The health policy of India aims at an integrated approach, which is to provide accessible, affordable and equitable quality health care to the marginalised and vulnerable sections. For a heavily populated country such as India, this is an uphill task.
However, the aim of good health and well-being for all is envisaged in the sustainable development goal (SDG) 3. To quote, it envisages to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”, which provides an impetus to the policies of India to synchronise all our health targets.
The top 4 improving health indices are:
1. Doubling of life expectancy and reducing crude death rate
India is seeing Life expectancy that has doubled coupled with infant mortality and crude death rates that have reduced sharply.
Life expectancy is understood to be a statistical measure of the average time one is expected to live, based on the year of their birth, their current age and other demographic factors including sex.
The crude death rate of mortality rate, on the other hand, is a measure of the number of deaths (in general, or due to a specific cause) in a particular population, scaled to the size of that population, per unit of time. The mortality rate is typically expressed in units of deaths per 1,000 individuals per year; thus, a mortality rate of 9.5 (out of 1,000) in a population of 1,000 would mean 9.5 deaths per year in that entire population or 0.95 percent out of the total.
As per the WHO’s World Statistics Report 2016, life expectancy at birth for the year 2015 was 68.3 years in India which breaks down to 66.9 years for men and 69.9 years for women.
On the other hand, as per the ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India, the crude death rate for India worked out to be 7.31 in 2015. India has seen its decadal crude death rate decline to 8.5 in 2001-2011 from 42.6 in 1901-1911. Though the death rates have come down, the rural-urban divide still remains – the death rate was 6 in urban areas and it was 8.2 in rural areas in 2001-2011.
2. Declining total fertility rate
India’s total fertility rate (TFR) has been steadily declining and was 2.3 (rural 2.5 and urban 1.8) during 2014. Total fertility rate can be understood as the number of children who would be born per woman (or per 1,000 women) if she/they were to pass through the childbearing years bearing children according to a current schedule of age-specific fertility rates.
3. Declining infant mortality rate
Infant mortality rate (IMR) has declined to 37 per 1000 live births in 2015 from 44 in 2011. The challenge lies in addressing the huge gap between IMR in rural (41 per 1000 live births) and urban (25 per 1000 live births) areas.
Infant mortality refers to deaths of young children, typically those less than one year of age. It is measured by the infant mortality rate (IMR), which is the number of deaths of children under one year of age per 1000 live births.
4. Declining maternal mortality ratio
The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) declined from 301 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births during 2001-03 to 167 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births during 2011-13. The maternal mortality rate (MMR) may be understood to be the annual number of female deaths per 100,000 live births from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management (excluding accidental or incidental causes).
There are wide regional disparities in MMR, with States like Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar recording MMR well above all India MMR of 167. Therefore, in addition to reducing all India MMR in line with SDG 3 targets, by improving health policy and nutritional status of women, there is need to focus on States with MMR higher than the national average.
Conclusion:
Although the basic health parameters are showing an upward rise, there is a huge gap in access to quality health care in India and hence health policy may require some tweaking. There are chronic diseases that plague the population. Primary amongst these seem to be the prevalence of high levels of anaemia among women in the age group 15-49 leading to high levels of maternal mortality.
In Haryana and West Bengal more than 60 percent of women suffers from anaemia. Under the National Health Mission, Government of India has programmes to address the issue of anaemia through health policy and nutrition education to promote dietary diversification, the inclusion of iron foliate rich food as well as food items that promote iron absorption.

 

Receive Daily Updates

Stay updated with current events, tests, material and UPSC related news

Recent Posts

    2021 WEF Global Gender Gap report, which confirmed its 2016 finding of a decline in worldwide progress towards gender parity.

    [wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]

    Over 2.8 billion women are legally restricted from having the same choice of jobs as men. As many as 104 countries still have laws preventing women from working in specific jobs, 59 countries have no laws on sexual harassment in the workplace, and it is astonishing that a handful of countries still allow husbands to legally stop their wives from working.

    Globally, women’s participation in the labour force is estimated at 63% (as against 94% of men who participate), but India’s is at a dismal 25% or so currently. Most women are in informal and vulnerable employment—domestic help, agriculture, etc—and are always paid less than men.

    Recent reports from Assam suggest that women workers in plantations are paid much less than men and never promoted to supervisory roles. The gender wage gap is about 24% globally, and women have lost far more jobs than men during lockdowns.

    The problem of gender disparity is compounded by hurdles put up by governments, society and businesses: unequal access to social security schemes, banking services, education, digital services and so on, even as a glass ceiling has kept leadership roles out of women’s reach.

    Yes, many governments and businesses had been working on parity before the pandemic struck. But the global gender gap, defined by differences reflected in the social, political, intellectual, cultural and economic attainments or attitudes of men and women, will not narrow in the near future without all major stakeholders working together on a clear agenda—that of economic growth by inclusion.

    The WEF report estimates 135 years to close the gap at our current rate of progress based on four pillars: educational attainment, health, economic participation and political empowerment.

    India has slipped from rank 112 to 140 in a single year, confirming how hard women were hit by the pandemic. Pakistan and Afghanistan are the only two Asian countries that fared worse.

    Here are a few things we must do:

    One, frame policies for equal-opportunity employment. Use technology and artificial intelligence to eliminate biases of gender, caste, etc, and select candidates at all levels on merit. Numerous surveys indicate that women in general have a better chance of landing jobs if their gender is not known to recruiters.

    Two, foster a culture of gender sensitivity. Take a review of current policies and move from gender-neutral to gender-sensitive. Encourage and insist on diversity and inclusion at all levels, and promote more women internally to leadership roles. Demolish silos to let women grab potential opportunities in hitherto male-dominant roles. Work-from-home has taught us how efficiently women can manage flex-timings and productivity.

    Three, deploy corporate social responsibility (CSR) funds for the education and skilling of women and girls at the bottom of the pyramid. CSR allocations to toilet building, the PM-Cares fund and firms’ own trusts could be re-channelled for this.

    Four, get more women into research and development (R&D) roles. A study of over 4,000 companies found that more women in R&D jobs resulted in radical innovation. It appears women score far higher than men in championing change. If you seek growth from affordable products and services for low-income groups, women often have the best ideas.

    Five, break barriers to allow progress. Cultural and structural issues must be fixed. Unconscious biases and discrimination are rampant even in highly-esteemed organizations. Establish fair and transparent human resource policies.

    Six, get involved in local communities to engage them. As Michael Porter said, it is not possible for businesses to sustain long-term shareholder value without ensuring the welfare of the communities they exist in. It is in the best interest of enterprises to engage with local communities to understand and work towards lowering cultural and other barriers in society. It will also help connect with potential customers, employees and special interest groups driving the gender-equity agenda and achieve better diversity.