Bioethics & Social Ethics
Simplified, exam-ready notes on five major applied-ethics themes: Suicide, Euthanasia, Abortion, Violence, and Terrorism — covering meanings, philosophical and religious perspectives, laws, causes, consequences, and ways forward, with quotes, tables, and diagrams for quick revision.
Suicide
This unit looks at the meaning and moral status of suicide through the eyes of major Western philosophers — Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, Augustine, Aquinas, Donne, Hume, and Kant — and then through the lens of five world religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Islam, and Christianity.
1.1–1.2 Introduction & Definition
The word suicide comes from the Latin suicidium — sui (self) + cide (kill). It means "an intentional act of self-killing" — a person directly, knowingly, and freely bringing about their own death.
- Direct suicide — death is desired for its own sake, or used as a means to an end (e.g. to escape persecution).
- Indirect suicide and deaths of persons in a state of mental abnormality are not the unit's focus — such people may not be fully responsible for their act.
- Risking one's life for a greater good (soldiers, police, firefighters, doctors) is different from suicide — the person does not desire death but accepts risk in service of others.
Suicides are of two types:
- Conventional suicide — driven by tradition and public opinion (e.g. sati, the historical practice of a widow immolating herself on her husband's funeral pyre in India).
- Personal suicide — an individual's own choice, not demanded by custom.
Suicide simply means a person knowingly and freely ending their own life. It is different from someone accepting danger for a noble cause (like a soldier or doctor), and different again from a death caused while a person is not in control of their mind.
1.3 Philosophical Views on Suicide
Plato (427–347 B.C.)
In the Phaedo, Plato has Socrates explain the Pythagorean ban on suicide: life is not ours to dispose of because we are placed here like soldiers at a "guard post" by the gods — we are their possessions. Suicide is a grave offence against the political community and against the wishes of the gods.
Aristotle (384–322 B.C.)
Aristotle supports Plato's condemnation: suicide is an injustice against the political community, whose existence is essential to one's own well-being (Nicomachean Ethics).
The Stoics
Unlike Plato and Aristotle, the Stoics justified suicide. Their materialistic, deterministic philosophy left no room for personal immortality — so ending one's life, when reasonable, was not seen as wrong.
Augustine (354–420)
Augustine builds the "base-line" Christian case against suicide, weaving pagan and scriptural sources together. He treats every suicide as an objective murder. There is no pretext — not even avoiding sin, or preserving virtue — that can justify it.
He does concede a puzzling exception: holy women who threw themselves into rivers to escape violation were honoured by the Church — but only if they acted under some extraordinary divine inspiration, a possibility he treats with great caution.
Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274)
Aquinas systematises Augustine's case into three arguments, all still drawing on Aristotle:
| Duty Violated | Aquinas's Reasoning |
|---|---|
| Duty to Self | Every being naturally seeks self-preservation; suicide breaches the charity we owe ourselves. |
| Duty to Community | Each person is "part of the whole" (the political community); suicide robs the community of one of its members. |
| Duty to God | Life is God's gift (Deuteronomy 32:39 — only God has power over life and death); suicide usurps God's judgment. |
Aquinas also rejects sentimental motives for suicide (escaping sorrow, atoning for a crime, or fear of committing a future crime), and denies it can ever be an act of real courage — every suicide, he says, is really a weakening of the will that gives way before life's difficulties.
John Donne (1572–1631)
In Biathanatos, Donne breaks from the Augustine–Aquinas tradition. He argues in three parts — Law of Nature, Law of Reason, Law of God — that:
- Just as some things "naturally" preserve themselves, some people may naturally yearn for death — intention matters more than a blanket rule.
- A hypothetical harm to society is not sufficient reason to call every suicide immoral.
- Scripture never explicitly condemns suicide — only God, who alone knows the heart, can judge its morality (as with martyrdom, or dying for others' welfare).
Donne, however, gives no general license to suicide — he only argues that motive must be examined case by case.
David Hume (1711–1776)
Hume revives a Stoic-like, utilitarian position: when persistent grave misfortune (especially ill health) robs life of enjoyment, death by one's own hand can be a reasonable, welcome alternative. He rejects the idea that suicide "disturbs the order of the universe" or offends God's ownership of our lives — reducing that argument to treating life like mere property.
Immanuel Kant (1729–1804)
Kant uses suicide to illustrate the categorical imperative. A man in despair who wants to end his life "out of self-love" cannot rationally do so — because self-love, by definition, presupposes the actor's continued existence. Destroying oneself would contradict the very basis of the maxim used to justify it.
Kant's conclusion echoes Plato and the Christian tradition, though reached differently: God is our owner; we are his property; suicide violates an obligation to God.
| Thinker | Position |
|---|---|
| Plato | Condemns — life belongs to the gods |
| Aristotle | Condemns — injustice to the community |
| Stoics | Justify — death can be a reasonable choice |
| Augustine | Condemns absolutely — every suicide is murder |
| Aquinas | Condemns — violates duty to self, community, and God |
| Donne | Motive-dependent — no blanket condemnation, but no license either |
| Hume | Justifies in cases of unbearable, incurable suffering |
| Kant | Condemns — self-contradictory and destroys the ground of morality |
1.4 Religious Views on Suicide
From the religious point of view, suicide has generally been regarded as a crime and a violation of social order.
Almost every religion treats ordinary suicide as wrong because life is seen as something given — by God, by nature, or by karma — not something we fully own. A few traditions (Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism) carve out narrow, strictly-regulated exceptions for religious renunciation, but none of them casually endorse suicide.
- Suicide = the intentional, free act of ending one's own life; distinct from risking life for others or from acts done under mental incapacity.
- Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, Kant — condemn suicide (life belongs to the gods/God/community, not the individual).
- Stoics and Hume — justify suicide in cases of unbearable, hopeless suffering.
- Donne — argues the morality of suicide depends on the actor's motive, which only God can fully judge.
- All five major religions studied (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Islam, Christianity) treat ordinary suicide as wrong, though a few permit narrowly-defined religious exceptions.
Euthanasia
This unit examines euthanasia ("mercy killing") — its meaning, history, global practice, the argument that it "devalues human life," the case for palliative care and pain management, real case studies that changed doctors' minds, and the philosophical debate around "quality of life."
2.1–2.2 Meaning & History
Euthanasia comes from the Greek eu (good) + thanatos (death). It means the intentional killing, by act or omission, of a person whose life is felt — by themselves or others — not to be worth living.
| Type | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Direct / Active Euthanasia | Killing a patient by direct means (e.g. lethal injection) — an act of commission |
| Indirect / Passive Euthanasia | Killing by withholding or withdrawing treatment (e.g. stopping antibiotics) — an act of omission |
| Physician-Assisted Suicide | A doctor supplies the means for a patient to end their own life |
| Inertia Killing | Doctors do nothing for an unconscious patient without confirming diagnosis, leaving them to die |
The unit also links the history of euthanasia to eugenics and Social Darwinism — the idea that "the duty of the strong is to destroy the weak" to assist human progress — and cites the 1939 German experiment in which four cooperative, non-disruptive mental patients were killed with carbon monoxide gas, a "successful" case after which gas chambers were installed in six psychiatric hospitals.
2.3 Euthanasia Around the World
The Holland (Netherlands) Experience
Despite written guidelines requiring that a euthanasia request be "entirely free and voluntary," the unit reports:
- A shift from voluntary euthanasia for the terminally ill to euthanasia for the chronically ill, psychiatric patients, and even involuntary euthanasia.
- Patients afraid to be admitted to hospital for fear of being killed; a documented case where a stable cancer patient was euthanised over a weekend simply because a bed was needed.
- Elderly citizens reportedly made to feel it is "their duty to die" so as not to be a financial burden.
UK, USA, Australia
Voluntary Euthanasia Bills reached the British Parliament from 1969. In the US, attempts to legalise direct euthanasia in California, Oregon, and Washington failed; the debate shifted to "physician-assisted suicide." Jack Kevorkian ("Dr Death"), a Michigan pathologist, was convicted of second-degree murder after directly killing a patient with Lou Gehrig's disease, having by his own estimate participated in about 130 deaths.
Euthanasia in India
Euthanasia is not legalised in India, though covert practice occurs; bills in Maharashtra and Kerala have been introduced but not passed. A 1991 survey by statistician Dr Malini Karkal found euthanasia rejected by a large majority across religions:
| Religious Group | % Rejecting Euthanasia |
|---|---|
| Hindus | 93% |
| Muslims | 92% |
| Christians | 97% |
| Jains & Buddhists | 100% |
2.4–2.8 Devaluing Life, Dignity, Pain & Spirit
The unit argues euthanasia is not a purely private decision: helping one person die makes it easier to consider killing the ill, weak, elderly, and unwanted — desensitising family, friends, and healthcare providers, and creating pressure for "population control of the financially unproductive."
This story is used to argue that dignity is internal, not external — it does not depend on bodily control or independence, but on being loved, respected, and cared for until natural death.
Eustress (constructive/positive stress) is proposed as an alternative response — helping patients, families, and physicians transform the stress of suffering into strengthened caring and peace-making, rather than resorting to death as a solution.
The unit's central claim is this: pain can almost always be managed medically, but euthanasia treats a person's life as the problem to be solved rather than their pain. Real compassion, on this view, means better pain relief, emotional support, and presence — not ending the life.
2.9 Case Studies — Doctors Who Changed Their Minds
| Case | What Happened |
|---|---|
| Winston Churchill | Doctors said nothing more could be done for his pneumonia — but a newly-developed drug, penicillin, was flown in and he recovered fully. |
| Dr Hingorani (eminent surgeon) | Was about to grant a "mercy" injection request from two sons for their dying father — until a relative revealed the sons stood to gain financially. He changed his pro-euthanasia stance. |
| Dr Christian Barnard (heart surgeon) | As a young intern, came within a needle's plunge of a mercy killing for a woman in agony — was called away, she recovered and lived three more "good years." |
| Dr Lusito deSouza (Tata Cancer Hospital) | A woman told 15 years earlier she had "incurable" cancer returned alive and well with her grown son — the earlier diagnosis had been wrong. |
2.10–2.11 Palliative Care & the Quality-of-Life Debate
The unit notes it is "little known" that depression and suicide have little or no place in the lives of the simple and physically impaired — with the highest rates instead found among pop stars and the wealthy, suggesting quality of life is not simply about physical capacity.
On the "quality-of-life" argument (used to justify euthanasia in incurable or severely disabled cases): the unit is critical. A proxy decision-maker's judgment that "no reasonable person would prefer this life to death" is questioned — because someone who has never experienced a particular capacity cannot be assumed to suffer its loss the way someone who once had it would; and because proxies (parents, physicians) may have interests of their own that colour the judgment.
- What is mercy killing, and how does it differ from palliative care?
- What does the Holland experience reveal about the risks of legalised euthanasia?
- Why does the unit argue that dignity is "internal, not external"?
- What is the "quality-of-life" argument, and what objection is raised against it?
- Euthanasia = intentional killing (act or omission) of a patient whose life is felt not to be worth living; distinguished from stopping futile treatment.
- The Hippocratic Oath's "first, do no harm" is the ethical baseline the unit says euthanasia departs from.
- The Netherlands is used as a cautionary case: voluntary euthanasia expanded over decades into involuntary practice and loss of patient autonomy.
- India's MTP-style survey data shows overwhelming public and religious rejection of euthanasia (92–100% across groups).
- 95% of cancer pain is medically controllable — palliative care and pain management are presented as the ethical alternative to euthanasia.
- Several real doctors changed their pro-euthanasia views after direct clinical experience (Hingorani, Barnard, deSouza).
- Euthanasia ≠ withdrawing futile treatment; it specifically means purposeful killing.
Abortion
This unit covers the concept and meaning of abortion, its types and methods, medical and psychological risks, the debated link to breast cancer, and the legal framework — including India's Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971.
3.2 Concept, Meaning & Types
Abortion comes from Latin ab (off/away) + oriri (to be born) — taking away a life that would otherwise be born. Medically, it is the termination of pregnancy by removal of the fetus/embryo from the uterus.
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Spontaneous Abortion | Occurs naturally, without intervention (a "miscarriage") |
| Induced Abortion | Deliberately brought about |
| Therapeutic Abortion | Induced to preserve the mother's life/health |
| Elective Abortion | Induced for reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease |
| Threatened Abortion | Process has started but can still be reversed |
| Inevitable Abortion | Changes have progressed too far for the pregnancy to continue |
| Complete / Incomplete Abortion | Whether all or only part of the uterine contents are expelled |
| Sex-Selective Abortion | Termination based on the fetus's sex, enabled by sonography/amniocentesis |
- To save the life of the pregnant woman
- To preserve her physical or mental health
- Where the child would be born with a fatal or seriously morbid congenital disorder
- To selectively reduce fetus number in multiple pregnancy, lowering health risk
3.3 Methods of Abortion (Overview)
Methods vary mainly by duration of pregnancy. Early abortion is before the 12th week; late abortion falls between the 12th and 20th week.
- Manual Vacuum Aspiration — used up to about 7 weeks; the embryo is suctioned out through a thin tube.
- Suction Curettage — the most common surgical method; the cervix is opened and a suction machine and/or curette remove the fetus.
- Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) — used in the second trimester; the cervix is opened wider and forceps are used.
- Dilation and Extraction (D&X) — a multi-day procedure for later pregnancies.
- RU486 / Mifepristone (the "abortion pill") — used up to the 49th day after the last menstrual period; not effective for ectopic pregnancy.
- Salt Poisoning — a strong saline solution injected into the amniotic sac; historically developed in Nazi concentration camps.
- Hysterotomy — an "early caesarean," used late in pregnancy.
- Unsafe/self-induced methods — misuse of misoprostol, or insertion of implements such as knitting needles — associated with serious complications where legal, safe abortion is unavailable.
The method used depends heavily on how far along the pregnancy is — early pregnancies can be ended with pills or simple suction, while later pregnancies require more invasive surgical procedures with greater medical risk.
3.4 Risks Involved in Abortion
| Category | Possible Complication |
|---|---|
| Physical — Immediate | Heavy bleeding/hemorrhage, infection, incomplete abortion, anesthesia complications, cervical damage, uterine perforation, damage to nearby organs, and in extreme cases, death |
| Physical — Long-Term | Scarring of the uterine lining, placenta previa in later pregnancies, pre-term birth/low birth weight in subsequent children, sterility |
| Psychological | Eating disorders, relationship problems, guilt, depression, flashbacks, suicidal thoughts, sexual dysfunction, substance abuse — described as a form of post-traumatic stress |
| Maternal Mortality | Higher for illegal/unsafe abortions, and disproportionately affects poorer and less-educated women in countries with restrictive laws |
The unit reports a study finding psychiatric admission after suicide attempts to be three times more likely for women following induced abortion compared to those who carried a pregnancy to term.
3.5 The Abortion–Breast Cancer (ABC) Link
The unit presents the argument (from Angela Lanfranchi's work) that breast tissue matures fully only through a full-term (40-week) pregnancy. If abortion interrupts this before full maturation, a woman is left with a greater proportion of immature Type 1 and Type 2 breast lobules — the type from which most (ductal) breast cancers are said to arise.
Higher Risk Cited When...
- Abortion precedes a first full-term pregnancy
- The woman is a teenager, or over 30
- Pregnancy is terminated after 12 weeks
Additional Risk Factor
- Family history of breast cancer
- Early menstrual onset continuing into late fifties (long estrogen exposure)
- Use of birth-control pills
3.6 Legalising Abortion — India's MTP Act, 1971
The Soviet Union was the first country to legalise abortion (1920, under Lenin). India's Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971 permits abortion up to 20 weeks without spousal consent, under five grounds:
- Only a registered medical practitioner experienced in gynaecology/obstetrics may perform an abortion where pregnancy is under 12 weeks.
- Abortion may only be performed at a government-approved hospital or licensed facility (non-governmental institutions may obtain a license from the Chief Medical Officer).
- Written guardian consent is required for women under 18, and for those with a mental illness even if over 18.
Issues Associated with Legal Abortion
| Issue | Key Point |
|---|---|
| Physical/Medical | A woman's body is physiologically prepared for motherhood; sudden interruption can shock the system, physically and mentally. |
| Emotional | Reactions range widely — relief for some, deep distress for others, especially if the decision was coerced or against the woman's own judgment. |
| Social | Legalisation reduces deaths from illegal/unsafe abortion, but critics argue it can normalise an "abortion mentality." |
| Moral | Centres on whether the unborn child has a claim to legal protection of life, as the UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child affirms "before as well as after birth." |
India's abortion law is unusually broad because the "contraceptive failure" ground effectively allows abortion on request within the first 20 weeks for married women. The debate around abortion is really several overlapping debates — medical safety, mental health, social pressure (like son-preference), and the moral status of the unborn — not just one single question.
- List the circumstances that justify a therapeutic abortion.
- Name the different types of abortion described in the unit.
- State the five conditions under which pregnancy can be terminated under the MTP Act, 1971.
- Abortion = deliberate termination of pregnancy; distinguished from spontaneous miscarriage.
- Methods range from early medical options (RU486) to later surgical procedures (D&E, D&X, hysterotomy) — risk generally rises with gestational age.
- Risks include physical complications (hemorrhage, infection, infertility) and psychological effects (guilt, depression, PTSD-like symptoms).
- The unit presents a contested abortion–breast cancer (ABC) link tied to immature breast lobule development.
- India's MTP Act, 1971 permits abortion up to 20 weeks on medical, eugenic, humanitarian, socio-economic, or contraceptive-failure grounds — the last being a distinctively broad Indian provision.
Violence
This unit surveys the nature, kinds, and causes of violence that threaten life across society — from domestic and gender violence to gang, political, religious, and terrorist violence — and proposes practical ways to reduce it.
4.2 Nature of Violence
The word violence comes from Latin violentia, rooted in vis ("force"). It denotes great or excessive force, or constraint. Violence is, first, the exercise of physical force to damage persons or property — but more importantly, the forcible interference with personal freedom.
4.3 Kinds of Violence
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Domestic / Family Violence | Wife-beating, child punishment, sibling conflict, marital rape, elder abuse; often transmitted across generations via learned behaviour |
| Verbal Violence | Abusive, loud, or filthy language used to dominate — found in family, workplace, and public life |
| Psychological Violence | Blackmail, reputation damage, fear-based pressure — considered more harmful than physical violence, can cause depression and even psychosis |
| Sexual Violence | Exerting force to compel unwanted sexual activity; women and children most vulnerable |
| Gang Violence | Rival groups competing for dominance, fuelled by unemployment and misguided youth aspirations |
| Child Abuse | Child labour, household/agricultural/construction exploitation, and worst of all, sexual exploitation |
| Gender Violence | Discrimination, unequal pay, dress codes, and enforced submission rooted in patriarchal attitudes |
| Political Violence | Use of unlawful force for political ends — from stone-throwing to revolution and civil war |
| Cultural Violence | Societies whose core values/beliefs normalise aggression across interpersonal life, child-rearing, and even sport |
| Religious Violence | Extreme fasting, self-mortification, and conflicts arising "in the name of" religion, often exploited by those in power |
| Fundamentalism | A fascist-like religious fervour enforcing extreme austerity and punishment, destroying inner peace |
| Terrorism | Political killing/low-level warfare targeting harmless civilians (elaborated fully in Unit 5) |
Violence is not just hitting someone. It includes anything that forcibly overrides a person's freedom or dignity — shouting someone down, blackmailing them, discriminating against them, or forcing an ideology on them are all forms of violence, even without a single physical blow.
4.4 Causes of Violence
The unit traces violence to a wide web of interconnected causes:
Economic & Social Causes
- Consumerism — equating happiness with buying; breeds selfishness, imbalance, and even suicide when income can't match desire
- Economic exploitation — unequal wealth distribution (e.g. French Revolution)
- Unemployment — crushes dignity, drives anti-social behaviour
- Caste system — historical division enforced with violence against the "lower" castes
- Capitalism — "survival of the fittest" competition that treats people as commodities
Institutional & Personal Causes
- Poor governance & corruption — breeds violent revolt over unequal opportunity
- Lack of education — makes people easy to manipulate into fighting for unfounded causes
- Moral laxity — erodes respect for life itself
- Biased media / false propaganda — incites mobs and provides cover for those "in power"
- Family breakdown & peer pressure — children become witnesses/victims, later repeating violence
- Frustration & lack of tolerance — unemployment and impatience push people toward destructive outlets
4.5 Proposals to Overcome Violence
- What is violence, according to its Latin root and definition in the unit?
- Which type of violence is described as the "weapon of the strong to subdue the weak"?
- How does consumerism specifically affect youth and children?
- List the five proposals to overcome violence.
- Violence = force or constraint that damages persons/property or forcibly interferes with personal freedom.
- Kinds range from domestic and verbal to psychological, sexual, gang, gender, political, cultural, religious, and terrorist violence.
- Root causes include consumerism, economic exploitation, unemployment, caste, corruption, lack of education, media influence, and family breakdown.
- Solutions proposed: stable family life, value-based education, pro-life culture, good governance, religious tolerance, and Ahimsa (Gandhian non-violence).
Terrorism
This unit reviews terrorism's origin and definition, historical evolution, causes, consequences, and its relationship to social ethics — closing with Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence as a moral response.
5.2 Origin & Definition
The term comes from the French terrorisme, based on a Latin verb referring to violence or the threat of imminent violence. British statesman Edmund Burke first used the concept in the context of the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution, when terror was seen as a tool of dictatorship and a symbol of power.
| Source | Definition |
|---|---|
| Oxford Advanced Dictionary | The use of violent action to achieve political aims or force a government to act |
| Encyclopedia Britannica | The systematic use of terror or unpredictable violence against governments, public, or individuals to attain a political objective |
| Encyclopedia of Social Sciences | A method whereby an organized group/party seeks to achieve its aims chiefly through the systematic use of violence |
Common methods: hostage-taking, hijacking, political assassination, kidnapping, bombing, and explosions. Objectives include publicising a cause, mobilising sympathisers, eliminating opponents, demonstrating government weakness, and instilling fear.
5.3 History of Terrorism
- Ancient World: The Zealots (Sicarii, "dagger-men") resisted Roman rule in Judaea — considered the first recorded terrorist movement.
- Middle Ages: The French Revolution's Committee of Public Safety killed over 17,000 people; its agents were the first to be called "Terrorists" — the origin of the word.
- Modern Era (19th century): Anarchists in Europe/Russia assassinated kings, presidents, and prime ministers, believing this was the fastest route to political change.
- Contemporary Era: A shift from targeting powerful figures to targeting innocent civilians — examples cited include the Tamil Tigers, Sikh/Kashmiri militancy in India, Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the IRA. Today's terrorists are described as "techno-savvy," using chemical, biological, nuclear, and modern communication tools.
5.4 Causes of Terrorism
| Cause | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Persistent Disputes | Conflicts over territory, freedom from foreign rule, imposed government forms, economic deprivation, or perceived injustice |
| Lack of Redressal | Where legal/institutional remedies are absent, slow, or corrupt, aggrieved groups seek solutions themselves |
| Weakness of Distressed People | Those unable to face oppressors directly go underground instead |
| Misguidance | Children/youth indoctrinated with hatred in the name of religion, ethnicity, or nationalism; taught to see death/destruction as "heroic martyrdom" |
| Mass Media | Wide, sometimes live, coverage can become an "unwilling ally," amplifying fear and motivating further attacks |
| Democratic Openness | Civil liberties and limited surveillance in democracies can, paradoxically, be exploited by terrorists more easily than in repressive states |
| Globalization | Linked communication/financial systems (internet, satellite phones) help terrorist networks organize and fund themselves |
| Psychological Factors | Terrorists may be otherwise "normal" individuals driven by deep emotional need, nationalism/religious motivation, or a desire to escape loneliness through group belonging |
5.5 Consequences of Terrorism
Political terrorism is described as "the result of a conscious decision by ideologically inspired groups to strike back at what their members may perceive as unjust." The 9/11 attacks (2001) are cited as an example of economic consequences rippling through the global economy.
5.6 Terrorism and Social Ethics
The unit distinguishes two major ethical traditions relevant here:
| Tradition | Core Idea |
|---|---|
| Absolutist Theories | Certain moral duties are obligatory in nature, regardless of outcome — some rules should never be broken |
| Utilitarian Suppositions | Behaviour is right if it maximizes overall welfare/happiness — even if this comes at a minority's expense |
Mahatma Gandhi and Non-Violence
The unit presents Gandhi as the most significant universal pacifist of the twentieth century, who led a largely bloodless freedom struggle grounded in truth and non-violence — Sarvodaya ("welfare of all").
Inter-Human Relationship
- Built on love and respect between people
- Guides how we treat others as persons, not means
Intra-Human Relationship
- Centred on the sacredness of one's own life and that of others
- Never permits becoming a suicide-bomber or destroying oneself and others
Whatever cause a group claims to fight for, deliberately targeting innocent civilians can never be ethically justified — because it destroys the very right to life that any political or social claim ultimately depends on. Gandhi's answer was not silence in the face of injustice, but a disciplined, loving non-violence that refuses to dehumanise even one's opponent.
- What is the origin of the word "terrorism," and how do standard dictionaries define it?
- Briefly trace the historical evolution of terrorism from ancient to contemporary times.
- List the major causes and consequences of terrorism.
- How does the unit connect terrorism to ethics, and what alternative does Gandhi's philosophy offer?
- Terrorism = the systematic, unlawful use of violence/threat against people or property to achieve political or social objectives.
- Its history runs from the Zealots (ancient world) through the French Revolution (origin of the word) to 19th-century Anarchists and today's transnational, civilian-targeting, techno-savvy groups.
- Causes include unresolved disputes, absent redressal systems, misguidance of youth, media amplification, democratic openness, globalization, and psychological factors like loneliness.
- Consequences span environmental, political, and economic domains.
- Ethically, terrorism is judged always wrong because it violates the fundamental right to life; Gandhi's Ahimsa and Sarvodaya are held up as the constructive alternative.