent Assemblies, one for Pakistan and another for India.

    The Cabinet Mission

    The British Indian government made several attempts to bridge the differences between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League. But it was unsuccessful.

    The British government sent another delegation of the Cabinet members, known as the Cabinet Delegation, which came to be known as the Cabinet Mission Plan. It consisted of three cabinet members – Lord Pathic Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps and Mr. A.V. Alexander.

    The Cabinet Delegation also failed to bring the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League to an agreement. It, however, made its own proposal which was announced simultaneously on 16 May, 1946 in England as well as in India.

    The Cabinet delegation made the following recommendations:

    1. there should a Union of India consisting of British India and the States, which would have jurisdiction over subjects of Foreign Affairs, Defense and Communication;
    2. all residuary powers would belong to the Provinces and the States;
    3. the Union would have Executive and Legislature consisting of the representatives from the Provinces and the States but for decision relating to a major communal issue in the legislature a majority of representatives of two major communities would be present, and voting along with the majority of all members present and voting would be required;
    4. the provinces would be free to form Groups with executives and legislatures;
    5. and each group would be free to determine the Provincial Subjects which would be taken up by the Group organisation.

    Election to the Constituent Assembly

    Meanwhile, according to the proposals of the Cabinet Mission, the election to the Constituent Assembly was held in which members of both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League were returned. The members of the Constituent Assembly were elected by the Provincial Legislative Assemblies.

    However, differences between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League arose on interpretation of “Group Clauses” of the Cabinet Mission.

    The British government intervened at this stage and explained to the leaders in London that the contention of the Muslim League was correct. And on December 6, 1946, the British Government published a statement, which for the first time acknowledged the possibility of two Constituent Assemblies and two States.

    As a result, when the Constituent Assembly first met on December 9, 1946, it was boycotted by the Muslim League, and it functioned without the participation of the Muslim League.

    NATURE OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY’S REPRESENTATION

    It is often argued that the Constituent Assembly of India did not represent the masses of India because its representatives were not elected through the universal adult franchise. Rather they were indirectly elected by the restricted adult franchise confined to the elite sections of society – the educated and tax payers.

    According to Granville Austin the reasons for the restricted franchise and indirect election to the Constituent Assembly members were spelled by the Cabinet Mission Plan. These were to avoid the cumbersome and slow progress in the process of Constitution making.

    The Cabinet Mission provided for the indirect election to the Constituent Assembly by the elected members of the provincial legislature. The Indian National Congress agreed to this proposal of the Cabinet Mission forsaking the claim of adult franchise to hold election to the Constituent Assembly.

    Despite having been elected through the restricted adult franchise, the Constituent Assembly represented different shades of opinions and religious communities of India. Austin observed that though there was a majority of the Indian National Congress in the Constituent Assembly, it had an “unwritten and unquestioned belief” that the Indian National Congress should represent social and ideological diversity.

    There was also its “deliberate policy” that the representatives of various minority communities and viewpoints should be represented in the Constituent Assembly. The Constituent Assembly consisted of members with different ideological orientations, and three religious communities -Sikhs, Muslims and General (Hindus and all other communities like the Anglo-Indians, Parsis, etc).

    In words of K. Santaram “There was hardly any shade of opinion not represented in the Assembly”. Majority of the Constituent Assembly members belonged to the Indian National Congress. It also included more than a dozen non-Indian National Congress members.

    Some of these were A.K. Ayyer, H.N. Kunjru, N.G. Ayyanger, S.P. Mukherjee and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. S.P. Mookerji represented the Hindu Mahasabha.

    The Constituent Assembly included representatives from the Princely States as well. It needs to be underscored that Dr. Ambedkar was initially elected to the Constituent Assembly from Bengal as member of the Scheduled Caste Federation. But he lost this seat due to the partition of Bengal and was re-elected by the Bombay Indian National Congress (as a non-Indian National Congress candidate) at the request of the Indian National Congress High Command.

    The Constituent Assembly sought to address concerns of every person irrespective of their social and cultural orientations. Before incorporating a provision in the constitution, it held elaborate deliberations. Thus, the members of the Constituent Assembly could overcome the limitations of having been elected by the restricted franchise.

    The Constituent Assembly sought to accommodate universal values of democracy. The Constituent Assembly adopted several provisions from different constitutions of world and adapted them to the needs of India. In fact, Austin argues that while incorporating different provisions in the Constitution including those which were borrowed from other countries the Constituent Assembly adopted “two wholly Indian concepts” of resolving differences among its members, i.e., consensus and accommodation.

    Most members of the Constituent Assembly participated in its proceedings. But these were twenty individuals who played the most influential role in the Assembly.

    Some of them were Rajendra Prasad, Maulan Azad, Vallabhbhai Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru, Govind Ballabh Pant, P. Sitaramayya, A.K. Ayyar, N.G. Ayyangar, K.M. Munshi, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Satyanarayan Sinha. Though the Constituent Assembly was the sole forum where deliberations took place, yet the deliberations took place in coordination of three bodies – the Constituent Assembly, the Indian National Congress Party, and the interim government.

    Some members of the Constituent Assembly were also members of other bodies at the same time. Austin said that “an oligarchy” of four – Nehru, Patel, Prasad and Azad had enjoyed unquestioned honour and prestige in the Assembly. They dominated the proceedings of the Constituent Assembly.Some of these were simultaneously in the government, Indian National Congress Party and the Constituent Assembly.

    Prasad was President of Indian National Congress before becoming the President of the Constituent Assembly. Patel and Nehru were Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister respectively at the same time. They were part of the inner circles of the committees of the Constituent Assembly.

    The Constitution Drafting Committee meticulously incorporated in the draft constitution the decisions of the Constituent Assembly. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, chairman of the Drafting Committee played the leading role in drafting of the Constitution.

    Acknowledging the pivotal role of Dr. Ambedkar, T.T. Krishnamachari, a member of the Drafting Committee, said in one of his speeches: “The House is perhaps aware that out of the seven members nominated by you, one had resigned from the house and was replaced. One had died and was not replaced. One was away in America and his place was not filled up, and another person was engaged in State Affairs, and there was a void to that extent. One or two people were far away from Delhi and perhaps reasons of health did not permit them to attend. So it happened ultimately that the burden of drafting this constitution fell upon Dr. Ambedkar and I have no doubt that we are grateful to him for having achieved this task in a manner which is undoubtedly commendable.”

    Dr. Ambedkar on his part “gave much of credit” to S.N. Mukerjee – B.N. Rau’s and Ambedkar’s assistant, the Drafting Officer of the Assembly, “for the careful wording of the Constitution”.

    THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY IN THE MAKING OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION 1946-1949

    The inaugural session of the Constituent Assembly was held on 9 December 1946. It was supposed to be attended by all 296 members but only 207 members could attend it because the Muslim League members absented from it.

    As stated earlier, they had boycotted the Constituent Assembly. In this meeting, Acharya J.B. Kripalani requested Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha to be the temporary chairman of the House. The members passed a resolution on 10 December 1946 for election of a permanent chairman, and on 11 December 1946, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent Chairman of the Constituent Assembly.

    The Constituent Assembly divided its work among different committees for its smooth functioning. Some of the important committees were:

    (a) Union Power Committee. It was chaired by Jawaharlal Nehru and had nine members;

    (b) Committee on Fundamental Rights and Minorities. It had 54 members and Sardar Ballabh bhai Patel was its chairman;

    (c) Steering Committee and its 3 members which included Dr. K.M. Munshi (chairman), Gopalaswami Iyangar and Bhagwan Das;

    (d) Provincial Constitution Committee. It had 25 members with Sardar Patel as its chairman;

    (e) Committee on Union Constitution. It had 15 members with Jawahalal Nehru as its chairman.

    After discussing the reports of these committees, the Constituent Assembly appointed a Drafting Committee on 29 August 1947 under the chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedakar. The draft was prepared by Sir B.N. Rau, Advisor to the Constituent Assembly.

    A 7-member Committee was constituted to examine the draft. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who was Law Minister as well as chairman of the Drafting Committee piloted the draft in the Assembly. Dr. Ambedkar presented “Draft Constitution of India”. The “Draft Constitution” was published in February, 1948.

    It was discussed by the Constituent Assembly clause by in its several sessions and was completed by October 17, 1949. This discussion was known as the second reading. The Constituent Assembly again met on 14 November 1949 to discuss the draft further or to give it a third reading.

    It was finalised on 26 November 1949 after receiving the signature of the President of the Constituent Assembly. But it was January 26, 1950 which became the date of commencement of the Constitution.

    SALIENT FEATURES OF THE CONSTITUION

    The Indian Constitution has some salient features. These features give Indian Constitution a distinct identity. It is based on the features of different constitutions of the world. In the words of Dr. Ambedkar, The Indian constitution was prepared “after ransacking all the known Constitutions of the world”.

    The chapter on Fundamental Rights  is based on the American Constitution; the Parliamentary System has been adopted from the British Constitution; the Directive Principles of State Policy  have been adopted from the constitution of Ireland; the Emergency provisions  are based on the Constitution of Weimar (Germany) and Government of India Act, 1935.

    The features which have been borrowed from other Constitutions have been modified in the light of the needs of our country. It is the longest written constitution. At the time of its formation, the constitution of India had 395 Articles and 8 Schedules. It ensures both Justiciable and Non-Justiciable Rights: Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of the State Policy.The constituent makers preferred universal adult franchise over the separate electorates. 

    Universal Adult Suffrage and Abolition of the Separate Electorate

    After debating its draft list of Fundamental rights the Sub-Committee on Fundamental Rights did not recommend inclusion of all of them in the section III of the Constitution as the Fundamental Rights. Instead, it suggested that these should be incorporated in other places in the Constitution.

    One such example is that of the Universal suffrage, and Secrete and periodic elections. The sub Committee agreed unanimously in favour of the Universal suffrage but suggested that it should not be part of the Fundamental Rights.

    Accordingly, it was placed in the Article 326 of the Part XV on election.The word “universal”, however, is missing from the Article 326. But the fact that every adult citizen of the country is entitled to vote makes it practically a universal adult franchise.

    In fact, before Indians really got the right to universal adult franchise, the prominent leaders of the Indian National movement strove for the abolition of the separate electorate in favour of the joint electorate.

    The British had sought to continue separate electorate in India since the Morley-Minto reforms, 1909 till the Communal Award of 1932 in the Constitution.

    The Communal Award aimed to accord separate electorate for Muslims, Europeans, Sikhs, Indian Christians and Anglo-Indians. It also provided for seats for the Depressed Classes which were to be filled in elections from special constituencies. In such constituencies only the depressed classes could vote.

    In addition, the depressed classes were also entitled to vote in general constituencies. Gandhi opposed the recommendation of the notion of separate electorate for the depressed classes. In opposition to the proposal for separate electorate, he set on fast unto death in September 1932. Gandhi’s fast evoked opposition from Ambedkar. However, both Gandhi and Ambedkar reached compromise in Poona Pact.

    According to the Poona Pact, seats were reserved for the depressed classes in the general constituencies. This resulted in the abolition of the separate electorate.The abolition of separate electorate got reflected in the reservation of seats in the legislative bodies Constitution.

    CONCLUSION

    The making of Indian Constitution largely consisted of two phases – 1858 to 1935 and 1946 to 1949. With the transfer of power from the East India Company to the British Crown, the British government introduced different elements of governance through different Acts.

    These also included the elements of representation of Indians in the institutions of governance. The motive of the British to introduce them was to serve their colonial interests rather than to provide democratic rights to them. The provision for communal representation introduced through the Morley-Minto Reforms in 1909 and through the Communal Award in 1932 was opposed by the leaders of the Indian National Movement.

    Gandhi’s fast resulted in the Poona Pact abolishing the separate electorate and in giving the reservation to the depressed classes in the provincial legislature. After the Indian National Congress emphasized the need for making of a Constitution of India by their own Constitient Assembly, the changed political situation following the Second World War and change of government in Britain, the British reluctantly realized the urgency for establishment of the Constituent Assembly of India for Indians.

    The Constituent Assembly which was set up following the recommendations of the Cabinet Mission Plan was elected through the restricted adult franchise by the provincial assemblies. Despite having elected by the privileged sections of the society, the Constituent Assembly represented different shades of opinions and ideologies.

    It also represented different social groups of India. The Constituent Assembly discussed all issues thoroughly before reaching decision on them. The decision and suggestions of different sub-Committees of the Constituent Assembly were finally incorporated in the Constitution of India.

    The Constitution of India is a document which provides a vision for social change. The Constitution is an embodiment of principles of liberal democracy and secularism, with some elements of social democracy. It ensures protection of cultural, linguistic and religious rights of individuals and communities.