The age of oil is far from over, in spite of the global urgency to curb carbon emissions, the ‘plus’ avatar of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) has regained unity as a cartel, and, as global crude nears $80 per barrel, it is clearly time for India to ease domestic levies on fuel.
- The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a permanent, intergovernmental organization, created at the Baghdad Conference in 1960, by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela.
- It is headquartered in Vienna, Austria.
- However, currently, the Organization has a total of 13 member countries only after Ecuador, Indonesia, Qatar and Gabon suspended it.
- The non-OPEC countries which export crude oil are termed as OPEC Plus countries. OPEC Plus countries include
- Azerbaijan
- Bahrain
- Brunei
- Kazakhstan
- Malaysia
- Mexico
- Oman
- Russia
- South Sudan
- Sudan
Our policy since the oil-price slide of 2014 has been to keep retail prices high and mop up the external windfall of lower import bills through taxes, but without offering relief when costs rise instead.
Apart from its heavy burden on fuel-users, this approach stokes inflation and makes it harder for our central bank to fulfil its mandate of price-stability.
It may still have been bearable if dearer oil were just a blip, but two widely-assumed factors of price moderation need interrogation.
First, can clean energy reduce oil demand enough to make a difference?
Second, to what extent has shale supply from US frackers loosened Opec+’s grip on the global market for oil?
With Saudi Arabia’s row with Russia that coincided with last year’s covid crash now well in the past, an Opec+ huddle is expected to take a call on a speedier revival in combined output than its current schedule of 400,000 daily barrels every month, as post covid combustion resumes.
By Opec’s latest forecast, the world’s oil market will regain its pre-covid volume of some 100 million barrels per day by 2023 and then expand to plateau at almost 108 million by 2035.
An economic slump in fuel-guzzler China could get in the way of that, but the cartel’s new projection of renewables making up less than a tenth of global energy use by then does look credible, given our slow progress against climate change that prompted Riyadh’s recent dismissal of a net-zero emission target by 2050 as a “La La Land” fantasy.
If Opec is confident of taking its share from a third of today’s market to 39% by 2045, attribute it to cost dynamics. This also explains why Saudi sway over prices persists in the face of America’s shale-oil gush.
Once US drillers began using advanced tools to fracture rocks and crack open elusive reserves about a decade ago, dozens of new frackers turned America into the world’s biggest oil producer.
Its 10.6 million daily barrels last month exceeded Saudi and Russian output by about 1 million each. But shale producers are estimated to break even at $40-45 a barrel, while Arabian desert oil costs less than a tenth to extract, with fixed assets long defrayed.
This lets Riyadh open and close its taps of supply at will, even if just to squeeze out high-cost rivals via a glut of cheap oil, as seen in the 1980s.
The past decade’s episode left US frackers battered, though with survivors far more efficient, and Opec with renewed power over international prices.
On balance, while oil’s $147-per-barrel peak of 2007 may not be hit again, it could yet stay at elevated levels set by Opec+.
The past decade saw data replace oil as the top source of monopoly profits and frackers relieve the US of its energy anxiety. With its economy better able to absorb oil shocks, like the stagflationary spike of the 1970s (and even slower upshoots, as seen in the 2000s), the US recently pivoted its geo-strategic focus from West to East Asia.
Momentous as this is, the economies of big importers like India remain vulnerable. Our post-independence tryst with self-reliance was taken apart by oil needs. And our import-dependency remains high. We can’t count on cheap oil. We have to slash fuel taxes.
Recent Posts
Petrol in India is cheaper than in countries like Hong Kong, Germany and the UK but costlier than in China, Brazil, Japan, the US, Russia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, a Bank of Baroda Economics Research report showed.
Rising fuel prices in India have led to considerable debate on which government, state or central, should be lowering their taxes to keep prices under control.
The rise in fuel prices is mainly due to the global price of crude oil (raw material for making petrol and diesel) going up. Further, a stronger dollar has added to the cost of crude oil.
Amongst comparable countries (per capita wise), prices in India are higher than those in Vietnam, Kenya, Ukraine, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Venezuela. Countries that are major oil producers have much lower prices.
In the report, the Philippines has a comparable petrol price but has a per capita income higher than India by over 50 per cent.
Countries which have a lower per capita income like Kenya, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Venezuela have much lower prices of petrol and hence are impacted less than India.
“Therefore there is still a strong case for the government to consider lowering the taxes on fuel to protect the interest of the people,” the report argued.
India is the world’s third-biggest oil consuming and importing nation. It imports 85 per cent of its oil needs and so prices retail fuel at import parity rates.
With the global surge in energy prices, the cost of producing petrol, diesel and other petroleum products also went up for oil companies in India.
They raised petrol and diesel prices by Rs 10 a litre in just over a fortnight beginning March 22 but hit a pause button soon after as the move faced criticism and the opposition parties asked the government to cut taxes instead.
India imports most of its oil from a group of countries called the ‘OPEC +’ (i.e, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Russia, etc), which produces 40% of the world’s crude oil.
As they have the power to dictate fuel supply and prices, their decision of limiting the global supply reduces supply in India, thus raising prices
The government charges about 167% tax (excise) on petrol and 129% on diesel as compared to US (20%), UK (62%), Italy and Germany (65%).
The abominable excise duty is 2/3rd of the cost, and the base price, dealer commission and freight form the rest.
Here is an approximate break-up (in Rs):
a)Base Price | 39 |
b)Freight | 0.34 |
c) Price Charged to Dealers = (a+b) | 39.34 |
d) Excise Duty | 40.17 |
e) Dealer Commission | 4.68 |
f) VAT | 25.35 |
g) Retail Selling Price | 109.54 |
Looked closely, much of the cost of petrol and diesel is due to higher tax rate by govt, specifically excise duty.
So the question is why government is not reducing the prices ?
India, being a developing country, it does require gigantic amount of funding for its infrastructure projects as well as welfare schemes.
However, we as a society is yet to be tax-compliant. Many people evade the direct tax and that’s the reason why govt’s hands are tied. Govt. needs the money to fund various programs and at the same time it is not generating enough revenue from direct taxes.
That’s the reason why, govt is bumping up its revenue through higher indirect taxes such as GST or excise duty as in the case of petrol and diesel.
Direct taxes are progressive as it taxes according to an individuals’ income however indirect tax such as excise duty or GST are regressive in the sense that the poorest of the poor and richest of the rich have to pay the same amount.
Does not matter, if you are an auto-driver or owner of a Mercedes, end of the day both pay the same price for petrol/diesel-that’s why it is regressive in nature.
But unlike direct tax where tax evasion is rampant, indirect tax can not be evaded due to their very nature and as long as huge no of Indians keep evading direct taxes, indirect tax such as excise duty will be difficult for the govt to reduce, because it may reduce the revenue and hamper may programs of the govt.