Background:- Surrogacy has been a major debate across India , since the beginning of 21st century. Almost a decade has passed since the curious case of Baby Manji (explained below), we are yet to have a robust framework of regulation. The reason are quite simple though. The whole concept of surrogacy has consequences that travels in to many spheres – Social , economic , religious , ideology , science and ethics . To understand it and to comprehend properly ,one needs a little deeper understanding , and more often than not we have come across brilliant articles and write-ups by many learned man, but almost all of them explore certain aspects of surrogacy and the theme usually does not delve in to all spheres.Its a matter of great significance. Hence we at UPSCTREE , tried to contemplate this particular issue , in order to give it a holistic understanding .
Introduction :-
Definition :- Surrogacy, a practice in which a woman agrees to carry a child to term for a couple who will then keep the child as their own.
Type :- Fundamentally, there are two types of surrogacy — traditional surrogacy and gestational surrogacy.
In traditional surrogacy, a surrogate mother is artificially inseminated, either by the intended father or an anonymous donor, and carries the baby to term. The child is thereby genetically related to both the surrogate mother, who provides the egg, and the intended father or anonymous donor.
In gestational surrogacy, an egg is removed from the intended mother or an anonymous donor and fertilized with the sperm of the intended father or anonymous donor. The fertilized egg, or embryo, is then transferred to a surrogate who carries the baby to term. The child is thereby genetically related to the woman who donated the egg and the intended father or sperm donor, but not the surrogate
Monetary compensation may or may not be involved in surrogacy arrangements. If the surrogate receives compensation beyond the reimbursement of medical and other reasonable expenses, the arrangement is called Commercial surrogacy; otherwise, it is often referred to as altruistic surrogacy.The concern here is largely based upon the commercial surrogacy
While traditional and gestational are simply methods of surrogacy or so to say Science , Commercial surrogacy is altogether different and is a product of economics.
Commercial Surrogacy and India:-
Commercial surrogacy in India is legal since 2002. The availability of medical infrastructure and potential surrogates, combined with international demand, has fueled the growth of the industry.Surrogate mothers receive medical, nutritional and overall health care through surrogacy agreements.
Commercial surrogacy is a product of a contract , hence it makes sense to understand the legal aspect of it first .
Legal aspects of Surrogacy:-
The curious case of Baby Manji :-
- Japanese couple Ikufumi and Yuki Yamada traveled to India in late 2007 to discuss with fertility specialist Dr. Nayna Patel their desire to hire a surrogate mother to bear a child for them. The doctor arranged a surrogacy contract with Pritiben Mehta, a married Indian woman with children. Dr. Patel supervised the creation of an embryo from Ikufumi Yamada’s sperm and an egg harvested from an anonymous Indian woman. The embryo was then implanted into Mehta’s womb.
- In June 2008, the Yamadas divorced, and a month later Baby Manji was born to the surrogate mother. Although Ikufami wanted to raise the child, his ex-wife did not.Suddenly, Baby Manji had three mothers—the intended mother who had contracted for the surrogacy, the egg donor, and the gestational surrogate—yet legally she had none.
- The surrogacy contract did not cover a situation such as this. Nor did any existing laws help to clarify the matter. Both the parentage and the nationality of Baby Manji were impossible to determine under existing definitions of family and citizenship under Indian and Japanese law. The situation soon grew into a legal and diplomatic crisis. The case of Baby Manji illustrates the complexity and challenges faced by institutions in the face of emerging technologies.
- At first Yamada tried to secure documents to take the baby to Japan. But the Japanese Embassy in India refused to grant Manji a Japanese passport or visa. The Japanese Civil Code recognizes as the mother only the woman who gives birth to a baby. The code does not recognize surrogate children. In this case, the woman who birthed Manji was Indian, not Japanese, which meant Manji was not entitled to a Japanese passport.
- Yamada’s next stop was the Indian government. For a time, even though he was her genetic father, it looked as though he would have to adopt Manji. Because Indian laws don’t address commercial surrogacy, the genetic parents of babies born via surrogacy are required to adopt them. Again Yamada hit a legal snag: A 120-year-old law (Guardians and Wards Act 1890) does not allow single men to adopt baby girls.
The case of Baby Manji throws light on the legal entangle surrounding surrogacy. The reason behind this cobweb is simple – most of our laws are product of situations in society, while science has progressed as far as Assisted Reproductive technology and genetic engineering , we don’t have the necessary legal framework that define and draws the line between what is legal and what is illegal.
As of now , the surrogacy is addressed by a guideline issued by Indian Council for Medical Research. Though , the guidelines addresses on how to and what to do ,it is being a guideline – can not be enforceable in case of any abuse.Thus , it requires a Law that could address the issue .
The next theme to understand surrogacy is its commercial nature.
Economic aspects of Surrogacy:-
- Surrogacy became an industry in India and to label it as fertility tourism would do justice to it.
- The availability of medical infrastructure and potential surrogates, combined with international demand, has fueled the growth of the industry.Surrogate mothers receive medical, nutritional and overall health care through surrogacy agreements.
- India is a favorable destination for foreign couples who look for a cost-effective treatment for infertility and a whole branch of medical tourism has flourished on the surrogate practice.
Surrogacy as Labour:-
- It is worth noting that while commercial surrogacy involves an unusual intertwining of women’s reproductive capacities with productive roles, there are some fundamental parallels with other forms of work. For example, surrogates, like factory workers, are asked to give up the product of their labor—in one case, a baby, and in the other, the material objects as well as the surplus value they produce. In both cases, they are also asked to treat their employers’ property as if it were their own, even as they are constantly reminded that it is not.
- The reality in India, is that commercial surrogacy has become a survival strategy and a temporary occupation for some poor rural women, where women are recruited systematically by fertility clinics and matched with clients from India and abroad.
- Identifying commercial surrogacy as labor, susceptible to exploitation like other forms of labor, and by simultaneously recognizing the women as critical agents, we can deconstruct the image of the victim that is inevitably evoked whenever bodies of third-world women are in focus.
- Identifying and persuading women in desperate need of money for their children, the recruitment strategy is founded around the dual image of a mother-worker. Being a mother is not just a medical requirement for a woman to be recruited as a surrogate but also an insidious mechanism to control her as a worker. This interplay of the mother-worker duality continues to underlie the next two steps in the labor process: counseling and the signing of the contract.
- Bringing a needy woman from the village to the clinic is a small first step in the whole process. Economic desperation does not make a perfect surrogate; a new subject has to be produced, a surrogate who is a willing worker and, simultaneously, a virtuous mother.
- The irony :- The irony is that the mother has to be a perfect ,virtuos mother till the baby takes birth and give the baby away immediately . So as long as the baby is in the womb, she is not supposed to treat surrogacy as business , but as soon as the baby is out , the mother has to be a perfect business woman , who respects her contract and gives her child away .The only problem is , no one knows how the emotions comes in to play , and this includes the mother too.
- The surrogacy contract, which lays out the rights of the surrogates, is in English, a language almost none of the surrogates can read. Some essential points of the contract, however, are translated for them.
- Womb-on-Rent:-Doctors usually counsel the mothers as they are just the womb – the transient nature of mothering role is reiterated to them and this prevents them from being attached to the child, as the Doctor’s claim.This renders mother as a disposable worker.
- The ambiguity surrounding commercial surrogacy: it lies somewhere between contractual labor and motherly altruism.
How Surrogacy works:-
- Surrogates typically have two kinds of living arrangement during their nine months of pregnancy: living in the rooms above the clinic or in surrogate hostels
- The women have nothing to do the whole day except pace back and forth on the same floor (they are not allowed to climb the stairs and have to wait for the nurses to operate the elevator), share their woes and experiences with the other surrogates, and wait for the next injection.
- It is similar to any sweat shop , the only difference is that , here the doctors are the supervisors enforcing the contract and they exploit as much as they can to serve the needs of the client and to ensure a better end product- baby.Hence , many literature label it as Baby Farms.
- The hostels or clinics are usually have 2 things common across board – Class on Spoken English(sometimes english lesson with computer lessons) and a prayer hall.These two serve the need of the client very well.
- The computer and English lessons create a better worker (for now and the future) who can communicate more effectively with the couple hiring her, while the elaborate prayer room and scheduled prayer hours emphasize the image of a virtuous, religious,and conservative mother-worker.
- The mothers are happy though ,as they don’t have any manual work to do. They wake up , take tea , take medicine, sleep, wake up ,bathe ,eat lunch and so on , prayer in the evening etc..But they usually forget that they are labour , and this time its not their mind or hand doing the work , instead it is their womb .Motherhood is on sale and mothers are restricted to embrace it, both physically and emotionally.
From the above discourse as surrogacy becomes a tool for economic benefits , poor , illiterate ,rural women are at the mercy of the doctors and agents. Given the economic importance , it is subjected to exploitation as any other forms of labour , but motherhood as a labour throws significant question on the ethical and social impacts on the surrogates.
Social and Ethical aspects of Surrogacy:-
- The parallels between commercial surrogacy and sex work in the Indian public imagination make surrogacy a highly stigmatized labor option. Although surrogacy as a process is an ethical quagmire in almost all countries, surrogates are not usually stigmatized. In India,however, the surrogates face a high degree of stigma.
- The stigma and secrecy surrounding surrogacy limits the scope of recruitment through word of mouth, and doctors have to rely on formal and informal surrogacy brokers. Former surrogates, women who could not become surrogates for medical reasons, and midwives often become brokers in this trade.
- Also , as explained before, motherhood has a highly emotional attachment to it. To treat it like a business , leaves a wide loop hole as long as the ethical and psychological care is concerned for the surrogates.
- Adoption vs Surrogacy : –
- Adoption has been on the rise when surrogacy was far from reach .However when a couple can have their own baby , with out going through the pain and pleasure of motherhood , surrogacy caught the imagination of many.Especially , the clients are from developed countries, who have enough money to buy the pleasure of having a baby without enduring its pain.
- This has a wrong impact on the adoption itself. Adoption gives a new hope of life to the orphans . But surrogacy has taken over and many orphans who could have otherwise found a better home are now left in the orphanage centers.
Conclusion :- The economic desperation of poor and rural women and low cost reproductive technology , made India a commercial surrogacy hub .Many of the religions does not recognize Adoption itself, to accommodate surrogacy in theology is a distant dream.India , being a highly religious country , the surrogates also encounter religious stigma too.The exploitation are real and its reaches are far and wide.Thus in context the way forward would be :-
Way forward:-
- It is undeniable and probably medically unethical to provide help of surrogacy to the couple who could not conceive child of their own. Thus Surrogacy is going to stay and if we could deal with the economic exploitation and social stigma in a better manner , then this branch of fertility tourism can be of help.
- What makes it unethical is that , those who have the means to afford surrogacy , usually doing it even though they have the biological capacity to reproduce.
- The mother who gives birth is usually highly attached to the child, while the mother as per the contract , does not go through pregnancy , hence largely lacks the emotional attachment with the child .This does not augur well for the child and hence there should a way to find a balance between these two psychological needs, which can only be answered by the people who practice emotional intelligence of higher order and the necessary arrangement has to be made once we acquire the recommendation. Counseling is required for both – the surrogate and the contract mother.
- The exploitation of cheap labour has been the norm in any economic activity. This is very appealing to the foreigners , where they could not find a commercial surrogate at affordable cost at home , they fly to India.The sheer distance keeps the two mothers separate and hence arises the issues of emotional detachment.The only way forward for this issue is , both the surrogate and the contract mother has to be in the same country and in constant touch. While the surrogate endures pain , the contract mother should be there to land a hand aside her bed.
- A robust legal framework is necessary to address all the aspects of this issue – social, legal, economic, emotional , ethical and medical.
- The Government of India can create a cell with in Ministry of External Affair to look after the applications originating from foreign countries.Their merit should be decided by a medical team to check whether the applicant has the ability to reproduce on their own or not. Also , the team should do the necessary check on the couple and the surrogate to see if there is any danger to this arrangement.It also can issue visas , so that the contracting couple can stay with the surrogate during the pregnancy.
- Many lose lives while giving birth due to medical complications, in this case , a willing surrogate should be provided with adequate insurance and her decision should be a conscious one.Also, the surrogate should be provided with enough access to the child after birth so as to fulfill her psychological needs . To this to occur , a holistic approach and guideline has to be developed .
- The compensation and benefits for the surrogate should be taken care of and parity should be maintained . So that the surrogate is not exploited due to economic reasons.
- In the conclusion , surrogacy , indeed is a cobweb and due care has to be taken to frame the law. The Medical association too has to create a ethical guideline for the doctors so that they could restrain from acting as mere contract enforcers while working for the interest of client.
- We are at the cross-roads where our traditional methods of living has constantly challenged by emerging technologies , appropriate action on part of the government at right time can help to realize the goals of all without jeopardizing anybody’s interest.
Receive Daily Updates
Recent Posts
On March 31, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released its annual Gender Gap Report 2021. The Global Gender Gap report is an annual report released by the WEF. The gender gap is the difference between women and men as reflected in social, political, intellectual, cultural, or economic attainments or attitudes. The gap between men and women across health, education, politics, and economics widened for the first time since records began in 2006.
[wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]No need to remember all the data, only pick out few important ones to use in your answers.
The Global gender gap index aims to measure this gap in four key areas : health, education, economics, and politics. It surveys economies to measure gender disparity by collating and analyzing data that fall under four indices : economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment.
The 2021 Global Gender Gap Index benchmarks 156 countries on their progress towards gender parity. The index aims to serve as a compass to track progress on relative gaps between women and men in health, education, economy, and politics.
Although no country has achieved full gender parity, the top two countries (Iceland and Finland) have closed at least 85% of their gap, and the remaining seven countries (Lithuania, Namibia, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Rwanda, and Ireland) have closed at least 80% of their gap. Geographically, the global top 10 continues to be dominated by Nordic countries, with —Iceland, Norway, Finland, and Sweden—in the top five.
The top 10 is completed by one country from Asia Pacific (New Zealand 4th), two Sub-Saharan countries (Namibia, 6th and Rwanda, 7th, one country from Eastern Europe (the new entrant to the top 10, Lithuania, 8th), and another two Western European countries (Ireland, 9th, and Switzerland, 10th, another country in the top-10 for the first time).There is a relatively equitable distribution of available income, resources, and opportunities for men and women in these countries. The tremendous gender gaps are identified primarily in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia.
Here, we can discuss the overall global gender gap scores across the index’s four main components : Economic Participation and Opportunity, Educational Attainment, Health and Survival, and Political Empowerment.
The indicators of the four main components are
(1) Economic Participation and Opportunity:
o Labour force participation rate,
o wage equality for similar work,
o estimated earned income,
o Legislators, senior officials, and managers,
o Professional and technical workers.
(2) Educational Attainment:
o Literacy rate (%)
o Enrollment in primary education (%)
o Enrollment in secondary education (%)
o Enrollment in tertiary education (%).
(3) Health and Survival:
o Sex ratio at birth (%)
o Healthy life expectancy (years).
(4) Political Empowerment:
o Women in Parliament (%)
o Women in Ministerial positions (%)
o Years with a female head of State (last 50 years)
o The share of tenure years.
The objective is to shed light on which factors are driving the overall average decline in the global gender gap score. The analysis results show that this year’s decline is mainly caused by a reversal in performance on the Political Empowerment gap.
Global Trends and Outcomes:
– Globally, this year, i.e., 2021, the average distance completed to gender parity gap is 68% (This means that the remaining gender gap to close stands at 32%) a step back compared to 2020 (-0.6 percentage points). These figures are mainly driven by a decline in the performance of large countries. On its current trajectory, it will now take 135.6 years to close the gender gap worldwide.
– The gender gap in Political Empowerment remains the largest of the four gaps tracked, with only 22% closed to date, having further widened since the 2020 edition of the report by 2.4 percentage points. Across the 156 countries covered by the index, women represent only 26.1% of some 35,500 Parliament seats and 22.6% of over 3,400 Ministers worldwide. In 81 countries, there has never been a woman head of State as of January 15, 2021. At the current rate of progress, the World Economic Forum estimates that it will take 145.5 years to attain gender parity in politics.
– The gender gap in Economic Participation and Opportunity remains the second-largest of the four key gaps tracked by the index. According to this year’s index results, 58% of this gap has been closed so far. The gap has seen marginal improvement since the 2020 edition of the report, and as a result, we estimate that it will take another 267.6 years to close.
– Gender gaps in Educational Attainment and Health and Survival are nearly closed. In Educational Attainment, 95% of this gender gap has been closed globally, with 37 countries already attaining gender parity. However, the ‘last mile’ of progress is proceeding slowly. The index estimates that it will take another 14.2 years to close this gap on its current trajectory completely.
In Health and Survival, 96% of this gender gap has been closed, registering a marginal decline since last year (not due to COVID-19), and the time to close this gap remains undefined. For both education and health, while progress is higher than economy and politics in the global data, there are important future implications of disruptions due to the pandemic and continued variations in quality across income, geography, race, and ethnicity.
India-Specific Findings:
India had slipped 28 spots to rank 140 out of the 156 countries covered. The pandemic causing a disproportionate impact on women jeopardizes rolling back the little progress made in the last decades-forcing more women to drop off the workforce and leaving them vulnerable to domestic violence.
India’s poor performance on the Global Gender Gap report card hints at a serious wake-up call and learning lessons from the Nordic region for the Government and policy makers.
Within the 156 countries covered, women hold only 26 percent of Parliamentary seats and 22 percent of Ministerial positions. India, in some ways, reflects this widening gap, where the number of Ministers declined from 23.1 percent in 2019 to 9.1 percent in 2021. The number of women in Parliament stands low at 14.4 percent. In India, the gender gap has widened to 62.5 %, down from 66.8% the previous year.
It is mainly due to women’s inadequate representation in politics, technical and leadership roles, a decrease in women’s labor force participation rate, poor healthcare, lagging female to male literacy ratio, and income inequality.
The gap is the widest on the political empowerment dimension, with economic participation and opportunity being next in line. However, the gap on educational attainment and health and survival has been practically bridged.
India is the third-worst performer among South Asian countries, with Pakistan and Afghanistan trailing and Bangladesh being at the top. The report states that the country fared the worst in political empowerment, regressing from 23.9% to 9.1%.
Its ranking on the health and survival dimension is among the five worst performers. The economic participation and opportunity gap saw a decline of 3% compared to 2020, while India’s educational attainment front is in the 114th position.
India has deteriorated to 51st place from 18th place in 2020 on political empowerment. Still, it has slipped to 155th position from 150th position in 2020 on health and survival, 151st place in economic participation and opportunity from 149th place, and 114th place for educational attainment from 112th.
In 2020 reports, among the 153 countries studied, India is the only country where the economic gender gap of 64.6% is larger than the political gender gap of 58.9%. In 2021 report, among the 156 countries, the economic gender gap of India is 67.4%, 3.8% gender gap in education, 6.3% gap in health and survival, and 72.4% gender gap in political empowerment. In health and survival, the gender gap of the sex ratio at birth is above 9.1%, and healthy life expectancy is almost the same.
Discrimination against women has also been reflected in Health and Survival subindex statistics. With 93.7% of this gap closed to date, India ranks among the bottom five countries in this subindex. The wide sex ratio at birth gaps is due to the high incidence of gender-based sex-selective practices. Besides, more than one in four women has faced intimate violence in her lifetime.The gender gap in the literacy rate is above 20.1%.
Yet, gender gaps persist in literacy : one-third of women are illiterate (34.2%) than 17.6% of men. In political empowerment, globally, women in Parliament is at 128th position and gender gap of 83.2%, and 90% gap in a Ministerial position. The gap in wages equality for similar work is above 51.8%. On health and survival, four large countries Pakistan, India, Vietnam, and China, fare poorly, with millions of women there not getting the same access to health as men.
The pandemic has only slowed down in its tracks the progress India was making towards achieving gender parity. The country urgently needs to focus on “health and survival,” which points towards a skewed sex ratio because of the high incidence of gender-based sex-selective practices and women’s economic participation. Women’s labour force participation rate and the share of women in technical roles declined in 2020, reducing the estimated earned income of women, one-fifth of men.
Learning from the Nordic region, noteworthy participation of women in politics, institutions, and public life is the catalyst for transformational change. Women need to be equal participants in the labour force to pioneer the societal changes the world needs in this integral period of transition.
Every effort must be directed towards achieving gender parallelism by facilitating women in leadership and decision-making positions. Social protection programmes should be gender-responsive and account for the differential needs of women and girls. Research and scientific literature also provide unequivocal evidence that countries led by women are dealing with the pandemic more effectively than many others.
Gendered inequality, thereby, is a global concern. India should focus on targeted policies and earmarked public and private investments in care and equalized access. Women are not ready to wait for another century for equality. It’s time India accelerates its efforts and fight for an inclusive, equal, global recovery.
India will not fully develop unless both women and men are equally supported to reach their full potential. There are risks, violations, and vulnerabilities women face just because they are women. Most of these risks are directly linked to women’s economic, political, social, and cultural disadvantages in their daily lives. It becomes acute during crises and disasters.
With the prevalence of gender discrimination, and social norms and practices, women become exposed to the possibility of child marriage, teenage pregnancy, child domestic work, poor education and health, sexual abuse, exploitation, and violence. Many of these manifestations will not change unless women are valued more.
[wptelegram-join-channel link=”https://t.me/s/upsctree” text=”Join @upsctree on Telegram”]2021 WEF Global Gender Gap report, which confirmed its 2016 finding of a decline in worldwide progress towards gender parity.
Over 2.8 billion women are legally restricted from having the same choice of jobs as men. As many as 104 countries still have laws preventing women from working in specific jobs, 59 countries have no laws on sexual harassment in the workplace, and it is astonishing that a handful of countries still allow husbands to legally stop their wives from working.
Globally, women’s participation in the labour force is estimated at 63% (as against 94% of men who participate), but India’s is at a dismal 25% or so currently. Most women are in informal and vulnerable employment—domestic help, agriculture, etc—and are always paid less than men.
Recent reports from Assam suggest that women workers in plantations are paid much less than men and never promoted to supervisory roles. The gender wage gap is about 24% globally, and women have lost far more jobs than men during lockdowns.
The problem of gender disparity is compounded by hurdles put up by governments, society and businesses: unequal access to social security schemes, banking services, education, digital services and so on, even as a glass ceiling has kept leadership roles out of women’s reach.
Yes, many governments and businesses had been working on parity before the pandemic struck. But the global gender gap, defined by differences reflected in the social, political, intellectual, cultural and economic attainments or attitudes of men and women, will not narrow in the near future without all major stakeholders working together on a clear agenda—that of economic growth by inclusion.
The WEF report estimates 135 years to close the gap at our current rate of progress based on four pillars: educational attainment, health, economic participation and political empowerment.
India has slipped from rank 112 to 140 in a single year, confirming how hard women were hit by the pandemic. Pakistan and Afghanistan are the only two Asian countries that fared worse.
Here are a few things we must do:
One, frame policies for equal-opportunity employment. Use technology and artificial intelligence to eliminate biases of gender, caste, etc, and select candidates at all levels on merit. Numerous surveys indicate that women in general have a better chance of landing jobs if their gender is not known to recruiters.
Two, foster a culture of gender sensitivity. Take a review of current policies and move from gender-neutral to gender-sensitive. Encourage and insist on diversity and inclusion at all levels, and promote more women internally to leadership roles. Demolish silos to let women grab potential opportunities in hitherto male-dominant roles. Work-from-home has taught us how efficiently women can manage flex-timings and productivity.
Three, deploy corporate social responsibility (CSR) funds for the education and skilling of women and girls at the bottom of the pyramid. CSR allocations to toilet building, the PM-Cares fund and firms’ own trusts could be re-channelled for this.
Four, get more women into research and development (R&D) roles. A study of over 4,000 companies found that more women in R&D jobs resulted in radical innovation. It appears women score far higher than men in championing change. If you seek growth from affordable products and services for low-income groups, women often have the best ideas.
Five, break barriers to allow progress. Cultural and structural issues must be fixed. Unconscious biases and discrimination are rampant even in highly-esteemed organizations. Establish fair and transparent human resource policies.
Six, get involved in local communities to engage them. As Michael Porter said, it is not possible for businesses to sustain long-term shareholder value without ensuring the welfare of the communities they exist in. It is in the best interest of enterprises to engage with local communities to understand and work towards lowering cultural and other barriers in society. It will also help connect with potential customers, employees and special interest groups driving the gender-equity agenda and achieve better diversity.